---
title: "Is ipump.fan a Scam? Trust Score 1/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "ipump.fan"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is ipump.fan a Scam? Risk Report, Score 1/100"
trust_score: 1
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/ipump.fan
assessed: 2026-10-25
---

# Is ipump.fan a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 1/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 1/100.** ipump.fan shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 12 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (3 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YR1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the ipump.fan homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/ipump.fan/screenshots/first.png)

_What ipump.fan served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

The website at ipump.fan is a single-page front end whose browser title reads "pump.fun", a name that differs from the domain it is served from. It presents a short homepage and no other substantive pages were captured. Its apparent purpose is to pass as, or ride on, a well-known crypto token-launch brand. The page text and operator identity could not be independently tied to any real-world entity.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and material. Multiple independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag the domain as malicious, and the combined detections are strong enough to count as a confirmed **blacklisting**. Reputation records also carry a phishing association for the domain. The homepage title adopts the name of an established crypto platform while the domain is a different, lookalike string. This is the classic pattern of brand-adjacent lure sites that draw users into wallet or credential interactions. No separate conflicting legal entities were observed, and the sandbox saw no wallet-connect prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms or third-party data posts in the sessions run. That reduces the evidence of active drainer behaviour but does not offset the reputational findings. The domain's extreme newness and thin history point the same way, as do the repeated front-end errors during interaction. A lure site that stays quiet until a user engages is a realistic scenario here. Evidence:

- Homepage: the page title reads "pump.fun" while the serving domain is ipump.fan, a name mismatch consistent with lookalike behaviour.
- Domain registered 2026-09-03 (~0.14 years, about 52 days old) via NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED.
- Web archive holds only 3 snapshots, from 2026-09-03 to 2026-09-22 (1 year tracked), so there is no established history.
- Behavioural sandbox, 3 of 3 runs completed: 0 external requests, no wallet-connect activity, 9 console errors, and a bot-protection challenge in front of the page.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No licensing, registration or legal-entity information is disclosed on the captured page. Real-world operator identity is not independently verified, and registration records show incomplete ownership details, which amounts to ownership opacity. A missing licence does not on its own indicate fraud. Here it adds to a profile that already carries confirmed adverse reputation signals. No third-party broker or regulatory-database entry matches the site, so there is no external attestation of legitimacy. The valid but low-assurance transport certificate confirms only an encrypted connection, not the identity of the operator. Evidence:

- Homepage: no company name, licence number, jurisdiction or legal pages were identified.
- Hosting: AS214036 (Ultahost, Inc.), registry AFRINIC, country ZA.
- TLS certificate issued by YR1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-06 with about 42 days remaining.
- No broker or regulatory-database match was found for the site or brand.

### What to Verify Next

Any contact with the genuine platform should start from an official address obtained independently, such as a bookmark, an official social account verified through the platform's own channels, or a trusted directory. Do not follow links from this domain. Anyone who has already interacted with the site should review wallet approvals and revoke any unfamiliar permissions. They should also change reused passwords and report the domain to the impersonated brand's security channel. Official support channels should be confirmed offline before any further engagement. Evidence:

- Homepage: the title claims a brand identity that the domain does not independently support.
- The domain was registered about seven weeks before this assessment, so no long record exists to vouch for it.
- Reputation findings are current, so any earlier interaction should be treated as potentially exposed.

### Summary Verdict

The evidence converges on a high-risk posture. Confirmed adverse reputation findings, a lookalike brand presentation and a newly created domain with no track record outweigh the few neutral technical signals, such as a valid certificate and quiet sandbox behaviour. Legitimacy is not supported, and the operator's identity is unverified.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served from a single IP address on a commodity data-center hosting network operated by Ultahost, registered in Africa with the server located in South Africa. No CDN or WAF was identified in the infrastructure data, although a bot-protection challenge was observed during browsing. No protective layer is evident that would offset the reputation findings. The hosting is generic, low-barrier, and shared with unrelated customers, so it neither supports nor confirms the operator's legitimacy.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most, and preferably not visited at all. Do not enter credentials, connect a wallet, sign transactions or send funds. Reach the genuine platform only through independently confirmed official channels.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, registration and ownership, behaviour in a sandbox.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### 05 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of ipump.fan.

- The request stayed on ipump.fan. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by ultahost.com, across 4 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-03. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-03. (Clear)
- It is hosted on ULTAHOST-AS, from a server in ZA. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED |
| Hosting | ULTAHOST-AS - Ultahost, Inc., US |
| Country | ZA |
| Server IP | 192.142.53.246 |
| Name servers | ns1.ultahost.com, ns2.ultahost.com, ns3.ultahost.com, ns4.ultahost.com |
| CDN / edge network | Not detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 1 |
| Edge IP addresses | 0 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 1 |
| SSL issuer | YR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-06 |
| Domain age | 0.14 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-03 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-03 |
| Archive snapshots | 3 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 12 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about ipump.fan at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [webciphervault.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/webciphervault.com), also hosted by ULTAHOST-AS (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [baseweb3wallets.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/baseweb3wallets.com), also hosted by ULTAHOST-AS (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [bitstampfx.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bitstampfx.com), also hosted by ULTAHOST-AS (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [actlocal.network](https://trustsniffer.com/report/actlocal.network), also hosted by ULTAHOST-AS (Low Trust, 33/100)
- [ai-gradient.network](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ai-gradient.network), also hosted by ULTAHOST-AS (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [memes-airdrop.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/memes-airdrop.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [hyperliquidexclusivenft.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hyperliquidexclusivenft.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [deltaliquidlitys.cfd](https://trustsniffer.com/report/deltaliquidlitys.cfd), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [quicktent.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/quicktent.org), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100)
- [ghost-holding.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ghost-holding.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ipump.fan) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/ipump.fan · assessed 2026-10-25.*