--- title: "Is noxa.finance a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "noxa.finance" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is noxa.finance a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/noxa.finance assessed: 2026-10-27 --- # Is noxa.finance a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** noxa.finance shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 3 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Never archived (No public history of this site) | Watch | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the noxa.finance homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/noxa.finance/screenshots/first.png) _What noxa.finance served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This website is a newly established domain on the finance top-level domain. Its landing page carries the title "fastpanel" and only a few hundred characters of visible text. It shows no identifiable product catalogue, company description or service terms, so its apparent purpose and business model cannot be established from what it presents to a visitor. The branding implies a financial or control-panel-style service, but the page does not describe one. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This is the decisive area of the assessment. Independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag the domain, and several security engines report it as malicious or suspicious, including one major security vendor. These hits amount to a **confirmed blacklist** listing and drive the cautionary posture. No conflicting legal identities, brand impersonation or phishing-page behaviour were observed, because the site exposes no identity content that could conflict. The danger rests on reputation and on the domain's age profile. The domain was registered only a few months ago, which is typical of short-lived infrastructure. Its name also visually resembles a well-known global platform brand, which is a lookalike pattern to bear in mind, not proof of impersonation. Behavioural testing found no wallet-connection prompts, wallet-drainer routines, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms or credential posts to external destinations. Nearly all observed request traffic went to third-party origins and the page threw repeated console errors. That points to a thin or unfinished front end that relies heavily on externally loaded resources. The absence of drainer behaviour does not offset the external threat detections. Evidence: - Homepage: external reputation sources currently list the domain as malicious or suspicious, with a major security vendor among those flagging it. - Domain registration: created 2026-07-11 (~0.29 years, ~107 days old), registered through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. - Homepage behaviour: 27 external XHR/fetch calls and 9 external POST requests across three test runs, up to 97.6% of requests going to external destinations, and 9 console errors. No wallet, clipboard or hidden-form abuse was detected. - Homepage content: the title is "fastpanel" with about 396 characters of text, giving no basis to link the site to a recognised brand or operator. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured pages contain no legal entity name, licence or registration number, regulator reference, terms of service or privacy policy. For a domain on the finance top-level domain, this is a significant disclosure gap. The identity of the real-world operator could not be connected to any person or company. Both ownership and governance transparency are limited. The registration record is incomplete as to the registrant, so ownership cannot be determined from public records. These are verification limitations. By themselves they are not evidence of wrongdoing, but they add to the cautionary weight of the external detections. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match exists for this name, so there is no reputational or licensing context to weigh either way. Evidence: - Homepage: no operating company, licence number, regulator or physical address is stated anywhere on the captured page. - Registration record: registrant details are incomplete and ownership is not attributable from the public record. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - Transport security: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-07 with about 41 days remaining. This is encryption of the connection and says nothing about the operator's legitimacy. ### What to Verify Next Anyone considering any engagement should ask the operator to name the legal entity behind the site. They should then check that entity and any claimed financial authorisation directly in the relevant national regulator or company registry, using an independent route and not the site's own claims. Official contact channels should be confirmed offline or through a source that does not link back to this domain. The domain's reputation status should be re-checked at a later date, since a compromised or newly flagged site may be cleaned or reclassified. Any claim that the site is affiliated with a known brand should be tested against that brand's own official channels. Evidence: - Homepage: no named entity, licence or contact route is available to check against a registry. - Domain registration: the recent creation date means there is no long operating history to corroborate any claims. - External reputation: current threat listings should be re-queried before any decision is made. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high-risk. Current external threat detections, a very recently created domain and an absence of verifiable operator identity outweigh the clean technical behaviour and valid encryption. Legitimacy is not supported by the available evidence, and the site should be treated as unsafe for sensitive interaction. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind a mainstream CDN and WAF operated by a large US provider, and only edge addresses were visible, with no origin server observable. This is a mitigating factor for hosting stability and basic bot protection, and the infrastructure itself shows no abuse reports. It cannot offset the reputation risk. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of where the content is really hosted and can mask rapid content changes. ### Closing Assessment Limit any contact to passive viewing. Do not enter credentials, connect wallets, make payments or share personal or financial data until the operator's identity and the external threat listings have been independently resolved. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`) - Many of the responses the page received looked generated rather than served normally. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_SYNTHETIC_RESPONSES_HIGH`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered between three and six months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_YOUNG_6M`) ### 04 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of noxa.finance. - The request stayed on noxa.finance. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-07-11. (Noted) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3037::ac43:cef0 | | Name servers | kurt.ns.cloudflare.com, georgia.ns.cloudflare.com | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-07 | | Domain age | 0.29 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-07-11 | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | 0 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about noxa.finance at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [aerocdrome.finance](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aerocdrome.finance), another .finance site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [trendle.finance](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trendle.finance), another .finance site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [bankdefi.finance](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bankdefi.finance), another .finance site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [resumption-neutrl.finance](https://trustsniffer.com/report/resumption-neutrl.finance), another .finance site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [vote-neutrl.finance](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-neutrl.finance), another .finance site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [taalswap.finance](https://trustsniffer.com/report/taalswap.finance), another .finance site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [pancakesswaps.finance](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pancakesswaps.finance), another .finance site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [appeal-tmx.finance](https://trustsniffer.com/report/appeal-tmx.finance), another .finance site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [zerionconnect.web.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/zerionconnect.web.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [catlyzoon.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/catlyzoon.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 10/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/noxa.finance) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/noxa.finance · assessed 2026-10-27.*