--- title: "Is liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app a Scam? Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app assessed: 2026-10-26 --- # Is liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 15 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png) _What liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This website is a single-page site hosted on a free subdomain of a developer hosting platform. Its page title presents it as "Jupiter: The Home of Onchain Finance", which suggests a crypto or decentralized-finance landing page. The subdomain name refers to a "live allocation page", so the apparent purpose is to present a token-allocation or onchain-finance interface to visitors. The captured page text is short. No product list, yield figures, leverage claims, or contact artifacts could be extracted from it, so the site's commercial model cannot be described beyond its onchain-finance branding. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present and are serious. The domain is **blacklisted**: multiple independent security engines classify it as malicious, and several major, well-regarded security vendors are among them. This alone places the site in an elevated-risk category regardless of its other characteristics. The site's behavior adds to the concern. When a visitor interacted with the page, its content changed substantially compared with the initial load, both in visible text and in layout. That pattern is consistent with cloaking, where a page shows one thing at first and something different after engagement. The site brands itself with the name of a widely known onchain-finance product but is served from a free, user-created subdomain on a hosting platform, and that subdomain name closely resembles the platform's own domain. Any real-world link between this site and the brand it displays could not be established. Branded landing pages of this kind are a common vehicle for wallet-phishing and fake token-allocation or airdrop lures. No two conflicting legal identities were found, and the sandbox saw no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or outbound data submissions. These observations slightly narrow the observed attack surface but do not offset the malicious classifications. Evidence: - Homepage: the page title presents the Jupiter onchain-finance brand on a free hosting-platform subdomain whose name resembles the platform domain, with no verifiable tie to that brand. - Reputation check: 15 security engines flagged the domain as malicious and 1 as suspicious, including three Tier-1 vendors (Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos), which triggered an external blacklist. - Behavioral sandbox: strong post-interaction cloaking was recorded, with a semantic content difference of about 31% and a visual difference of about 14%, across 3 successful runs. - Domain provenance: the domain was registered in 2026 (about 15 days old), with a single archive snapshot (1 snapshot, 2026, 1 year tracked), so no prior benign history exists. ### Regulatory Verification Notes Nothing in the evidence connects this site to a regulated financial entity. The site presents an onchain-finance brand but offers no verifiable regulatory standing or independently confirmed corporate identity. Third-party broker-reputation data returned no matching record, which is neutral and carries no weight in either direction. The valid certificate and recognizable hosting environment are generic platform features. They are not evidence that the site's operator is legitimate or authorized to offer financial services. The abuse reports recorded against a network address in the hosting environment relate to shared provider infrastructure and are discounted, so they play no part in this assessment. Evidence: - Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is OV-validated, issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, and valid to 2027-03-19. It identifies the hosting platform, not the site's operator. - Hosting: the site is served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US), where many unrelated sites share the same address space. - Homepage: the page offers a financial-style onchain brand, but the evidence reviewed contains no regulator reference or licensing statement tied to it. ### What to Verify Next Before any interaction, the claimed brand should be checked against its officially published domain, obtained from a trusted independent source such as the brand's verified social channels or a bookmarked address. The domain should not be reached through links, messages, or advertisements that led here. Any "allocation", "claim", or "airdrop" promise should be treated as unconfirmed until the genuine brand confirms it through its official channels. If the page is encountered in a message or advertisement, the sender or advertiser should be asked to confirm its origin through a separate, offline route. The official support or contact channels of the brand should also be confirmed independently. Internal security teams may wish to report the domain to the hosting platform and to browser-protection providers. Evidence: - Homepage: the page title claims a well-known brand while the address is an unrelated free subdomain, so the match with the official domain should fail on inspection. - Reputation check: the malicious classifications are current, so the page should not be opened on a device that holds wallet access or stored credentials. - Behavioral sandbox: content shifts after interaction, so a first visual impression of the page is not a reliable indicator of what a visitor is shown later. ### Summary Verdict The available evidence supports a clearly high-risk posture for this website. Confirmed malicious classifications from independent security sources and evasive page behavior outweigh the neutral and mildly positive technical hygiene. The domain's brand-style presentation is also unsupported by any verified identity. The site cannot be treated as trustworthy. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is delivered through Amazon-operated CDN infrastructure under AS16509, and all four observed addresses are edge servers. The origin server could not be observed, so the actual hosting location cannot be independently confirmed. This setup can also allow content to be changed quickly without any visible change in network location. The hosting is mainstream and its reputation is sound, which is a mitigating factor. It does not offset the external threat detections, because the platform hosts many unrelated sites and gives no assurance about this particular one. The abuse reports on a shared edge address are attributed to the provider's shared infrastructure rather than to this site. ### Closing Assessment The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection, or any financial interaction. At most, it should be viewed read-only from an isolated environment, and any exposure should be handled as a possible phishing event. Anyone who has already interacted with it should review wallet approvals and account credentials. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 03 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 04 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app. - The request stayed on liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-10. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 | | Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-10-10 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 15 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [portal-moonshot-0w6.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-0w6.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [portal-moonshot-jk0.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-jk0.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-efk.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-efk.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [portal-moonshot-n8x.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-n8x.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [portal-moonshot-oh9.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-oh9.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-cpx.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-cpx.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-u7p.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-u7p.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-d4w.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-d4w.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [eighc.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/eighc.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [europarquets.be](https://trustsniffer.com/report/europarquets.be), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23) - [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/liveallocationpage-ux.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-26.*