---
title: "Is kokomoji.web.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "kokomoji.web.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is kokomoji.web.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/kokomoji.web.app
assessed: 2026-10-25
---

# Is kokomoji.web.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** kokomoji.web.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 4 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 3% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Web archive | Never archived (No public history of this site) | Watch |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR4) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the kokomoji.web.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/kokomoji.web.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What kokomoji.web.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

Kokomoji is a small web application presented under a shared web-app hosting namespace. Its homepage is titled as a collection of 3,333 faces "assembled on-chain", which points to a blockchain-based digital collectible or NFT-style project aimed at visitors interested in on-chain generative artwork. The captured page offered no further business detail, so the commercial model behind the collection is not established.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and decisive. The domain is carried on **confirmed blacklist** listings from third-party threat-intelligence sources. Several independent security engines classify it as malicious, and a further engine rates it suspicious. This is the evidence behind the cautionary posture and is not offset by any positive signal on the site. Separately, four abuse reports exist against a delivery-network address the site resolves to. They attach to a shared provider address rather than to the site specifically, so they are corroborating background and not independent proof of wrongdoing. No brand impersonation and no conflicting legal identities were observed. The risk therefore rests entirely on the blacklist and reputation evidence. Sandbox testing of the homepage found no wallet-connection prompts, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden or externally posting credential forms, and no cloaking. This lowers the likelihood of an active drainer on the page as captured, but does not neutralise the external listings. The page can change after capture, and the listings indicate that at least some detection sources have seen hostile behaviour. Evidence:

- Homepage: multi-engine reputation check recorded 4 malicious and 1 suspicious verdicts against 57 harmless and 31 undetected, which triggered the blacklist classification.
- Homepage behaviour: 3 of 3 sandbox runs completed, with 9 external XHR/POST requests, none to non-whitelisted destinations, and 0 wallet-connect, clipboard-write, hidden-form or cloaking events.
- Hosting address: 4 abuse reports with a low confidence score, categorised as shared-infrastructure reports rather than site-specific ones.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site's real-world operator has not been independently connected to a named person or company, and the evidence supplies no licence, registration or regulated-entity status. An on-chain collectible project does not by itself imply a regulated activity. Nothing here supports treating the site as supervised, and any financial promises it makes would carry no regulatory protection. Third-party broker-reputation datasets hold no entry for the site. This is neutral and is not an endorsement. The transport layer is technically sound but carries no identity assurance. A domain-validated certificate only proves control of the hostname. It does not prove who operates the site. Evidence:

- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS54113 (Fastly, Inc., US), registered with ARIN.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR4 (DV), valid to 2026-12-22.
- Identity assessment: operator identity remains unverified, and no licensing or entity disclosure was found on the captured homepage.

### What to Verify Next

Before any interaction beyond viewing, the collection's claimed provenance should be tested independently. The 3,333-item on-chain claim can be checked against the contract address on a public block explorer, looking at deployer history and verified source code. Any social or marketplace accounts linked from the site should be checked from the platforms' own official listings rather than from links on the page. Official support and contact channels should also be confirmed through an independent route. If the reputation listings clear, a fresh scan is the way to confirm it. The listings are the controlling issue, so they should be re-checked directly with the reporting sources before any decision to engage. Evidence:

- Homepage title: claims 3,333 faces assembled on-chain, which is verifiable against a public ledger.
- Reputation listings: current blacklist status is the controlling variable and should be re-checked at source.
- Operator identity: no named operator is available to check against any registry.

### Summary Verdict

The site's posture is elevated risk, driven by confirmed threat-intelligence listings and not by any observed impersonation or identity conflict. Technical hygiene is adequate but cannot offset the reputational evidence. Legitimacy cannot be inferred from the evidence available, and the operator's identity remains unestablished.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Fastly, a mainstream content delivery network. Every observed address is a delivery-edge address, so the origin server is not observable and hosting cannot be independently verified. Edge delivery of this kind can also mask rapid content changes. This is a mitigating factor for availability and baseline hygiene only. It does not offset the external threat detections and is not evidence of legitimacy.


### Closing Assessment

Treat the site as read-only. Do not log in, connect a wallet, sign transactions, enter credentials, or make any payment or financial commitment through it. Nothing should be downloaded from it until the blacklist listings are independently cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE`)
- The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2620:0:890::100 (Google LLC, Content Delivery Network), 3% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of kokomoji.web.app.

- The request stayed on kokomoji.web.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on FASTLY, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | FASTLY - Fastly, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2620:0:890::100 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (fastly) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 2 |
| Edge IP addresses | 2 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR4 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-22 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | 0 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 4 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 3% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about kokomoji.web.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [xpmarkets.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xpmarkets.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [quest-base.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/quest-base.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 23/100)
- [xmn-xaman.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xmn-xaman.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 17/100)
- [degenpad.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/degenpad.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [trustwallet-begonia-038e52.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trustwallet-begonia-038e52.netlify.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [claim-solrewards.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-solrewards.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [realopenseaio.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/realopenseaio.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [listup.blog](https://trustsniffer.com/report/listup.blog), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [allocations-netnet.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/allocations-netnet.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/kokomoji.web.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/kokomoji.web.app · assessed 2026-10-25.*