---
title: "Is newtrustcard.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "newtrustcard.vercel.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is newtrustcard.vercel.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/newtrustcard.vercel.app
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is newtrustcard.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** newtrustcard.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 6 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 85 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 1 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | 3 snapshots (3 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the newtrustcard.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/newtrustcard.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What newtrustcard.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a subdomain on a shared application-hosting platform's public namespace. A visitor reaches only a bare placeholder page titled "Temporary Error", with about two sentences of text and no products, navigation, company description, or legal pages. Its apparent purpose and business model cannot be determined from what it presents. Its trust-themed, card-related hostname suggests a possible payment or security service, but the page does not say so.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The site has **confirmed contradictory signals**. Several independent security engines currently flag it as malicious or suspicious, and it is **blacklisted** on external threat lists. The detections do not specify a threat category, so the evidence supports a confirmed adverse reputation but not a named attack type. No phishing, brand-impersonation, or conflicting legal-identity findings were recorded. A cluster of abuse reports does exist against one of the site's serving addresses. That address belongs to the provider's shared, multi-tenant delivery network, and the reports carry no confidence against this site, so they are discounted and not counted against it. The decisive concern is the combination of an adverse external reputation, a hostname that is only days old, and a placeholder page that discloses nothing, since this pattern is typical of disposable infrastructure staged ahead of later content. The capture also resolved under a different subdomain name than the one requested, which points to redirection or content that can change after review. The page showed no cloaking, no hidden forms, and no wallet or credential-capture behavior in the sandbox runs, but that only describes a nearly empty page and does not clear the site. Evidence:

- Homepage: a placeholder error page with minimal text, with no stated service, operator, or contact route.
- Homepage capture: the page was served under a different subdomain name than the one analysed, a hostname inconsistency.
- Domain provenance: registration continuity of about one day; web archive holds only 3 snapshots, all from 2026 (1 year tracked).
- Sandbox behavior: 3 of 3 runs succeeded, with no external requests, no password forms, and no wallet or clipboard activity.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site exposes no terms, privacy policy, about page, company name, licence, or registration number, so there is nothing to assess against a regulatory framework. Ownership and governance are opaque, and the real-world operator is not independently connected to any person or brand. Nothing in the evidence suggests the site is a regulated or authorised entity. No third-party broker or regulatory-review record matched the site, so no reputational signal of that kind exists either way. Because the site has no content, its transport security says nothing about legitimacy. A valid certificate shows only that the connection is encrypted. Evidence:

- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-11-27.
- Homepage: no legal, licensing, or corporate-identity disclosures of any kind.

### What to Verify Next

Anyone who reached this address through a message, advertisement, or QR code should confirm the exact hostname and the sender's authenticity through a separate, independent channel. Any claimed brand or service should be confirmed through its officially published channels, which should be found independently and not through this address. If the operator claims to offer a regulated financial or card-related service, the claim should be checked against the relevant public regulator register before any engagement. A later re-assessment is worthwhile once the placeholder is replaced with real content, because the current reputation and content may change. Evidence:

- Homepage: no operator name or service description to cross-check.
- External reputation: current adverse flags remain unresolved and would need to clear before the site is reconsidered.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is one of elevated risk. A confirmed adverse external reputation, a very recently established hostname, and an uninformative placeholder page converge on a site that should be treated as untrusted. Benign behavior in testing and a valid certificate do not offset these signals.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through a trusted content-delivery and web-protection network. All six observed addresses are edge servers, and the origin server was not observable. This reduces exposure to direct attack and reflects mainstream hosting, but it is only a mitigating factor. It also prevents independent verification of the true host, and content behind the edge can be swapped quickly. It cannot offset the reputation risk.


### Closing Assessment

Account login, credential entry, and any payment or financial interaction should be avoided entirely. At most, the site should be viewed passively from a protected, isolated browser environment, and no file should be downloaded from it.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 85 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.3 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of newtrustcard.vercel.app.

- The request for newtrustcard.vercel.app ended on livesefty.vercel.app, a different domain. (Watch)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 216.198.79.3 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 6 |
| Edge IP addresses | 6 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | 0.00 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | 3 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 6 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 85 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about newtrustcard.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [tron-risk-check.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tron-risk-check.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [mintest-phi.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mintest-phi.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100)
- [claim-noderzz-s1.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-noderzz-s1.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [send-secure-trustwallet-usdt-bip20.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-secure-trustwallet-usdt-bip20.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [mmmm-sepia-nine.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mmmm-sepia-nine.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [u-lovat-six.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/u-lovat-six.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [stusdt-swap.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stusdt-swap.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [dappz-uxlinks.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dappz-uxlinks.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 22/100)
- [lab-revolution.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/lab-revolution.live), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 4/100)
- [dex-xrpl.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dex-xrpl.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/newtrustcard.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/newtrustcard.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-22.*