---
title: "Is okx-vote512.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "okx-vote512.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is okx-vote512.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/okx-vote512.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is okx-vote512.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** okx-vote512.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 13 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the okx-vote512.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/okx-vote512.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What okx-vote512.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a single-page deployment on a free, shared static-hosting subdomain. Its name pairs a well-known crypto-exchange brand with the word "vote" and a numeric suffix. When visited, it did not present ordinary site content. It returned a security interstitial titled "suspected phishing", leaving little legitimate business content to assess, so its apparent purpose is a brand-themed voting or campaign landing page of the kind commonly used to lure crypto-exchange users.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Hard contradictions are present. The site is **blacklisted** by multiple independent reputation sources, with a substantial number of security engines rating it malicious. These include two top-tier vendors, and the volume of detections alone triggers an automatic critical-risk override. The homepage was also replaced by a hosting-platform warning page labelled as suspected phishing, which is corroborating evidence from the infrastructure operator. The hostname borrows a major exchange brand and appends "vote" and a numeric token. This is a typical pattern for brand-themed lures that aim to move users toward wallet connections, credential entry, or fake reward and governance claims. The analysis did not confirm a specific impersonated landing page, because no readable page content was captured, but the naming pattern and the threat listings reinforce each other. In the sandbox, the site's network activity was almost entirely directed to external destinations, with heavy third-party background requests and posts, repeated script errors, and large post-load page rewrites. This is consistent with loader-style pages that assemble content dynamically. No wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijacking, hidden-form, or external credential-form behavior was observed. No conflicting legal identities exist, because no legal pages were available to compare. Evidence:

- Homepage: served a security interstitial titled "Suspected Phishing" instead of site content, with the capture challenged and blocked (HTTP 403).
- Reputation sources: 13 engines rated the domain malicious and 2 suspicious, including two tier-1 vendors. This activated the critical-risk override.
- Sandbox behavior: 87 external XHR/fetch requests and 5 external POSTs (up to 96.9% of requests directed to external destinations), 16 console errors, and a maximum of 1,508 DOM mutations after interaction.
- Hostname: a free shared-hosting subdomain combining an exchange brand name, "vote", and a numeric suffix.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No legal, licensing, or corporate-registration pages were accessible, so no regulatory status can be assessed, and no regulator or broker-reputation record matched this domain. The absence of verifiable regulatory standing is not the basis of the cautionary rating. The rating rests on the confirmed threat detections above. A domain on a free shared-hosting platform has no independent corporate identity of its own. Nothing observed links it to the official operator of the exchange brand its name evokes. The valid encryption certificate is a baseline hygiene factor only. Free, automated, domain-validated certificates are available to any site, including malicious ones, so it carries no weight as evidence of legitimacy. Evidence:

- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US) on a shared free-hosting subdomain.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YE1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-13.
- Brand-reputation dataset: no match found for the site, so no third-party broker context exists.

### What to Verify Next

Any claim of affiliation with the exchange brand should be checked only through that brand's official domain, typed manually or reached through a previously saved bookmark, never through a link that led to this site. Any "vote", reward, airdrop, or governance announcement that referred a user here should be confirmed through the brand's official announcement channels. Anyone who has already opened the site and connected a wallet, signed a message, or entered credentials should review and revoke wallet token approvals and change the affected passwords. The official support channel should be confirmed through an independent route. Evidence:

- Homepage: the only observed artifact is the phishing-warning interstitial, so no on-site claim can be treated as authoritative.
- Hostname: the brand-plus-"vote" pattern is the only available indication of the claimed affiliation.
- Reputation sources: the current external detections should be rechecked before any future interaction, in case the status changes.

### Summary Verdict

The available evidence places this site firmly in the high-risk category. Independent threat detections, a platform-issued phishing warning, and a brand-evoking hostname on disposable hosting converge, and nothing in the evidence offsets them. The site should be treated as hostile until the detections are cleared by the listing sources.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind the Cloudflare CDN/WAF, and all observed addresses are edge servers, so the origin host could not be independently identified. Bot-protection challenges were active and caused the page capture to be blocked. The valid certificate and the reputable provider are mitigating factors only. They cannot offset the reputation risk, and the same shared infrastructure can host benign and malicious content alike.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for login, wallet connection, signing, credential entry, or any financial interaction. Passive viewing carries lower risk but is still discouraged. Users should leave the page and report the link to the hosting platform and to the impersonated brand's security team if it arrived through a message or advertisement.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of okx-vote512.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on okx-vote512.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2cd1 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-13 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 13 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about okx-vote512.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [vote-mefai.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-mefai.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 23/100)
- [virtuals-votings.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/virtuals-votings.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [cryptifyaiconfig.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cryptifyaiconfig.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [claim-bitcoin-hyper.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-bitcoin-hyper.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [blockdagtoken.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockdagtoken.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [telcoins-bank-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/telcoins-bank-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [yeifi-votings.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/yeifi-votings.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 20/100)
- [mindnetwork-xyz.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mindnetwork-xyz.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [roblnhoods.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/roblnhoods.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-6dy.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-6dy.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/okx-vote512.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/okx-vote512.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-22.*