--- title: "Is nc4qsnh.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 18/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "nc4qsnh.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is nc4qsnh.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 18/100" trust_score: 18 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/nc4qsnh.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-22 --- # Is nc4qsnh.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 18/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 18/100.** nc4qsnh.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | | Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the nc4qsnh.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/nc4qsnh.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What nc4qsnh.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview The website is a minimal single-page site titled "Memepack", served from a free subdomain on a shared developer-hosting platform rather than from a branded domain of its own. A visitor sees only a short page of text, and the apparent purpose is a meme-themed product or token landing page. The page states no clear business model, operator, or product description. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present. An external reputation check currently lists the site on a **blacklist**, and a multi-engine scan returned malicious and suspicious detections against the domain. That combination is a confirmed adverse signal. It is not offset by the site's technical hygiene, which is limited to a valid certificate and mainstream hosting infrastructure. The site sits on a shared hosting-platform subdomain whose name closely resembles the platform's own parent domain, a pattern commonly used to borrow credibility. Brand impersonation and conflicting legal identities were not observed, and no phishing verdict or wallet-drainer behaviour was confirmed. In sandbox testing the homepage made heavy use of third-party services. Most of its network activity went to external destinations, including dozens of background data requests and several outbound POST submissions, and a portion of these went to destinations outside the set of widely recognised services. The page also raised repeated script errors. A page with so little visible content should not need this much external communication, so where the submitted data goes is unexplained. Clean runs on wallet-connection, clipboard-tampering, hidden-form and cloaking tests do not remove the blacklist concern. Evidence: - Homepage: a minimal page titled "Memepack" with only a short block of text and no identifiable operator or product description. - Homepage sandbox behaviour: 63 external background requests and 10 outbound POSTs, 3 of them to non-whitelisted destinations, with external traffic reaching up to 93.4% of requests in a run. There were 11 console errors across 3 runs. - Reputation scan: 1 engine reported the domain malicious and 2 suspicious, and an external blacklist listing is active. - Domain naming: the site is a subdomain of a shared hosting platform and closely resembles the platform's parent domain. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The site discloses no licence, registration number, or legal entity on the captured homepage. The real-world operator could not be independently connected to the site, and no third-party broker or regulator match was found. These are verification gaps rather than proof of wrongdoing, but they matter more here because the adverse reputation signal is confirmed. The site presents nothing that would support a claim to regulated or established status. An encrypted connection is present, but it is a baseline measure that says nothing about who operates the site. Evidence: - Homepage: no legal entity name, licence, or registration reference appears in the captured content. - Transport encryption: a domain-validated certificate issued by WE1, valid to 2026-12-29, which confirms control of the domain but not operator identity. - Hosting: the site resolves to AS13335 (CLOUDFLARENET, Cloudflare, Inc., US). ### What to Verify Next The adverse reputation listing should be re-checked directly with the listing source and with other independent reputation services before any engagement. Anyone claiming to represent the project should be asked to provide a verifiable legal entity and official channels through an independent route, not through links on this page. Any claimed association with a known brand or token should be checked on that brand's own official channels. The hosting platform's abuse-reporting process can confirm whether the subdomain is under review. Evidence: - Homepage: it names no operator, so any association with a known project must come from outside the page. - Reputation scan: the external blacklist listing is active at the time of analysis. - Domain: it is a platform-assigned subdomain, so the platform itself holds the registration and abuse-handling relationship. ### Summary Verdict Available evidence supports an elevated-risk assessment. A confirmed external blacklist listing, together with unexplained third-party data traffic from a near-empty page of unverified origin, outweighs the site's basic technical hygiene. No mitigating signal is strong enough to override the adverse reputation finding. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is delivered through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is a Cloudflare edge address. This is a mitigating factor only, because it indicates mainstream hosting and says nothing about the operator's legitimacy. Edge-only visibility also means the origin server could not be independently observed, so the underlying host cannot be verified and content could be swapped quickly without any change in the front-end address. ### Closing Assessment Account login, credential entry, wallet connections, and any payment or financial interaction with this site should be avoided. At most, it should be viewed passively from an isolated browser until the reputation listing is resolved and an accountable operator is identified. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`) - The page exchanged network traffic with destinations TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_TRAFFIC`) - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`) ### 03 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of nc4qsnh.pages.dev. - The request stayed on nc4qsnh.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2c8b | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-29 | | Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about nc4qsnh.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [sitemk63isk5921x.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sitemk63isk5921x.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 6/100) - [snapshots-argus-102.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/snapshots-argus-102.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [votes-virtualagent-21.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-virtualagent-21.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [mrmigglesbase-appclaim.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mrmigglesbase-appclaim.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [mainetsapps.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mainetsapps.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [abster-zr41n3r-sol.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/abster-zr41n3r-sol.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [togethers.tv](https://trustsniffer.com/report/togethers.tv), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [meteorrejects.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/meteorrejects.net), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 2/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/nc4qsnh.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/nc4qsnh.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-22.*