---
title: "Is lumiadashboard.org a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "lumiadashboard.org"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is lumiadashboard.org a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/lumiadashboard.org
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is lumiadashboard.org a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** lumiadashboard.org shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 5 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 73% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 205 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Risk |
| Domain age | 1 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (3 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YR1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the lumiadashboard.org homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/lumiadashboard.org/screenshots/first.png)

_What lumiadashboard.org served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

The website is a recently launched .org property branded as a "dashboard" under the name lumiadashboard. Its captured homepage returns a normal page of a few thousand characters, but the page title reads "Google", a name that has no evident connection to the domain. The visitor is shown a generic web front end whose commercial purpose or business model is not evident from the captured material. No product, service or operator is clearly presented.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and are the decisive factor in this assessment. The domain is **blacklisted**: several security engines, including a top-tier endpoint-security vendor, flag it as malicious. That convergence is a stronger indicator than any single detection. The homepage title mimics a major global search brand while the domain bears no relationship to that brand. This is a brand-lookalike pattern commonly used to borrow credibility, although no formal impersonation finding was recorded and the page analysis could not tie the site to any real-world entity. Behavioural testing also suggested **cloaking**: the page changed noticeably in appearance after interaction, and three inline scripts were classed as suspicious. Most outbound traffic was directed to third parties. Reputation records also carry a phishing-related marker for the domain. Separately, the shared delivery address the site resolves to has an extensive abuse-report history. Those reports attach to a multi-tenant address, so they cannot be pinned on this site alone, but they have not been discounted and they reinforce the cautionary picture. Together these signals point to a site that should not be trusted with sensitive interaction. Evidence:

- Domain registered 2026-09-08, about 44 days old, so the site has almost no operating history.
- Web archive holds only 3 snapshots, spanning 2026-09-17 to 2026-10-03 (1 year tracked), which is thin and recent.
- Sandbox testing recorded a suspicious cloaking result (visual change of about 12.7% after interaction), 3 suspicious inline scripts, and about 71% of network activity going to external hosts.
- The shared delivery address carries 205 abuse reports from 33 distinct reporters, the latest on 2026-10-22; 5 security engines rated the domain malicious and 1 rated it suspicious.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No licensing, registration or company disclosure could be established on the captured homepage, and the on-page disclosure position is unclear. No operator can be connected to the site. Ownership and governance transparency are limited, which is an administrative opacity finding and not an identity contradiction, because no conflicting legal entities were observed. No third-party broker or regulatory-database record matched this domain, so no external reputational context exists on this point. Nothing here supports treating the site as a regulated or supervised business. The transport-encryption certificate is a basic domain-validated one. It confirms an encrypted connection only and says nothing about who operates the site. Evidence:

- Domain registered through NameCheap, Inc.; the registrant record is incomplete.
- TLS certificate issued by YR1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-07 with 45 days remaining.
- Site served from AS54113 (FASTLY - Fastly, Inc., US).
- No broker or regulator database match was found for the domain.

### What to Verify Next

Any dealing should be preceded by independent confirmation of who operates the site. That means checking whether any company claims it, and whether it holds a licence, through the official registry of the relevant jurisdiction. Official contact channels should be confirmed through an independent, offline route. Any claimed association with the brand named in the page title should be checked against that brand's own official channels. The domain should be re-checked against threat-intelligence sources after any claimed clean-up. Until then, any content from the site should be treated as untrusted. Evidence:

- The homepage returned a normal response with roughly 3,200 characters of text, enough for a manual comparison of its branding claims against official sources.
- In 3 of 3 sandbox runs no wallet-connection prompts, hidden forms or credential forms posting to external hosts were seen, so inspection can be done without submitting any information.

### Summary Verdict

The site carries an elevated, high-risk trust posture. Confirmed external threat detections, brand-lookalike presentation and evasive page behaviour outweigh its few technical positives, and the operator's identity is not established. The available evidence does not support treating it as legitimate.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Fastly's CDN/WAF, and all four observed addresses are edge nodes of that provider. The origin server was not observable. Protective edge infrastructure is a mitigating factor only. It cannot offset the reputational and behavioural risks above, and it prevents independent verification of the true hosting location. Two unconfirmed heuristics, fragmented infrastructure and a very young domain with few subdomains, are consistent with the verdict but are not independent risks.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for logins, credential entry, payments or any financial interaction, and no files should be downloaded from it. Passive viewing in an isolated environment is the most that is appropriate until the operator's identity is established and the external threat listings are cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, behaviour in a sandbox, history in the web archive.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)
- The server address behind this site has a strong record of abuse reports. (External reputation `rule:EXT_ABUSEIP_SEVERE`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page carried inline scripts written in a style TrustSniffer treats as suspicious. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_SUSPICIOUS_INLINE_SCRIPTS`)

### 04 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 205 reports on hosting IP 185.199.108.153 (GitHub, Inc., Content Delivery Network), 73% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of lumiadashboard.org.

- The request for lumiadashboard.org ended on www.google.com, a different domain. (Watch)
- Registration is published under NameCheap, Inc.. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by registrar-servers.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-08. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-17. (Clear)
- It is hosted on FASTLY, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | NameCheap, Inc. |
| Hosting | FASTLY - Fastly, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 185.199.108.153 |
| Name servers | dns1.registrar-servers.com, dns2.registrar-servers.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (fastly) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-07 |
| Domain age | 0.12 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-08 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-17 |
| Archive snapshots | 3 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 5 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 73% confidence, 205 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about lumiadashboard.org at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [packscan.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/packscan.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [quicktent.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/quicktent.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100)
- [solovault.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solovault.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 17/100)
- [polinex.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/polinex.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [kryptaplus.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/kryptaplus.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [musk-trade.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/musk-trade.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [breezeclient.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/breezeclient.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [prestige-client.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/prestige-client.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100)
- [portal-moonshot-klu.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-klu.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-zpl.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-zpl.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/lumiadashboard.org) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/lumiadashboard.org · assessed 2026-10-22.*