---
title: "Is memescandata.me a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "memescandata.me"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is memescandata.me a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 70
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/memescandata.me
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is memescandata.me a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** memescandata.me shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 70%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 1 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (2 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the memescandata.me homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/memescandata.me/screenshots/first.png)

_What memescandata.me served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This is a recently registered website on the .me top-level domain. Its name suggests a meme-token scanning or data service, but its actual content could not be reviewed. Automated capture of the homepage ended at a protective interstitial headed "Suspected Phishing", and only a very small amount of page text was returned. The site's products and business model therefore cannot be established from its own content. Its apparent purpose has to be inferred from the name alone, and the external reputation signals are decisive.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and substantial. Multiple independent reputation engines currently classify the domain as malicious or suspicious, and at least one major enterprise security vendor flags it, which amounts to a **confirmed blacklist listing**. The homepage was also met by a challenge page whose title warned of suspected phishing, which is consistent with those external detections. No brand impersonation and no conflicting legal identities were observed, and the page evidence is too thin to attribute the detections to a specific scheme. Behavioral testing showed heavy third-party activity: a large volume of cross-origin background requests and several outbound data posts, nearly all of it directed to external destinations. The page also produced many script errors and a very large burst of page rewrites after interaction. Testing found no wallet-connection attempts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or credential posts to external hosts. The absence of those behaviors does not offset the active reputation listings. Sensitive interactions on this domain carry elevated risk. Evidence:

- Homepage: the capture returned an access-denied status with an interstitial titled "Suspected Phishing", and only a brief text fragment was available.
- Domain provenance: registered 2026-09-10 (~41 days old, 0.11 years); the web archive holds 2 snapshots spanning 2026-09-10 to 2026-09-11 (1 year tracked).
- Reputation: 3 engines rated the domain malicious and 3 suspicious, and one tier-one vendor flagged it.
- Homepage behavior: 98 external background requests, 9 external posts, 22 console errors, and 1,523 page mutations after interaction; no wallet, clipboard, or hidden-form activity.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No licensing, registration, or legal-entity information could be assessed. The captured homepage carried no legal, terms, or about content, so the real-world operator is not independently connected to any named company or regulated activity. No third-party regulatory or broker record matched this domain. The reputational listings are a security-risk matter and not a regulatory finding. They do not show that the operator is unlicensed, and the site presents no licensing claim to test. The domain was registered through a mainstream registrar, but the domain's age is extremely short and the registrant details are redacted. Neither supports a claim of established standing. Evidence:

- Registry data: registered through NameSilo, LLC on 2026-09-10, expiring 2027-09-10, with the registrant shown as redacted.
- Transport security: the TLS certificate is issued by WE1 at domain-validation level only, valid to 2026-12-09 (about 48 days remaining). This confirms encryption but not operator identity.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Third-party records: no broker or regulator record matched the domain.

### What to Verify Next

The open question is whether the domain has any legitimate, documented operator. Any claimed relationship should be confirmed through official channels obtained independently of this site, such as a project's verified social accounts or a known exchange listing. If a company or product is claimed, its registration should be checked in the relevant corporate registry, and any financial-services claim should be checked against the relevant regulator's public register. The domain's reputation status should be re-checked after the site owner has had time to remediate or dispute the listings, since the same detections would also arise from a compromise. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed offline before any interaction. Evidence:

- Domain age and archive history are both under two months, so no long-standing track record exists to rely on.
- Active detections remain on the domain, and the homepage interstitial is still presented to visitors.
- No legal-entity name, registration number, or licence reference was available from the captured page.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high risk. Active, corroborated threat-intelligence detections on a very young domain outweigh its technically sound transport security and the absence of observed wallet or credential-harvesting behavior. Legitimacy is not supported, and operator identity remains unverified.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The domain resolves entirely to a major CDN and web-application-firewall provider, and all observed addresses are edge nodes. The origin server was not observable, so the real hosting location cannot be independently confirmed. This is a mitigating factor only. The protection indicates an established network environment and a valid certificate, but it cannot offset the active reputation detections, and it can mask rapid content changes behind the edge.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for account login, credential entry, wallet connection, or any payment or financial transaction, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Passive viewing is the most that is defensible, preferably from an isolated environment. Any outreach or link pointing to this domain should be treated as untrusted until its status is independently cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)

### 05 Registration and ownership
- The registration record withholds contact details for the operator. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN`)
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 15% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of memescandata.me.

- The request stayed on memescandata.me. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under NameSilo, LLC. (Clear)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-10. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-10. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | NameSilo, LLC |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3037::6815:1964 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-09 |
| Domain age | 0.11 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-10 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-10 |
| Archive snapshots | 2 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about memescandata.me at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [devwatchbuild.me](https://trustsniffer.com/report/devwatchbuild.me), another .me site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [scanbot.me](https://trustsniffer.com/report/scanbot.me), another .me site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [puntoblu.me](https://trustsniffer.com/report/puntoblu.me), another .me site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [mcas.me](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mcas.me), another .me site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [agomez.me](https://trustsniffer.com/report/agomez.me), another .me site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [3115ff.me](https://trustsniffer.com/report/3115ff.me), another .me site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [2ww.me](https://trustsniffer.com/report/2ww.me), another .me site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [telcoins-bank-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/telcoins-bank-com.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [vv-direct-website.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vv-direct-website.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [xrp-scans.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xrp-scans.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/memescandata.me) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/memescandata.me · assessed 2026-10-22.*