---
title: "Is majata-nft.pages.dev Safe? Risk Report, Score 42/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "majata-nft.pages.dev"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is majata-nft.pages.dev Safe? Warning Signs, Score 42/100"
trust_score: 42
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/majata-nft.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-29
---

# Is majata-nft.pages.dev safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 42/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 42/100.** majata-nft.pages.dev is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-29 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 1.9 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (4 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the majata-nft.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/majata-nft.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What majata-nft.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-29. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

The website presented as "CyberKings – MajataNFT" is an NFT-themed project page published on a free subdomain of a shared web-hosting platform. Its homepage carries a modest amount of text, and its apparent purpose is to promote or sell NFT-related offerings. The captured content gives no reliable detail on the product mechanics, the team behind it, or the commercial terms of any sale or mint.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

This is the decisive factor in the assessment. The site is **currently blacklisted by an external blacklist source**, based on an external reputation check. At least one engine rates it malicious and others rate it suspicious. This is a confirmed, hard contradiction, and the site's other characteristics do not offset it. No brand impersonation, conflicting legal-entity names, identity inconsistency, or confirmed phishing kit was identified. The listing alone places the site in an elevated-risk category. The setting adds to the concern. NFT sale pages on disposable free-hosted subdomains are a common vehicle for wallet-draining mints and fake-drop schemes, because the operator can be replaced or the content swapped without a trace. This describes a general pattern. It is not a finding that this site operates such a scheme. Behavioural testing found no wallet-connection prompts, wallet-drainer routines, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, or cloaking. That is a mitigating observation, but it comes from a limited set of automated visits and does not clear the listing. The homepage generated a heavy volume of third-party calls and repeated browser errors. These were measured directly in sandbox runs. They are consistent with a loosely assembled template page, so they are discounted as proof of malicious intent. They still widen the data-exposure surface and remain a negative signal. Evidence:

- Homepage: an external reputation check shows the domain on a threat blacklist (1 engine malicious, 2 suspicious). This is a hard signal, and nothing in the captured evidence discounts it.
- Homepage behaviour: 93 external XHR/fetch requests and 12 external POST requests across 3 sandbox runs, with external traffic reaching 35.6% of requests and 9 console errors. 3 requests went to non-whitelisted destinations. These are negative signals, partly discounted because template-style pages often behave this way, but they are not dismissed.
- Homepage behaviour: no wallet-connect, wallet-drainer, clipboard-write, hidden-form, or cloaking activity was observed. This is a mitigating observation, limited to 3 automated runs.
- Domain provenance: ~1.86 years old, with only 4 archive snapshots spanning 2024-12-16 to 2024-12-25 (1 year tracked). This shows a short and thin public history, which is a weak negative signal rather than evidence of wrongdoing.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured evidence shows no financial, securities, or digital-asset registration. No regulated-entity record could be matched to the site, and no third-party broker-reputation record exists for it. The operator's real-world identity is unverified (status unknown, low confidence). The AI page analysis was unavailable, so the page was captured but its identity was not AI-verified. The site's name and title are therefore unanchored claims. They cannot be taken as evidence of who runs it. The valid transport-encryption certificate indicates only that the connection to the domain is encrypted. It does not show who controls the domain or whether the offering is lawful. Any NFT sale that promises returns or exclusive access should be treated as unregistered until the operator shows otherwise. Evidence:

- Homepage: the page is titled "CyberKings – MajataNFT" and is served from a shared-platform subdomain, so the domain name does not tie it to any identifiable business.
- Transport security: the TLS certificate was issued by WE1 as a domain-validated (DV) certificate, valid to 2026-12-24 (55 days remaining). DV validation checks domain control only, so this is a neutral technical signal and not an identity signal.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Before any interaction, the project's existence and official presence should be confirmed through channels that do not link back to this page. Examples are an established NFT marketplace listing, a verified social account, or a team announcement found independently. The operator's identity and any claimed registration should be checked with the relevant registry or regulator. The blacklist status should be rechecked on the reporting sources, since a recent compromise or clean-up would change the picture. If the site later publishes a mint contract address, it should be checked against the project's independently verified announcements, not the address shown here. Evidence:

- Homepage: the project name and title could not be matched to any verifiable operator in the captured evidence.
- Reputation: the blacklist listing is current, so any delisting or remediation notice should be confirmed with the listing sources.
- Domain history: the very short public record (4 snapshots, 2024-12-16 to 2024-12-25) offers no earlier track record to lean on.

### Summary Verdict

The site presents an elevated, clearly cautionary risk posture (low-trust band, score 41.5, classification confidence 0.75). A confirmed external blacklist listing outweighs the technical hygiene signals. The site's identity and legitimacy remain unestablished, and the available evidence is consistent with, but does not prove, a high-risk NFT property. It should be treated as high-risk until the listing is resolved and the operator is independently verified.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served entirely through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF. All four observed addresses are Cloudflare edge servers, and the origin server was not observable. Using a well-established provider and holding a valid certificate are mitigating factors only. They indicate that the traffic path is professionally run. They do not establish who operates the content, and they cannot offset the reputation risk. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent hosting verification and makes rapid content swaps harder to detect. Governance and ownership details are likewise not visible.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most. Wallet connections, credential entry, mint or purchase payments, and any approval of token permissions should be avoided. Anyone who has already interacted with it should review and revoke wallet permissions and check for unauthorised transactions.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-29 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)
- The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of majata-nft.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on majata-nft.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-12-16. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f73 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-24 |
| Domain age | 1.86 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-12-16 |
| Archive snapshots | 4 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about majata-nft.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 40/100)
- [dapps-sync.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dapps-sync.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 32/100)
- [participate-peaqnetwork.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/participate-peaqnetwork.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 32/100)
- [buttcoinmoney.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/buttcoinmoney.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [trumpmaga-dic.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trumpmaga-dic.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 48/100)
- [revs-eralabs.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/revs-eralabs.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 26/100)
- [redirectsolutionprotocol.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/redirectsolutionprotocol.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 42/100)
- [fluxbyte-zentrasmarthub.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fluxbyte-zentrasmarthub.pages.dev), a similar name (Low Trust, 40/100)
- [portal-moonshot-0bz.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-0bz.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [fomies.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fomies.xyz), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 29/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/majata-nft.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/majata-nft.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-29.*