--- title: "Is igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 15" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev a Scam?" trust_score: 15 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-26 --- # igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev: TrustSniffer assessment: 15/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 15/100.** igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | | Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview The website is a single-page promotional site titled "The Black Bull | $ANSEM", which appears to be built around a crypto-style token theme. It is served from a randomly generated subdomain on a shared free-hosting platform, not from a branded domain of its own. The homepage carries a substantial amount of text content and appears intended to promote a token or community project. The evidence does not establish who operates it or what, if anything, it sells. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This site shows confirmed contradictory signals and is assessed as **high risk**. Multiple independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag it: two engines classify it as malicious and one as suspicious. The site is therefore **blacklisted** by third-party reputation sources. This decisive signal outweighs the valid transport encryption and the mainstream hosting. Behavioural testing of the homepage adds to the concern. During three successful sandbox runs the page generated heavy outbound traffic to third-party destinations, and several of those destinations are not recognised as standard, benign services. Some of that traffic was outbound POST submissions. This pattern is consistent with data being sent off-site, though the testing did not show what was transmitted. The page also produced a high number of script errors, which suggests a poorly built or hastily assembled page. The domain structure compounds the risk: a throwaway-looking subdomain on a shared hosting platform is the kind of address often used for short-lived token promotions and lure pages. No wallet-connection prompts, wallet-draining routines, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or content cloaking were observed. The risk is therefore driven by the reputation listings and the outbound data flows, not by a demonstrated drainer. No conflicting legal identities were found, because the site presents no legal identity at all. Evidence: - Homepage (title "The Black Bull | $ANSEM"): the page is reached through a random-string subdomain on a shared hosting platform, not a branded domain. - Homepage behaviour: 11 external background requests, of which 4 went to non-whitelisted destinations. 6 external POST requests were made, 4 of them to non-whitelisted destinations. External activity reached up to 71.4% on the page, and 10 console errors were logged. - Reputation checks: 2 malicious and 1 suspicious detections, and 58 harmless verdicts. An external blacklist flag was also raised for the domain. - Homepage behaviour: no wallet-connect, wallet-drainer, clipboard-write, hidden-form, or cloaking activity was recorded across 3 runs. ### Regulatory Verification Notes No licensing, registration, or regulated-entity status could be linked to this site. No corporate name, jurisdiction, or accountable operator was established. This leaves the real-world identity behind the "Black Bull" and "$ANSEM" branding unconfirmed. For a site with token-style branding, the absence of any identifiable operator, terms, or legal pages in the captured evidence means there is no accountable party to hold responsible for any financial interaction. This is a verification gap in its own right. It is distinct from the reputation-based contradictions above, and it strengthens the cautionary posture. No third-party broker or regulator listing matched the site. A missing regulatory match is not evidence of wrongdoing on its own. Evidence: - Homepage: no operator, legal entity, licence, or registration number was identified in the captured content, and the site's identity could not be independently verified. - Domain: the address is a platform-assigned subdomain, so it does not point to a distinct registrant. - Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is a domain-validated one issued by WE1, valid to 2027-01-01. Domain-validated certificates confirm control of the domain, not the identity of the operator. - Hosting: the site is served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). ### What to Verify Next Before any interaction, the project's claimed identity should be checked through channels independent of this site. This means looking for an official project announcement on a separately established website or social profile that links back to this exact address. A token or project name seen here should be checked against independent sources before any funds or credentials are involved. Any contract address, wallet address, or download link should be compared with a source that does not depend on this page. The official support or contact channels should be confirmed independently. If the page is encountered through a message, advertisement, or social post, the originating account and its history should be assessed. Evidence: - Homepage: the title and branding are the only identifying content, so they must be matched against external sources. - Reputation checks: the current flags should be re-checked before any decision, since listings can change if the site is cleaned up or taken down. - Behavioural testing: outbound POST traffic to non-whitelisted destinations was observed, so no personal or payment data should be entered. ### Summary Verdict The available evidence supports a **high-risk, clearly cautionary posture**. Confirmed third-party reputation listings and unexplained outbound data flows dominate, and nothing in the identity or provenance evidence offsets them. Valid transport encryption and an established hosting provider are routine and do not indicate legitimacy. Apparent legitimacy cannot be established. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and web application firewall, and all observed addresses are CDN edge servers. The true origin server was not observable, so the real hosting location cannot be independently verified. This protective layer is a mitigating factor only. It improves availability and resilience, but it also makes content swaps harder to detect, and it does not offset the reputation findings. The certificate is valid, with a long remaining validity period. ### Closing Assessment The site should be treated as unsafe for any sensitive action. No logins, credentials, personal data, payments, or wallet connections should be entered or approved on it, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Viewing the page without interacting is the most that is advisable, ideally from an isolated environment. If the link arrived unsolicited, it should be reported and not followed further. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`) - The page exchanged network traffic with destinations TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_TRAFFIC`) - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`) ### 03 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev. - The request stayed on igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2cd6 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-01-01 | | Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [bitcoininu.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bitcoininu.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 23/100) - [rewards-kucoin.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rewards-kucoin.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [migration-playzap-en.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/migration-playzap-en.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [migrate-mypaal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/migrate-mypaal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [site-7880365033-coinvaultsupport-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/site-7880365033-coinvaultsupport-com.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [uniswap-views.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/uniswap-views.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [ledgerportal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ledgerportal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [oortech.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/oortech.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [salyers-law.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/salyers-law.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [polybutyleneflorida.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/polybutyleneflorida.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-26.*