---
title: "Is isync.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "isync.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is isync.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/isync.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is isync.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** isync.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 4 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2.1 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (12 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the isync.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/isync.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What isync.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a subdomain on a free, shared web-hosting platform, so it has no standalone branded domain. When analysed, its entry page returned a short security interstitial instead of site content. That interstitial was a hosting-platform challenge page titled as a suspected-phishing warning. Its apparent purpose and business model therefore cannot be determined from the content a visitor is shown, and nothing on it identifies a product, brand or operator.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The evidence shows **confirmed adverse external reputation**. Several independent threat-intelligence engines currently flag the domain as malicious, with one more rating it suspicious, and at least one top-tier security vendor is among them. The site is therefore treated as formally blacklisted, and this is the decisive factor in the assessment. The captured entry page is itself a hosting-platform warning labelled as suspected phishing, which corroborates the external detections. Archive history also carries a known-phishing association. No brand impersonation and no conflicting legal identities were observed, but only because no on-site content could be inspected. Browser-behaviour testing found no wallet-connection prompts, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden forms, and no credential forms posting to external hosts. This is not exculpatory, because the interactive content sits behind a bot-challenge gate. The testing did record heavy third-party traffic (a very high share of requests going to external hosts, including several external POST submissions) and a high volume of script errors during page load. The domain also closely resembles the generic name of its hosting platform, a pattern consistent with a disposable or lookalike deployment. No suspicious contact address was identified. Evidence:

- Entry page: the captured response was a blocked, bot-challenge interstitial titled as a suspected-phishing notice, and no site content was retrievable.
- External reputation: 4 engines rated the domain malicious and 1 suspicious, with a top-tier vendor among them.
- Browser behaviour: 22 external fetch/XHR calls and 4 external POSTs, 19 console errors, and no wallet, clipboard or hidden-form activity.
- Provenance: the domain is ~2.1 years old, with 12 archive snapshots spanning 2024–2026 (3 years tracked).

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No legal, terms, privacy or about pages could be assessed, so no licensing status, corporate registration or named operator can be linked to the site. The site cannot be tied to any real-world brand or person, and operator accountability is unestablished. Hosting on a shared subdomain means the domain itself carries no organisational identity. No third-party broker or regulatory-registry record matched the site, so no reputational signal from that quarter applies. The conclusion rests on the confirmed external threat detections, not on the absence of licensing. Evidence:

- Entry page: no company name, licence or registration reference was visible in the retrieved content.
- Domain structure: the site is a subdomain of a free hosting platform, not an independently registered brand domain.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2027-01-18. This confirms encryption only and says nothing about operator legitimacy.

### What to Verify Next

Until the external detections are cleared, interaction should be limited to passive observation, avoiding any login, credential entry, wallet connection or payment. If the site was reached through a message, advertisement or referral, its origin should be confirmed with the sender through an independent channel. A named operator should then be identified through an authoritative source. If the site belongs to a known organisation, that organisation's official channels should confirm whether this deployment is theirs. If it is theirs, it may have been compromised or misused and should be reported for clean-up. The hosting platform's abuse process and the flagging engines' own re-evaluation status should be checked for any change before reconsidering the site. Evidence:

- Current state: the site is flagged by multiple threat-intelligence sources and challenged by its own hosting platform.
- Identity: the entry page offers no verifiable operator identity or official contact route.
- Access gating: a bot challenge blocked normal retrieval of the entry page, so interactive functions remain unexamined.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is **high risk**. Confirmed adverse threat-intelligence detections, a hosting-platform phishing warning, and an unverifiable operator identity converge on a clearly cautionary conclusion. Technical hygiene such as valid encryption does not offset this. The site is unsuitable for any sensitive interaction.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare CDN/WAF, and every observed address is a Cloudflare edge address on AS13335 (US, ARIN-registered). No origin server was exposed. The CDN and its bot-protection layer are mitigating factors only. They show standard, reputable delivery infrastructure, but they also prevent independent verification of the true hosting origin and cannot offset the confirmed reputation findings. A valid, long-dated certificate from a recognised issuer is likewise a baseline hygiene signal and not evidence of legitimacy.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection or any financial transaction. Any account details or funds already submitted to it should be treated as at risk and changed or reported promptly. Further engagement should wait until the external detections are formally cleared and an accountable operator is independently confirmed.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of isync.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on isync.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-09-12. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f62 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 8 |
| Edge IP addresses | 8 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-18 |
| Domain age | 2.12 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-09-12 |
| Archive snapshots | 12 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 4 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about isync.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [vote-tokensworks-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-tokensworks-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 2/100)
- [vote-mefai.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-mefai.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 23/100)
- [virtuals-votings.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/virtuals-votings.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [cryptifyaiconfig.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cryptifyaiconfig.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [claim-bitcoin-hyper.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-bitcoin-hyper.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [blockdagtoken.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockdagtoken.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [telcoins-bank-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/telcoins-bank-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [yeifi-votings.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/yeifi-votings.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 20/100)
- [pumpfunlivestream.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pumpfunlivestream.live), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [aerocdrome.finance](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aerocdrome.finance), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/isync.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/isync.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*