---
title: "Is hash.horse a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "hash.horse"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is hash.horse a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/hash.horse
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is hash.horse a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** hash.horse shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 9 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 3 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2021 (39 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the hash.horse homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/hash.horse/screenshots/first.png)

_What hash.horse served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2021.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website sits on a ".horse" domain, an uncommon top-level domain. When visited, it showed only a security interstitial from its edge provider titled "Suspected Phishing" (HTTP 403), with no recognisable brand, product or service content. Its commercial purpose and business model therefore cannot be established from what it shows a visitor, and the only thing the visitor sees is a warning page.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they are decisive. The domain is **blacklisted**. Several independent reputation engines classify it as malicious or suspicious, including two tier-one security vendors. The edge provider's own interstitial separately labels it as suspected phishing. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal-entity names were identified, but that reflects how little the site presents, not reassurance. The current domain registration is only a few months old, yet the archive shows the domain online for years earlier. That pattern is consistent with a lapsed and re-registered domain. It is context rather than proof, but it carries weight alongside the threat listings. The sandbox saw no wallet-connect prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, credential posts to external hosts or fingerprinting. It did record heavy third-party request traffic, with a high share of requests leaving the domain, and many console errors. The third-party destinations were recognised ones. Even so, the page was gated behind a challenge, so this behavioural check covers a narrow surface and does not offset the reputation findings. Evidence:

- Homepage: the visit returned an edge-provider challenge page titled "Suspected Phishing" instead of site content.
- Reputation: 9 engines rated the domain malicious and 2 suspicious, including two tier-one vendors, and the domain is on an external blacklist.
- Provenance: WHOIS creation date 2026-07-29 (~0.24 years under the current registration).
- Archive: 39 snapshots spanning 2021–2026 (6 years tracked), with no content drift detected.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The visible page presents no company name, licence, registration number or legal documentation. No regulated status could be tied to the domain, and no third-party broker reputation record exists for it. The WHOIS record lists a registrant organisation, "Pav LLC", with the individual owner redacted. Nothing the site shows corroborates that name, so it cannot be treated as the verified operator. The certificate is domain-validated only. It confirms control of the domain, not the identity or legitimacy of the operator. The absence of licensing information is a verification gap rather than proof of wrongdoing, but here it sits alongside confirmed threat detections. Evidence:

- Homepage: no operator name, licence or registration disclosure is presented to the visitor.
- Registration: registrar NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED, with the owner redacted and "Pav LLC" listed as organisation.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-25.

### What to Verify Next

Anyone who reached this domain through a link, message or advertisement should trace the source of that referral through an independent, trusted channel. Reaching the site directly from an unsolicited link should be treated as suspect. Any claim of affiliation with a known brand or service should be checked on that organisation's officially published domain, not through this one. If the operator later presents financial or investment services, licensing should be confirmed with the relevant national registry. Official contact channels should be confirmed by an offline route. Before any interaction, the status of the edge provider's phishing designation and of the security-vendor detections should be rechecked, because these listings can be cleared or reinstated. Evidence:

- Homepage: the edge-provider phishing interstitial is the only content observed.
- Reputation: detections from multiple engines and an external blacklist are active.
- Registration: the current registration is recent relative to the archived history.

### Summary Verdict

The assessment is critical and clearly cautionary. Convergent external threat detections and a phishing designation outweigh every technical hygiene indicator present. The site presents nothing that independently establishes its identity or legitimate purpose, and no mitigating evidence offsets the reputation risk.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN/WAF with bot protection. All observed addresses are edge servers, and the origin host is not observable. The sandbox found no cloaking, which is a modest mitigating factor. Edge-only visibility prevents independent verification of the true hosting and can mask rapid content swaps. This protective infrastructure is not evidence of legitimacy and cannot offset the reputation risk.


### Closing Assessment

At most, the domain should be treated as read-only. No logins, credentials, wallet connections or payments should be attempted on it. Anyone who has already entered credentials or financial details should change them immediately and monitor the affected accounts.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The registration record withholds contact details for the operator. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN`)
- Registration details are held behind a privacy service, so no operator is named publicly. This is common and legal, and it also means there is nobody to check. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_PRIVATE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 15% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of hash.horse.

- The request stayed on hash.horse. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-07-29. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2021-04-10. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3033::ac43:8837 |
| Name servers | lisa.ns.cloudflare.com, harlan.ns.cloudflare.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-25 |
| Domain age | 0.24 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-07-29 |
| Archive first seen | 2021-04-10 |
| Archive snapshots | 39 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 9 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about hash.horse at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [sol212.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sol212.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [terminasol.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/terminasol.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [jobyweeks.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/jobyweeks.info), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [xrphai.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xrphai.info), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [testnet-dop.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/testnet-dop.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 16/100)
- [claim-fortraders.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-fortraders.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [drop-flap.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/drop-flap.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [claim-peipeicoin.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-peipeicoin.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [amlripple.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/amlripple.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 2/100)
- [flaregovernance-instant.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flaregovernance-instant.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hash.horse) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/hash.horse · assessed 2026-10-27.*
