---
title: "Is nightbazaar.fun Safe? Risk Report, Score 31/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "nightbazaar.fun"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is nightbazaar.fun Safe? Warning Signs, Score 31/100"
trust_score: 31
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/nightbazaar.fun
assessed: 2026-10-21
---

# Is nightbazaar.fun safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 31/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 31/100.** nightbazaar.fun is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | Night Bazaar is a pre-launch Web3 game in which users pay ETH to rent stalls and buy random mystery bags that pay prizes from a shared pot, with a future $HAGGLE token and burn promised. The page gives no verifiable team, legal entity, audit, or contract-verification evidence for these ETH deposits, so the economic model is high-risk. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | None flagged it (VirusTotal) | Clear |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 131 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 22 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (2 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YR2) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the nightbazaar.fun homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/nightbazaar.fun/screenshots/first.png)

_What nightbazaar.fun served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- VirusTotal and Google Safe Browsing had no flags for this domain; its hosting IP carries AbuseIPDB reports below the confidence level TrustSniffer treats as a flag.

## Full analysis


### Overview

Night Bazaar is a newly launched, pre-release Web3 browser game branded around a forthcoming "$HAGGLE" token. The homepage presents a grid of twenty numbered market stalls that visitors rent with ETH. Visitors can also buy randomized "mystery bags" whose contents pay out from a shared prize pot. The apparent business model is a pay-to-play game of chance, with fees funding stall keepers, a prize pool, and a promised future token buy-and-burn.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

No contradictory signals were observed. There are no confirmed threat-listing hits, no phishing or brand-impersonation indicators, and no conflicting legal identities. One reputation source returned a single unconfirmed "suspicious" flag with no malicious detections, which is a soft signal only. The risk here comes from the mechanics of the offer, not from any impersonation. The homepage has visitors pay 0.0005 ETH to rent a stall for three days, or 0.0001–0.01 ETH per bag. Each bag sends 20% to the stall keeper and 80% to the pot, with the stated 20% buy-and-burn share dedicated to a token that has not launched. Advertised prizes are a "Jade idol" at 1-in-100 odds worth 12% of the pot, a "Silver" tier at 5-in-100 worth 2%, and a "Bronze" tier at 14-in-100 worth 0.5%. Everything else is an unvalued "Trinket". A "festival night" on day three triples the idol, and "holders" get two daily rolls and keep the better one. On day fourteen the top-earning stall becomes "Market Master" and takes the entire remaining pot. This is a winner-take-all structure whose payouts depend on later deposits, and the page offers no way to confirm that the pot, odds, or payout logic work as described. The page also advertises a "burn" tied to a token that does not yet exist, so a core value claim cannot be checked today. The site sits at launch state, with an empty pot and no sales, so the track record is empty. Nothing observed amounts to a confirmed scam, but the economics are opaque and high-stakes.


Evidence:
- Homepage: stall rent of 0.0005 ETH per three days and bag prices of 0.0001–0.01 ETH, with a 20% keeper / 80% pot split per bag.
- Homepage: tiered prize table (1-in-100, 5-in-100, 14-in-100) and a day-fourteen winner-take-all "Market Master" payout, with no explanation of how odds or payouts are enforced.
- Homepage: the pot shows 0 ETH and bags sold shows 0, so no operating history exists. "$HAGGLE isn't out yet", yet the burn share is already collected in ETH.
- Domain provenance: registered 2026-09-27 (~23 days old), with 2 archive snapshots, both captured on 2026-09-27.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site claims no license or registration and publishes no legal entity, named team, terms, refund policy, or risk disclosure. The homepage gives no audit report and no contract-verification evidence for the deposits it invites. Because the mechanics resemble a game of chance with randomized, pot-funded prizes, the absence of any stated gaming authorization or jurisdictional restriction is a material disclosure gap. This is a transparency shortfall, not proof of wrongdoing. Ownership and governance are opaque, and that is a separate matter from any identity contradiction, since only one site identity is presented. No third-party broker or regulator listing was matched, so no external reputational context exists in either direction. Registration through a mainstream registrar and a valid certificate show only basic hygiene, not operator identity.


