---
title: "Is manindex.site Safe? Risk Report, Score 35/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "manindex.site"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is manindex.site Safe? Warning Signs, Score 35/100"
trust_score: 35
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/manindex.site
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is manindex.site safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 35/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 35/100.** manindex.site is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 11 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Never archived (No public history of this site) | Watch |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE2) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the manindex.site homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/manindex.site/screenshots/first.png)

_What manindex.site served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This is a newly established website presenting a Persian-language homepage titled "Home – Manindex". The captured page carries a substantial amount of text, but the evidence does not show a clearly defined product, service, or business model. Its apparent purpose therefore cannot be established from what it shows a visitor. It has been assessed as an unproven site with a confirmed adverse reputation signal.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Reputation screening produced a **confirmed blacklist hit** against this domain. One security engine rated it malicious and another rated it suspicious. No mainstream browser-protection list flagged it. The domain was registered only days before the assessment. A brand-new domain carrying an active blacklist entry is a classic pattern for throwaway infrastructure used in phishing or fraud campaigns, and it supports a clearly cautionary posture. No brand impersonation and no conflicting legal identities were observed. The risk therefore rests on the blacklist entry combined with the domain's extreme youth. Behavioral testing of the homepage was benign. Across repeated sessions the page loaded stably and made no calls to outside domains. It also showed no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, or credential posts to third parties. These observations are mitigating, but they describe only the page as served during testing. They do not offset the external detection, because content can be swapped quickly on a young domain. A moderate number of script errors appeared in the browser console, which suggests an unpolished build and carries little weight on its own. Evidence:

- Domain registered in October 2026 (about 10 days old, 0.03 years), with registration running to October 2027.
- External reputation screening: one engine malicious, one suspicious, and an active blacklist match on the domain.
- Homepage behavioral runs (3 of 3 successful) recorded zero external network requests, no wallet or clipboard activity, and no hidden or externally posting forms.
- Homepage console showed 8 script errors, and the page's structure changed only modestly after interaction.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The homepage presents no licensing, registration, or regulator references. It also lacks the legal and identity disclosures an operator handling money or credentials would be expected to publish. Third-party broker-reputation data yielded no match for this site. The operator's ownership details are incomplete, which is **ownership opacity** and not an identity contradiction. A missing license is a verification gap, not proof of fraud. In this case, though, the gap sits alongside a confirmed blacklist entry and a brand-new domain, so no mitigating regulatory standing exists. Nothing connects the site to an established real-world organization. Evidence:

- The homepage contains no company name, license number, or regulator reference.
- Registrar of record is GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com, with the owner record incomplete.
- Hosting network AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- TLS certificate issued by YE2 (domain-validated only), valid to 2027-01-11. This confirms encryption, not operator identity.

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, the operator should be identified through channels independent of the site: official business registries, regulator databases, and any organization the site claims to represent. If the site presents itself as a service connected to a known brand, that connection should be confirmed from the brand's own official channels, not from links on the site. The site's published contact channels should be confirmed independently as well. Reputation status should be re-checked after the owner has had time to respond, since a listing on a young domain may be remediated, disputed, or confirmed. Evidence:

- The homepage shows no verifiable operator identity to check against a registry.
- The blacklist match is current as of this assessment and should be rechecked over time.
- The domain's registration is about 10 days old, so no track record exists to rely on.

### Summary Verdict

The available evidence places this site in an elevated-risk posture. A confirmed adverse reputation signal, combined with a domain that has no history and no verifiable operator, outweighs the benign page behavior and the working transport encryption. The evidence does not identify who runs the site or what it offers. It does not support treating the site as legitimate.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF. All observed addresses are edge servers, and the origin host could not be observed. This is a mitigating factor only. It adds baseline resilience and credible transport security, but it also prevents independent verification of where the content is hosted and allows content to be swapped rapidly behind the edge. A heuristic indicator of infrastructure fragmentation is unconfirmed and carries no weight here.


### Closing Assessment

Interaction should be limited to passive, read-only viewing at most. No credentials, personal data, or payment details should be submitted, and nothing should be downloaded, until the operator is independently identified and the reputation listing is cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, registration and ownership, behaviour in a sandbox.

### 01 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### 04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of manindex.site.

- The request stayed on manindex.site. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-10-11. (Noted)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3031::6815:546d |
| Name servers | dave.ns.cloudflare.com, nina.ns.cloudflare.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE2 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-11 |
| Domain age | 0.03 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-10-11 |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | 0 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about manindex.site at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [winindex.site](https://trustsniffer.com/report/winindex.site), another .site site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 38/100)
- [openindex.site](https://trustsniffer.com/report/openindex.site), another .site site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 26/100)
- [motionindex.site](https://trustsniffer.com/report/motionindex.site), another .site site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 41/100)
- [bumcoinc.site](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bumcoinc.site), another .site site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 26/100)
- [portal-moonshot-0uw.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-0uw.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-gzf.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-gzf.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-cd8.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-cd8.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [tierlane.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tierlane.xyz), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 44/100)
- [portal-moonshot-swa.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-swa.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-muv.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-muv.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/manindex.site) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/manindex.site · assessed 2026-10-22.*