---
title: "Is ledgerportal.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "ledgerportal.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is ledgerportal.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 70
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/ledgerportal.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-25
---

# Is ledgerportal.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** ledgerportal.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 70%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 14 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 1.7 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2025 (4 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the ledgerportal.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/ledgerportal.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What ledgerportal.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2025.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website presents itself as a "Ledger Developer Portal", a single-page developer-facing landing site published on a free, shared Cloudflare Pages subdomain rather than on a dedicated branded domain. The homepage carries roughly seven thousand characters of text and loads without error. The name and framing invite association with the Ledger crypto-wallet brand, which suggests the site is meant to look like a developer or onboarding gateway for a digital-asset product.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Confirmed adverse contradictions exist, and the site is **blacklisted** by multiple independent reputation sources. A large cluster of security engines classifies the domain as malicious, and several major, tier-one security vendors are among them. Prior phishing association is also on record for this hostname. These are confirmed threat detections against the site itself, not a compromised third-party file or a soft broker warning, and they decisively outweigh every neutral or favourable technical attribute. The "developer portal" title borrows the naming of a well-known wallet brand, but nothing independently connects the site to that brand or to any identifiable operator. A shared free-hosting subdomain carrying a brand-style name is a recognised pattern for credential and seed-phrase harvesting. The sandbox saw no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, external credential posts or cloaking. This is not reassurance. The harmful behaviour may be gated behind a later interaction, or the detections may reflect content or campaigns that have since rotated. Page structure changed sharply after interaction, with more than two thousand DOM mutations, which is consistent with a heavily script-driven interface. No conflicting legal entities were found, because the site discloses no legal identity at all. Evidence:

- Homepage and hostname: the domain is currently flagged malicious by 14 security engines, with a further engine marking it suspicious. Three tier-one vendors are among the detections, and an external blacklist entry is active.
- The domain has a prior phishing association, and its name is highly similar to the shared platform domain it sits under.
- Domain registered about 1.7 years ago (~611 days). The web archive holds 4 snapshots spanning February–April 2025 (1 year tracked), too thin a record to establish a legitimate history.
- Behavioural sandbox, 3 of 3 runs successful: 0 external requests, 0 wallet-connect events, 3 console errors, and 2,248 DOM mutations after interaction.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The homepage discloses no operating company, licence, registration number, terms of service or privacy policy that could be tied to a legal entity. Nor does the site connect itself to the brand its title evokes. On-page disclosure is therefore unclear, and no regulator or licensing registry vouches for the operator. No third-party broker or regulatory reputation entry matches the site. The absence of a licence is a verification gap, not proof of wrongdoing on its own. Here it compounds the confirmed threat detections rather than standing alone. A valid but domain-validated certificate establishes only that the connection is encrypted and that the certificate holder controls the hostname. It says nothing about who runs the site. Evidence:

- Homepage: no legal entity name, licence number, registry reference, or policy pages are presented.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-19, with 54 days remaining.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- No matching third-party broker reputation record was found. The DeFi-protocol directory returned no listing for this domain.

### What to Verify Next

Any claimed link to the Ledger brand should be tested through the official brand website, reached by typing the address directly or via a bookmark saved earlier, not through this site or any link pointing to it. Official developer documentation, support channels and download locations should be confirmed independently, and their addresses compared character by character with this hostname. If the portal was reached through a message, advertisement, search result or social post, that source should be treated as suspect and reported. Any prompt on the site to enter a recovery phrase, connect a wallet, sign a transaction or install software should be treated as hostile. Organisations should also check whether any user has already interacted with the site, and block the hostname at the network and email gateway layers. Evidence:

- Homepage: the developer-portal framing offers no verifiable owner, so provenance must be established outside the site.
- The malicious-detection record is current, so any past interaction should be reviewed for exposure.
- Contact and support channels should be confirmed through the official brand's own published routes, not those on this site.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is one of **elevated, decisive risk**. Confirmed multi-source threat detections and a prior phishing association define the assessment, and the sandbox's quiet behaviour and the valid encryption do not offset them. The site's real-world operator remains unconnected to any verifiable identity or brand, so there is no basis for treating it as legitimate.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site runs behind a mainstream CDN and web application firewall, with only edge addresses visible and the origin server not observable. That is typical of protected hosting, and it is a modest mitigating factor only. It does not establish legitimacy, and it prevents independent verification of the true host. Because the content sits behind this edge layer, it can also be swapped quickly without any change to the visible hosting footprint.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as unsafe for any login, credential entry, wallet connection, or financial interaction, and at most viewed passively from an isolated environment. Anyone who has already entered credentials or a recovery phrase should treat those secrets as compromised and rotate them or move assets immediately. The site should also be reported to the impersonated brand's security team and to the hosting platform's abuse channel.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of ledgerportal.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on ledgerportal.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2025-02-21. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2efa |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-19 |
| Domain age | 1.67 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2025-02-21 |
| Archive snapshots | 4 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 14 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about ledgerportal.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [solvprotocolverification.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solvprotocolverification.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [wqerweq.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/wqerweq.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [flockerztokenclaim.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flockerztokenclaim.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [api-polkastarter.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/api-polkastarter.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [voting-mefai-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/voting-mefai-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [solspin-8dn.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solspin-8dn.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [sale-creator-bid.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sale-creator-bid.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 22/100)
- [unich-quests-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/unich-quests-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [metacene.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/metacene.top), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 20/100)
- [itrustcapitaltaxreform.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/itrustcapitaltaxreform.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ledgerportal.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/ledgerportal.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-25.*