---
title: "Is multkeepsd.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "multkeepsd.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is multkeepsd.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/multkeepsd.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is multkeepsd.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** multkeepsd.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 6 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2.0 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (13 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the multkeepsd.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/multkeepsd.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What multkeepsd.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This web property is served from a subdomain of a shared, free web-publishing platform. The hostname is an unbranded, random-looking string. When the site was visited, it returned a hosting-provider interstitial titled as a suspected-phishing warning instead of ordinary content. No products, services or business model could be observed, so the site's purpose cannot be established. Its profile matches a disposable hosted landing page that could be used to stage fraudulent or malicious activity.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they are serious. Several independent security engines currently flag the domain as malicious, including two top-tier vendors. This amounts to a confirmed **blacklist** presence. The page shown to the automated visitor was a platform warning that classes the site as suspected phishing. The hostname also sits directly under a shared hosting platform's domain, so it closely resembles that platform's namespace. Any reputation the platform has does not carry over to an individual tenant subdomain. Behavioural testing found a heavy pattern of outbound activity. Most of the page's network requests went to third-party endpoints, and several outbound data submissions occurred. The page also changed its structure sharply after interaction and produced repeated script errors. The tests found no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms or credential posts to external hosts. That reduces the evidence for a specific drainer or credential-harvesting mechanism, but it does not offset the confirmed threat listings. No conflicting legal identities were found, because no legal identity is presented at all. Evidence:

- Homepage: the captured page was a hosting-provider interstitial titled as a suspected-phishing warning, with a blocked (403) response to the automated visitor.
- Reputation checks: two top-tier security vendors and several other engines flag the domain as malicious, and the domain also appears on an external blacklist.
- Behavioural sandbox, homepage: 81 external fetch/XHR calls and 5 external POSTs across 3 runs, 11 console errors, and a 1,508-node DOM mutation after interaction. No wallet-connect, clipboard-hijack or hidden-form behaviour was detected.
- Domain provenance: 13 archive snapshots from 2024 to 2026 (3 years tracked, first seen October 2024), so the domain is about 2 years old.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The evidence contains no licence, registration number, named legal entity or regulatory affiliation, and no third-party regulatory source confirms the site. Identity verification remains unresolved. No on-site disclosure can be assessed in a way that would support a legitimate operator. No broker-database record exists for the site, so there is no reputational context either way. This gap is a verification matter. The threat listings above, not the missing disclosures, are what drive the elevated risk assessment. The technical profile is typical of a generic hosted deployment. It gives no indication of a regulated or institutionally accountable operator. Evidence:

- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US, ARIN registry).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 with domain-validation (DV) only, valid to 2026-12-10 (48 days remaining). DV confirms control of the domain, not the identity of the operator.
- Legal and policy pages: no terms, privacy, about or licensing content was available in the captured evidence.

### What to Verify Next

Verification should start with the threat listings, because they are the decisive factor. Anyone assessing the site should check the current status of the malicious listings with the relevant security vendors. They should also check whether the hosting platform's abuse process has acted on the tenant. If the site is claimed to represent a brand or business, that entity should confirm through an independent, offline route that it operates this exact hostname. Official channels should be sourced from the entity's established website, not from this site. Any licence or registration claim should be checked directly with the relevant registry. Anyone who has already used the site should treat any submitted credentials as exposed. Evidence:

- Homepage: the platform's suspected-phishing interstitial indicates that an abuse classification already exists at the hosting layer.
- Reputation checks: the malicious detections come from multiple independent engines, so they can be re-checked with each vendor.
- Hostname: the random, unbranded name under a shared platform domain gives no indication of any real-world owner.

### Summary Verdict

The available evidence places this site in an elevated-risk, clearly cautionary posture. Active third-party malicious detections and a platform-level phishing warning outweigh the neutral technical hygiene, and the operator's identity is not independently established. The site should be treated as a probable fraud or malware vector until the listings are cleared.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and WAF. All four observed addresses (two IPv4 and two IPv6) are edge servers, and the origin host was not observable. The platform's bot-challenge layer was active during testing. This protection is a mitigating factor only. It shows that the hosting is mainstream and says nothing about the legitimacy of the tenant content behind it. The edge-only view also prevents independent verification of where the content is actually served from.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for login, credential entry, payments or any financial interaction, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Any access should be limited to read-only inspection in an isolated environment, and avoiding the site entirely is the safer course. Any link to it that was received unsolicited should be reported to the sender's organisation and to the hosting provider's abuse channel.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of multkeepsd.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on multkeepsd.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-10-02. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f19 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-10 |
| Domain age | 2.05 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-10-02 |
| Archive snapshots | 13 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 6 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about multkeepsd.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [isthatblep-airdrop.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/isthatblep-airdrop.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 8/100)
- [mugicateth-vip.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mugicateth-vip.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [sol212.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sol212.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [qudefi-ia.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/qudefi-ia.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [algorithmrectify.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/algorithmrectify.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 15/100)
- [w-20ab-delta-app.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/w-20ab-delta-app.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [karak-network-airdrops.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/karak-network-airdrops.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [shepsky-ai.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/shepsky-ai.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [322285.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/322285.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [3158-zs.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/3158-zs.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/multkeepsd.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/multkeepsd.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-22.*