---
title: "Is nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 25/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is Pages a scam? nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev 25/100"
trust_score: 25
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-11-01
---

# Is Pages a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment of nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev: 25/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 25/100.** nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-11-01 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2.2 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (8 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-11-01. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

Satoshi Panda is a promotional single-page website for a meme-coin project. It presents itself as "The Happy Meme Coin" with "BTC Rewards" and is built around an NFT and token theme. It sits on a free subdomain of a public static-site hosting platform rather than on a dedicated branded domain. Its apparent purpose is to market a speculative crypto token and solicit participation in a reward-based token offering.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The assessment is clearly cautionary, because contradictory signals are present. Multiple independent threat-reputation sources currently flag the site as malicious or suspicious, and it is **confirmed as blacklisted** on that basis. This is the decisive factor. No conflicting legal identities and no brand impersonation were observed. The risk therefore arises from the blacklisting itself and not from identity inconsistency. The homepage's positioning compounds it: a meme coin promising "BTC Rewards" is a pattern commonly used to attract speculative deposits, and the page offers no verifiable substance behind the reward claim. Behavioural testing found no wallet-drainer activity, clipboard hijacking, hidden forms or cloaking. It did record heavy third-party request traffic, which means a visitor's browser is in constant contact with external services the site does not clearly account for. These clean behavioural results do not offset the blacklisting. The domain is also young, and the page-level behaviour and history are too thin to show a stable, legitimate operating record. Evidence:

- Homepage: titled as a meme coin with BTC rewards, with no independently verifiable reward mechanics or operator named.
- Reputation checks: 3 malicious and 1 suspicious detections, plus an external blacklist hit.
- Homepage behavioural run: 109 external XHR requests, 18 external POSTs, 6 non-whitelisted external requests, 8 console errors, and external traffic reaching about 80% of activity in one run.
- Domain provenance: registered about 2.2 years ago (first archived August 2024), with 8 archive snapshots over 2024–2026 (3 years tracked).

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site gives no regulatory standing, licence or registration reference for its token or reward offering. It also gives no legal entity, terms or policy pages from which an operator could be identified. Its real-world operator therefore cannot be tied to any accountable party. This is a verification gap and is not by itself evidence of fraud, but here it sits alongside the confirmed blacklisting. No broker-reputation profile was matched, so there is no third-party regulatory context either way. A token that promises rewards would normally be expected to disclose the issuing entity and applicable investor-protection information. None is present. Evidence:

- Homepage: no company name, licence number, jurisdiction or legal-entity disclosure.
- Site structure: no terms, privacy or risk-disclosure pages were identified.
- Transport security: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-23. Domain-validated encryption confirms only the connection, not who operates the site.

### What to Verify Next

The site's claim that it pays "BTC Rewards" should be tested against independent sources. These include a public token contract, a recognised blockchain explorer listing, and project announcements on channels that can be confirmed apart from this page. Any licensing or registration claim should be checked directly with the relevant financial regulator's public register, not by relying on the site. The official contact and support channels should be confirmed through an independent route before any interaction. Users should also confirm that the project exists outside this hosted subdomain, for example on an established domain with a documented history. Evidence:

- Homepage: reward and token claims are made without a linked contract address or audit.
- Hosting location: the site runs on a shared platform subdomain, so the domain gives no branded ownership signal.
- Archive history: only a short, sparse record exists, which gives no earlier track record to compare against.

### Summary Verdict

The available evidence supports an elevated-risk posture. The decisive factor is the confirmed adverse reputation, and that factor outweighs the site's technically clean behaviour. The site's legitimacy and operator identity are unestablished, and the overall assessment is clearly cautionary.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served through Cloudflare (AS13335, United States), and all observed addresses are CDN edge nodes. The origin server was not observable. The transport certificate is valid and issued by a recognised authority. This protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only. It shows that the site is competently hosted and says nothing about the legitimacy of its operator. It does not offset the adverse reputation findings, and the edge-only view prevents independent hosting verification.


### Closing Assessment

Interaction should be limited to passive viewing. Users should not log in, connect a wallet, submit credentials or personal data, or send funds or tokens through this site. Anyone considering the project should use only independently verified channels.


_Written analysis generated 2026-11-01 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- Many of the responses the page received looked generated rather than served normally. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_SYNTHETIC_RESPONSES_HIGH`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page exchanged network traffic with destinations TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_TRAFFIC`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-08-20. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2c51 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-23 |
| Domain age | 2.20 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-08-20 |
| Archive snapshots | 8 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [99bitcoins-31o.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/99bitcoins-31o.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [rftgjfgjhfgdj.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rftgjfgjhfgdj.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [merlin-68m.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/merlin-68m.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [gggghgj.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/gggghgj.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [zerolend-ddr.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/zerolend-ddr.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [app-shido-io.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/app-shido-io.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 20/100)
- [dbridger.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dbridger.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [modal-api.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/modal-api.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [phnixxrp.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/phnixxrp.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-p35.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-p35.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 30, 2026: 72 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-30)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/nft-satoshipanda.pages.dev · assessed 2026-11-01.*