--- title: "Is grend.club a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "grend.club" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is Grend a scam? grend.club trust score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/grend.club assessed: 2026-11-01 --- # Is Grend a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment of grend.club: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** grend.club shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-11-01 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 14 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 5 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | | Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the grend.club homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/grend.club/screenshots/first.png) _What grend.club served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-11-01. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. The domain grend.club is a recently registered website on the ".club" top-level domain. When it was visited, the front page returned an access-denied response from the protective edge layer, and the page that loaded was a browser interstitial titled as a suspected-phishing warning. Only a very short fragment of text was captured. The site's products, services, branding and stated purpose therefore could not be read from its own content, and its business model cannot be established from first-hand page evidence. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Confirmed contradictions are present, and this is the decisive element of the assessment. The domain is **blacklisted**. Multiple independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag it as malicious, including two tier-one security vendors, and a kill-switch condition was triggered by the volume of malicious detections. The page served to the analysis session was itself a suspected-phishing interstitial, which corroborates the external listings. The identity of the operator could not be independently connected to any real-world brand or person, so nothing on record offsets these findings. No conflicting legal entities were observed, and no specific brand impersonation was identified, because the page content was not retrievable. The risk therefore rests on the reputation and phishing-warning evidence rather than on analysed page claims. Behavioural testing showed heavy third-party traffic from the front page. Roughly nine in ten network interactions in the sandbox were external, with over a hundred background requests and several outbound submissions, all to recognised destinations. Dozens of console errors and a sharp page-structure change after interaction were also recorded. No wallet-connection prompts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms or credential posts to external hosts were detected. These behavioural findings are secondary and do not mitigate the blacklisting. Evidence: - Front page: the edge layer returned an access-denied response, and the captured page title was a suspected-phishing warning. - Threat-intelligence coverage: 14 malicious and 1 suspicious detections out of 92 engines, including two tier-one vendors, with a blacklist flag confirmed. - Domain registration: created 2026-06-16, about 0.38 years (~137 days) old, with expiry set to 2027-06-16. - Front-page sandbox behaviour: 102 external background requests, 9 external POST submissions, 34 console errors, and a page-structure change of 1,523 mutations after interaction, with no wallet, clipboard or hidden-form activity. ### Regulatory Verification Notes No legal, terms, privacy or about pages could be reached, because capture was blocked at the front page. The site's licensing status, corporate registration and operator disclosures therefore cannot be assessed, and no third-party broker or regulator record matched the domain. The absence of a regulatory footprint does not by itself indicate fraud, but the site has no independently verifiable identity to set against the reputation findings above. The domain was registered through a commercial registrar, and the registrant details are shielded by privacy redaction. This is an administrative feature of the record, not a contradiction. The transport-layer posture is sound but does not indicate legitimacy. A valid, domain-validated certificate is in place, which proves only that someone controls the domain. Evidence: - Registration: registered through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com, with registrant details redacted for privacy. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2027-01-11. - Broker databases: no matching broker or regulator entry. ### What to Verify Next Verification here concerns whether the listings are current and whether any legitimate operator exists, not whether to proceed. Anyone with a business reason to interact should first re-check the domain's current status with the relevant threat-intelligence providers, since a listing can reflect either an operator-run abuse campaign or a compromise that has since been cleaned. Any claim to represent a company should be tested through a contact route obtained independently of this site, such as an official registry entry or a known corporate channel. The official support and contact channels should likewise be confirmed offline. The page title and block response should be reproduced from a different network and device profile, to establish whether the phishing interstitial is shown consistently. Evidence: - Front page: the same block response and warning interstitial were returned on all three behavioural runs, so the behaviour appears consistent. - Reputation: the malicious detections are current at the time of analysis and span more than one source. - Identity: no operator, company name or registration number could be associated with the domain. ### Summary Verdict The site sits in the lowest trust tier, with a clearly cautionary posture. Confirmed external blacklisting and a phishing warning at the site's entry point outweigh every neutral or technical positive signal. The operator's real-world identity remains unestablished. Interaction involving credentials, logins or financial activity is classed as unsafe, and only passive, read-only exposure is considered acceptable. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all six observed addresses are edge servers. Their ownership is split between Cloudflare and a second large cloud provider. The origin server was not observable, which prevents independent verification of the true hosting and can mask rapid content swaps behind a stable front. Cloudflare's bot protection is active and the certificate is valid. These are mitigating factors only. They reflect shared infrastructure that many sites, legitimate or not, can use, and they cannot offset the reputation findings. ### Closing Assessment Credentials, payment details and personal data should not be entered on this site, and no files should be downloaded from it. Any contact initiated from it should be treated as unsolicited until proven otherwise. If it has already been visited and anything was submitted, the affected passwords should be changed and the relevant accounts monitored. Organisations should consider blocking the domain at the network or email-filtering layer while the listings remain active. _Written analysis generated 2026-11-01 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered between three and six months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_YOUNG_6M`) ### 04 Registration and ownership - The registration record withholds contact details for the operator. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN`) - Registration details are held behind a privacy service, so no operator is named publicly. This is common and legal, and it also means there is nobody to check. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_PRIVATE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 15% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of grend.club. - The request stayed on grend.club. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-06-16. (Noted) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3030::6815:fb9 | | Name servers | tosana.ns.cloudflare.com, teagan.ns.cloudflare.com | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 6 | | Edge IP addresses | 6 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-01-11 | | Domain age | 0.38 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-06-16 | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 14 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about grend.club at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [solcards.club](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solcards.club), another .club site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [ethzm.club](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ethzm.club), another .club site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 1/100) - [coinfast.club](https://trustsniffer.com/report/coinfast.club), another .club site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [bncb.club](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bncb.club), another .club site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 4/100) - [apyx.club](https://trustsniffer.com/report/apyx.club), another .club site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [makemewin.club](https://trustsniffer.com/report/makemewin.club), another .club site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 10/100) - [neje.club](https://trustsniffer.com/report/neje.club), another .club site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [web3-quantumledger.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/web3-quantumledger.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 24/100) - [dreambot.cc](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dreambot.cc), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [xsjiamei.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xsjiamei.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/grend.club) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/grend.club · assessed 2026-11-01.*