---
title: "Is livepumpsolstreamers.xyz a Scam? Trust Score 1/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "livepumpsolstreamers.xyz"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is livepumpsolstreamers.xyz a Scam? Risk Report, Score 1/100"
trust_score: 1
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/livepumpsolstreamers.xyz
assessed: 2026-10-25
---

# Is livepumpsolstreamers.xyz a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 1/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 1/100.** livepumpsolstreamers.xyz shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 11 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the livepumpsolstreamers.xyz homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/livepumpsolstreamers.xyz/screenshots/first.png)

_What livepumpsolstreamers.xyz served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

The website at livepumpsolstreamers.xyz is a single-page property titled "Pump". Its domain name points to a live-streaming theme tied to the Pump token-launch ecosystem on Solana. The captured homepage returned normally, but the evidence does not reliably show what it offers or which organisation operates it. It appears to be a recently created, crypto-themed destination whose commercial purpose is unconfirmed. Independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag it as malicious.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

This is the decisive area of the assessment. A confirmed external blacklisting applies, and a substantial group of independent security engines classify the domain as malicious, with a further group marking it suspicious. At least one major reputation source also associates the domain with known phishing activity. The specific nature of the detections is not itemised. Direct brand impersonation and conflicting legal identities were not separately established, so the risk rests on the reputational convergence and not on a named impersonated brand. The domain is only weeks old and carries a crypto-streaming name that borrows the vocabulary of a popular token-launch ecosystem. That pattern is typical of throwaway lookalike or lure domains that trade on a recognisable name. In the sandbox, the homepage made no external network calls, hidden forms or wallet-connection attempts. It also showed no clipboard manipulation. The page raised 18 console errors, which is consistent with an unpolished or hastily assembled build. These benign behavioural results do not offset the blacklisting, because a page can be switched to a malicious payload after a clean first impression. Evidence:

- Homepage and domain reputation: eleven security engines flagged the domain as malicious and three as suspicious, and a confirmed external blacklist applies.
- Registration: domain registered 2026-08-31 (~0.15 years, about 54 days old), so no track record exists.
- Web archive: 1 snapshot in total, first and last seen 2026-09-03 (1 year tracked), so the site has no meaningful history.
- Homepage behaviour: three sandbox runs recorded zero external requests and no wallet-connect or drainer activity, alongside 18 console errors.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured homepage identifies no operating company, registered address, licence or registration number, and no legal or terms pages were evidenced. For a site with crypto-oriented branding, that omission is a disclosure gap. On its own it would not prove fraud, but here it compounds an already severe reputational finding. Ownership opacity also applies: the registration record is incomplete and does not tie the domain to an identifiable operator. That is an administrative limitation and not an identity contradiction. The registration runs through Global Domain Group LLC, and the certificate is a basic domain-validated one. Both are routine and do not establish who runs the site. No third-party broker or regulator record matched the domain. Evidence:

- Homepage: no company name, licence, registration number or legal-entity disclosure was captured.
- Registration: registrar is Global Domain Group LLC; created 2026-08-31, expires 2027-08-31; owner details incomplete.
- Transport security: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV level), valid to 2026-11-29, with about 35 days remaining. Domain validation confirms control of the domain and nothing about the operator.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Any party considering engagement should first establish whether a legitimate organisation claims this domain. The way to do that is to look for a link to it from the official channels of the brand or project the name evokes, reached independently and not through this site. A related step is to confirm through the relevant financial or virtual-asset registry whether any named operator holds authorisation for the services implied by the branding. Because the blacklisting is current, any reconsideration should wait until independent reputation sources have cleared the domain and the operator has been identified through an offline route. Official support or contact channels should be confirmed independently, not through the site. Evidence:

- Homepage: no outbound identity, licence or official-channel references were captured to cross-check.
- Reputation: the current blacklisting and malicious classifications are the gating condition for any re-evaluation.
- Registration: a domain only weeks old gives no history to corroborate a claimed brand relationship.

### Summary Verdict

The available evidence supports a high-risk posture. A confirmed blacklisting and broad malicious classification by independent security sources dominate the assessment. Domain youth, an absent operating identity and a lack of any independent track record reinforce it. The benign sandbox behaviour and the valid certificate are insufficient to change this outcome.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is a Cloudflare edge address. The origin server could not be seen. This is a mitigating factor only. It reflects ordinary protective hosting that is freely available to any operator, including abusive ones. It also prevents independent verification of the true hosting location and can conceal rapid content changes behind a stable front. The domain's very young age and sparse subdomain footprint are unconfirmed heuristics and carry no independent weight beyond the verdict. The protections cannot offset the reputational findings.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection, token approvals or any payment or financial interaction. At most, passive read-only viewing from an isolated, non-sensitive environment is tolerable, and avoiding the site altogether is the safer course. Anyone who has already interacted with it should treat the credentials or wallet permissions involved as potentially compromised. They should rotate passwords and revoke any approvals granted.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, registration and ownership, behaviour in a sandbox.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)
- The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN`)

### 03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### 05 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of livepumpsolstreamers.xyz.

- The request stayed on livepumpsolstreamers.xyz. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under Global Domain Group LLC. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-08-31. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-03. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Global Domain Group LLC |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3033::ac43:a592 |
| Name servers | APOLLO.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, FRIDA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-29 |
| Domain age | 0.15 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-08-31 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-03 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 11 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about livepumpsolstreamers.xyz at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [livepumpsolstreamers.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/livepumpsolstreamers.live), same name on .live (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [claimequilibria.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claimequilibria.xyz), another .xyz site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 2/100)
- [gunicorn.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/gunicorn.xyz), another .xyz site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [mint-triple-t.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mint-triple-t.xyz), another .xyz site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [mygetnow.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mygetnow.xyz), another .xyz site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [sndcte.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sndcte.xyz), another .xyz site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [community-alignedlayer.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/community-alignedlayer.xyz), another .xyz site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 7/100)
- [winearndrops.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/winearndrops.xyz), another .xyz site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [vote-spectrafinance.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-spectrafinance.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [azxzzzzzzzz.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/azxzzzzzzzz.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/livepumpsolstreamers.xyz) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/livepumpsolstreamers.xyz · assessed 2026-10-25.*