Evidence:
- Homepage: no legal entity, team, license, audit, terms, or refund and risk language appears anywhere on the page.
- Domain registered 2026-09-27 through NameCheap, Inc., expiring 2027-09-27.
- TLS certificate issued by YR2 (domain-validated only, which does not confirm who operates the site), valid to 2026-12-26.
- Served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Verification should start with the on-chain facts the page invites users to rely on. The "Game contract" and "Token" links should be checked on a public block explorer for verified source code, owner or admin privileges, and whether funds can be withdrawn outside the described payout rules. An independent smart-contract audit should be located, and its scope and the audited contract address should be matched to the one the site uses. The legality of paid, randomized-prize games should be confirmed for the participant's own jurisdiction, along with any gaming authorization the operators hold. The project's identity should be corroborated through its linked social account and other independent channels over a route not supplied by the site itself, including who is behind the stalls, the token, and any support channel. The token contract address shown as "CA" should be checked against the one posted by those channels once the token launches.


Evidence:
- Homepage: "Game contract" and "Token" links, plus a "CA" copy control for the token address, are the artifacts to check on an explorer.
- Homepage: an X link and a chart link are the only visible outbound references for confirming the team and the token.
- Homepage: no audit statement or named auditor, so any audit claim must be found independently.

### Summary Verdict

Available evidence places this site in a low-trust, cautionary category, driven mainly by what it is rather than by any detected attack. It is a very new, unproven pay-to-play game whose value flows cannot be independently verified and whose operators are unidentified. No hostile or impersonating activity was found, so the assessment is one of unestablished credibility and high financial exposure, not confirmed malice.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site resolves to a single address on a shared edge network operated by Vercel on Amazon-hosted infrastructure. Only edge servers were visible, so the underlying origin could not be independently assessed. A large number of abuse reports exist against that shared address, but they attach to the common provider infrastructure used by many unrelated sites, carry no confidence of abuse, and are discounted accordingly. The reputable hosting is a mitigating factor only and says nothing about the legitimacy of the operator. Content can also be changed quickly behind such a layer, and the young domain's sparse DNS footprint leaves little baseline to measure against.


### Closing Assessment

Any interaction should be treated as a speculative, high-stakes purchase. Participation should be limited to amounts that could be lost entirely, and only after the contract and audit checks above are complete and the operators have been identified through independent channels.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by page content, history in the web archive, hosting and network.

### 01 Page content
- The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW`)
- The page content shows three or more warning signs that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_STRONG`)
- The review of the page content rated it moderate risk. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RISK_MED`)
- The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME`)

### 02 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 131 reports on hosting IP 76.76.21.21 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of nightbazaar.fun.

- The request stayed on nightbazaar.fun. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under NameCheap, Inc.. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by registrar-servers.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-27. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-27. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | NameCheap, Inc. |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 76.76.21.21 |
| Name servers | dns1.registrar-servers.com, dns2.registrar-servers.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 1 |
| Edge IP addresses | 1 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YR2 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-26 |
| Domain age | 0.06 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-27 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-27 |
| Archive snapshots | 2 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 0 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 131 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about nightbazaar.fun at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [fomochart.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fomochart.fun), another .fun site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-wzp.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-wzp.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [hyprliquid-app.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hyprliquid-app.pages.dev), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-ota.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-ota.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-vyh.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-vyh.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [vote-okxpolls-903.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-okxpolls-903.pages.dev), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-yri.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-yri.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-npp.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-npp.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-fxg.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-fxg.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [hyperliqapp.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hyperliqapp.xyz), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 36/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/nightbazaar.fun) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/nightbazaar.fun · assessed 2026-10-21.*