--- title: "Is noderunner.bond a Scam? Trust Score 18/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "noderunner.bond" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is noderunner.bond a Scam? Risk Report, Score 18/100" trust_score: 18 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/noderunner.bond assessed: 2026-10-22 --- # Is noderunner.bond a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 18/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 18/100.** noderunner.bond shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 1 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (3 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE2) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the noderunner.bond homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/noderunner.bond/screenshots/first.png) _What noderunner.bond served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview This website is a minimal single-page site on the rarely used .bond domain extension. Its homepage carries the title "Send USDT" and only a few hundred characters of visible text. It presents itself as a stablecoin transfer service, and its name suggests a crypto-infrastructure theme. No product catalogue, company narrative or service description appears on the page, so its business model cannot be determined from its content. The only evident purpose is to prompt visitors toward a USDT transfer. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present. Multiple independent threat-detection engines currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and the domain is **blacklisted** according to external reputation sources. This is the decisive factor in the assessment. Taken with a domain that is only weeks old, a bare homepage that solicits "Send USDT" and carries no accountable business context, the pattern fits the profile of a short-lived crypto-payment lure. No conflicting legal entity names or brand impersonation were observed, and no phishing form was identified on the page. The page-behaviour tests were largely clean. They found no wallet-connection prompts, no wallet-drainer activity, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden or external credential forms and no cloaking. The few outbound background requests all went to recognised destinations. Clean behaviour on a single landing page does not offset the threat-intelligence detections. A page this minimal can change quickly, and the transfer step could be introduced or altered without notice. Evidence: - Homepage: titled "Send USDT", with very little text and no stated operator, product description or service terms. - Reputation checks: two engines rated the domain malicious and two rated it suspicious, alongside a separate external blacklist listing. - Domain registered 2026-09-17 (~34 days old), a very recent registration at the time of assessment. - Web archive: 3 snapshots between 2026-09-17 and 2026-10-09 (1 year tracked), so there is no prior history of legitimate use. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The homepage gives no legal entity, licence, registration number, jurisdiction or terms of service. No accountable operator can be connected to the site, and its real-world identity remains unverified. A site that invites stablecoin transfers would normally be expected to show regulatory standing. The absence of such disclosure is a verification gap in its own right, but the blacklist listing and detections above are what drive the cautionary posture. No third-party broker or regulatory database entry was matched for this name, so there is no external reputational context either way. The domain's registration details are shielded by a privacy service, which is treated here as an administrative matter and not as evidence of wrongdoing. Evidence: - Homepage: no company name, licence reference, physical address or legal pages are shown. - Registration: Namecheap Inc. is the registrar, with registration running to 2027-09-17 and owner details withheld by a privacy service. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc.), US. - Transport encryption: a DV certificate issued by YE2, valid to 2026-12-16. This confirms an encrypted connection only and says nothing about the operator. ### What to Verify Next Do not rely on the site to establish its own credibility. If any business relationship or payment is under consideration, the claimed operator should be identified through an independent route, such as a corporate or financial-services registry, and asked to confirm that this exact domain is theirs. Any wallet address or payment instruction taken from the site should be treated as unconfirmed until the counterparty verifies it through a separately established channel. Official support and contact details should be sourced from outside the site. Security teams should recheck the domain's threat-intelligence status before allowing it through corporate controls. Evidence: - Homepage: no operator identity or payment-recipient details are given that could be checked against a registry. - Reputation checks: current detections mean the domain's status should be re-queried before any allow-listing decision. - Archive: no earlier site content exists to compare against or to establish continuity of ownership. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high risk. Confirmed blacklist and threat-detection findings combine with a very young domain, thin content and no verifiable operator. The positive signals present are technical hygiene only, and they do not offset the reputational evidence or establish legitimacy. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is served entirely through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is a Cloudflare edge address. The origin server is not observable, so the hosting behind the site cannot be assessed independently, and content could be swapped behind the edge unnoticed. The valid TLS certificate and mainstream hosting provider are mitigating factors only. They are generic to any site using this service, including malicious ones, and they cannot offset the reputational findings. ### Closing Assessment The site should not be used for login, credential entry, payments or any transfer of funds. Any interaction should be limited to passive viewing, preferably from an isolated environment. Anyone who has already sent funds or shared information through it should contact their payment provider or exchange immediately. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN`) ### 03 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 04 Registration and ownership - The registration record withholds contact details for the operator. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN`) - Registration details are held behind a privacy service, so no operator is named publicly. This is common and legal, and it also means there is nobody to check. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_PRIVATE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 15% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of noderunner.bond. - The request stayed on noderunner.bond. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under NAMECHEAP INC. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-09-17. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-17. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | NAMECHEAP INC | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3036::ac43:b4e0 | | Name servers | JANET.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, REESE.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | YE2 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-16 | | Domain age | 0.09 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-09-17 | | Archive first seen | 2026-09-17 | | Archive snapshots | 3 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about noderunner.bond at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [ecosystem-boros.bond](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ecosystem-boros.bond), another .bond site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 16/100) - [portal-moonshot-8kj.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-8kj.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [revenuetopup.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/revenuetopup.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [sigmabull.vip](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sigmabull.vip), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [revenuesearchs.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/revenuesearchs.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-os5.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-os5.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-oht.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-oht.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [cashmereexchange.asia](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cashmereexchange.asia), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [paulcromford.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/paulcromford.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 7/100) - [claimnpc-0qn.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claimnpc-0qn.live), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23) - [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/noderunner.bond) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/noderunner.bond · assessed 2026-10-22.*