---
title: "Is innovateprotoclls.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "innovateprotoclls.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is innovateprotoclls.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Review, 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 70
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/innovateprotoclls.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is innovateprotoclls.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** innovateprotoclls.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 70%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 9 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2.1 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (4 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the innovateprotoclls.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/innovateprotoclls.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What innovateprotoclls.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a project hosted on a free subdomain of a developer web-hosting platform, with no custom domain of its own. When it was assessed, it presented a security interstitial headed "Suspected Phishing" instead of any business content, product pages, or branding. No product, service, or business model could be established from the site itself. Its apparent function is that of an unbranded, disposable web property of unknown purpose.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and weigh decisively against the site. Multiple independent security engines, including two tier-one vendors, currently flag the domain as malicious, and it is **blacklisted** in external reputation sources. The hosting platform's own interstitial describes the site as suspected phishing, and historical records also associate the domain with phishing. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were established, because no identity content could be observed. The block is nonetheless the principal risk indicator, and it coincides with a very young, free-subdomain footprint, a pattern common to throwaway phishing and malware infrastructure. The behavioural sandbox found no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or credential posts to external destinations. This does not offset the reputation findings, because the page content was gated and little was exposed to inspect. Evidence:

- Homepage: the page served an interstitial titled "Suspected Phishing" instead of site content.
- External reputation: nine engines rate the domain malicious and one suspicious, including two tier-one vendors, and a blacklist hit is confirmed.
- Homepage behaviour: 15 cross-origin XHR calls and 5 cross-origin POSTs, with external traffic peaking at about 93.5% of requests, all to allow-listed destinations. 14 console errors were logged and no wallet, clipboard, or hidden-form abuse was observed.
- Domain provenance: registered about 2.1 years ago, with 4 archive snapshots spanning 2024–2025 (2 years tracked).

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No legal, terms, privacy, or about pages could be assessed, because the only content captured was the interstitial. The site therefore makes no licensing, registration, or company-identity claims to evaluate. Operator ownership and governance remain opaque, and the real-world identity behind the domain is unverified. Third-party broker databases hold no record matching this site, so there is no reputational context from that source. The reputation findings above, not any regulatory gap, drive the risk assessment. Evidence:

- Homepage: no company name, licence, or registration disclosure was observable on the captured page.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate was issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2027-01-08. A certificate of this type proves only domain control and says nothing about operator identity.
- Broker databases: no match was found.

### What to Verify Next

Anyone who received a link to this domain should establish through an independent route who sent it and why. If the link was presented as coming from a known company, project, or service, confirm with that organisation using contact details obtained independently of the message. Do not rely on contact details inside the message. If the sender claims a regulated financial or investment activity, check the claimed licence in the relevant regulator's public registry. Security teams should block or monitor the domain and re-evaluate it only if the threat-intelligence listings are formally cleared. Confirm any official support or contact channel offline before relying on it. Evidence:

- Homepage: the platform interstitial gave no operator or contact information for follow-up.
- External reputation: the active malicious listings remain unresolved.
- Domain provenance: the free-subdomain form means the domain itself carries no brand or organisational context.

### Summary Verdict

The assessment is a high-risk, clearly cautionary posture. Active threat-intelligence detections and a confirmed blacklist hit outweigh the technically sound transport security and the absence of overtly abusive runtime behaviour. The operator's identity is unestablished, and the available evidence gives no basis for treating the site as legitimate.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind a mainstream CDN and WAF, with bot-challenge protection active. All four observed addresses are CDN edge servers, and the origin host could not be observed. This is a mitigating factor only. It shows ordinary, reputable hosting hygiene, but it prevents independent verification of the true host and does not counter the active external threat detections.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as unsafe for any sensitive interaction. Accounts, credentials, payment details, wallet connections, and file downloads should not be entrusted to it. Any link to it received by message or email should not be followed further and should be reported to the platform and internal security channels.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)
- The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of innovateprotoclls.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on innovateprotoclls.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-09-01. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2fb4 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-08 |
| Domain age | 2.15 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-09-01 |
| Archive snapshots | 4 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 9 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about innovateprotoclls.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [solciety-io.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solciety-io.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 25/100)
- [naruflix.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/naruflix.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [apeterminal-reg-web3.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/apeterminal-reg-web3.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [claim-stargrace.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-stargrace.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [eryerh54hthtrhrh.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/eryerh54hthtrhrh.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [list-votesokx.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/list-votesokx.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 20/100)
- [binanceairdrop-99l.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/binanceairdrop-99l.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [smartapp-verify.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/smartapp-verify.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [pub-8d59738861b849e5a38b795cc17b1019.r2.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pub-8d59738861b849e5a38b795cc17b1019.r2.dev), another .dev site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [pub-72295f71e45d431995028c79cf261dae.r2.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pub-72295f71e45d431995028c79cf261dae.r2.dev), another .dev site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/innovateprotoclls.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/innovateprotoclls.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*