---
title: "Is naruflix.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "naruflix.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is naruflix.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/naruflix.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is naruflix.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** naruflix.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 7 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 1.9 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (4 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the naruflix.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/naruflix.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What naruflix.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This is a project hosted on a shared, free developer-platform subdomain, and its name suggests a streaming or media theme. When the site was captured, visitors received a hosting-provider interstitial titled as a suspected-phishing warning in place of any readable site content. Its purpose and business model therefore cannot be established from the page itself. The deployment is recent, and its public presentation is minimal.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they drive the cautionary posture of this assessment. The site is currently on a **confirmed blacklist**: multiple independent security engines classify it as malicious, and two of the better-known commercial security vendors are among them. The hosting platform's own challenge page labels the site as suspected phishing, which is consistent with those detections. No conflicting legal identities and no explicit brand-impersonation evidence were observed. The risk therefore rests on the reputation and phishing-warning signals, not on a demonstrated lookalike of a named brand. Behavioural testing showed no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms or credential posts to outside parties, so the available evidence does not show how the site would harm a visitor. However, a very large share of page activity went to outside domains, with a heavy volume of background requests and repeated script errors. That pattern fits a thin or unstable front end that loads most of its content from elsewhere. Combined with the detections, it supports treating the site as unsafe for any login, credential entry or payment. Evidence:

- Homepage capture returned a Cloudflare-served phishing-warning interstitial in place of site content.
- Several independent threat-intelligence engines flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, including two prominent commercial vendors.
- Behavioural runs recorded 26 external background requests, about 95% of activity directed outside the site's own domain, and 20 console errors.
- Domain first observed 2024-12-07 (~1.9 years old); 4 archive snapshots spanning 2024–2025 (2 years tracked), a thin history that offers no established record of legitimate use.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site presents no identifiable operator, legal entity, licence or registration details, and its hosting arrangement offers no independent anchor for ownership. This is **ownership opacity**. It is a transparency gap that raises the cost of accountability if something goes wrong. It is not an identity contradiction, because no competing legal names were found. Nothing links the site to a regulated or recognised brand, and no third-party broker or regulatory-reputation entry matched it. The site should not be treated as a supervised or licensed service on any basis. Its shared-platform subdomain also means it has no independent domain identity of its own. Evidence:

- No operator, company or licensing information could be tied to the site; the only readable page content was the platform's warning interstitial.
- Served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-16. This confirms encryption, not the operator's identity.

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, confirm who operates the site through a channel independent of the site, and ask the person who supplied the link where it originated. Anyone who received the link through a message, advertisement or social post should check it against the official presence of the service it claims to represent. Official contact channels should be confirmed through an offline or separately sourced route. Access should be limited to passive viewing from an isolated, up-to-date browser, and nothing should be downloaded from the site. If the site is believed to belong to the user's own organisation, the hosting project owner should be contacted to review the flagging. Evidence:

- The site sits on a shared subdomain of a developer-hosting platform, so no standalone domain registration points to an accountable operator.
- The security engines' detections are current and remain unresolved.
- Behavioural testing showed no wallet or credential-capture activity, which is why passive viewing is the only use the evidence tolerates.

### Summary Verdict

The evidence converges on an elevated-risk, clearly cautionary posture. Active third-party threat detections and a platform-level phishing warning outweigh the neutral technical hygiene of the deployment. The operator's identity is unconfirmed, and the site cannot be considered trustworthy for any sensitive interaction.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all four observed addresses (two IPv4 and two IPv6) are Cloudflare edge servers. The origin server was not observable, so the actual hosting location cannot be verified independently, and content could be swapped without a visible change in network posture. The CDN, bot-challenge layer and valid encryption are mitigating factors only. They do not offset the external detections and do not demonstrate legitimacy.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as unsafe for login, credential entry, financial transactions and downloads. If it must be examined at all, it should be viewed read-only from an isolated environment. Any account details already entered should be changed promptly, and the link should be reported to the sender's platform or the security team.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of naruflix.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on naruflix.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-12-07. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2eea |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-16 |
| Domain age | 1.88 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-12-07 |
| Archive snapshots | 4 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 7 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about naruflix.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [smartwebdevfix3.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/smartwebdevfix3.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [uni-swap-live.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/uni-swap-live.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [list-voteokx.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/list-voteokx.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 15/100)
- [5202515772.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/5202515772.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 3/100)
- [owlto-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/owlto-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [worldlibertyfinanceal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/worldlibertyfinanceal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [hubble-3nh.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hubble-3nh.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [20213.cc](https://trustsniffer.com/report/20213.cc), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [2009rc.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/2009rc.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/naruflix.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/naruflix.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*