--- title: "Is original-blokyz.web.app a Scam? Trust Score 12/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "original-blokyz.web.app" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is original-blokyz.web.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 12/100" trust_score: 12 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/original-blokyz.web.app assessed: 2026-10-22 --- # Is original-blokyz.web.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 12/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 12/100.** original-blokyz.web.app shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 3% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 1 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (3 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR4) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the original-blokyz.web.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/original-blokyz.web.app/screenshots/first.png) _What original-blokyz.web.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview The website titled "Original Blokyz" is a single-page property on a platform-provided web-app subdomain. It shows visitors only a very short block of text, with no identifiable product, service, pricing, or operator description, so its business model and purpose cannot be determined from what it presents. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present, and they drive a clearly cautionary posture. The domain is on a **confirmed blacklist**: several independent threat-intelligence engines currently flag it as malicious or suspicious, and an external blacklist corroborates this. The domain is also very young, with only a thin archive trail, so no meaningful track record offsets these detections. Four abuse reports also exist against a shared provider address that serves the site. They are weak on their own because that address is shared with other tenants, but they add to the picture and are not discounted. Behavioural testing found no wallet-drainer activity, clipboard hijacking, hidden forms, external password submission, or cloaking, so no specific exploit mechanism was observed. The share of outbound requests to third-party hosts was high, though, and every external request went to a recognised destination. No conflicting legal entities and no brand-impersonation evidence were found. The risk comes from the reputation detections combined with the lack of any established history. Evidence: - Homepage and reputation sources: two engines rate the domain malicious and one suspicious, and an external blacklist also lists it. - Domain provenance: registered about 43 days ago (~0.12 years old), with only 3 archive snapshots from 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-22 (1 year tracked). - Homepage behaviour: 9 external XHR/POST calls were observed, up to 85.7% of requests going to external hosts at peak, with 0 non-whitelisted destinations and 3 console errors across 3 successful runs. - Shared provider address: 4 abuse reports, last filed about 8 days before analysis, attributed to shared infrastructure and not discounted. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured homepage carries only a few hundred characters of text. It names no legal entity, registration number, licence, regulator, terms of service, or privacy policy, so there is nothing on the site to test against an official registry. This is a content gap on the site itself and does not prove wrongdoing, but together with the threat detections it leaves no counterweight. The site's claim to be "original" is unsupported, and the real-world operator has not been independently connected to any recognisable brand or person. No third-party broker or regulator record corroborates the site as a regulated service. Evidence: - Homepage: about 365 characters of text, with no company name, licence, or regulator reference. - Site structure: no legal, terms, privacy, or about pages were observed in the capture. - Transport encryption: the TLS certificate was issued by WR4 at domain-validation (DV) level only, valid to 2026-12-22 (61 days remaining), which confirms encryption but not operator identity. - Hosting: served from AS54113 (Fastly, Inc., US). ### What to Verify Next Any dealings should start with whether the operator is a real, identifiable entity. First, ask the party that directed you to this site to confirm the address through an independent channel, such as a known official website or an offline contact. Second, if the site claims a brand, product, or licensed status, check that claim directly with the brand's official channels or the relevant registry. Third, check again after the reputation detections have been reviewed or cleared, since a flagged young domain can change quickly. Fourth, confirm any official support or contact channel through an independent route. Evidence: - Homepage: it gives no operator name or product detail to check against an external source. - Domain provenance: the domain's brief existence means no historical record can vouch for it. - Reputation sources: the current detections are active and unresolved at the time of analysis. ### Summary Verdict The site's overall trust posture is critical. Active third-party threat detections on a newly created domain with no verifiable operator identity outweigh its technically sound transport security and clean behavioural profile. Those technical positives show that the site is operational, not that it is legitimate. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is fronted by Fastly, a mainstream content-delivery and edge-protection provider. All observed addresses are edge nodes and the origin server was not observable. The provider's reputation and a valid certificate are mitigating factors only. They cannot offset the threat detections, and edge-only visibility prevents independent confirmation of where the content is actually hosted or how quickly it could be swapped. ### Closing Assessment Credentials, logins, payments, and downloads should be avoided entirely. At most, the page should be viewed read-only, and any link or prompt that led there should be treated as untrusted and reported to the organisation it claimed to come from. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 03 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 04 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY`) ### 05 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2620:0:890::100 (Google LLC, Content Delivery Network), 3% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of original-blokyz.web.app. - The request stayed on original-blokyz.web.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-08. (Clear) - It is hosted on FASTLY, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | FASTLY - Fastly, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2620:0:890::100 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (fastly) | | Resolved IP addresses | 2 | | Edge IP addresses | 2 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WR4 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-22 | | Domain age | 0.12 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-09-08 | | Archive snapshots | 3 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 3% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about original-blokyz.web.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [robinhood-main-dex-uvm.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-uvm.netlify.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [flamengotoken.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flamengotoken.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [programmable-v4.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/programmable-v4.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-zhq.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-zhq.netlify.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 2/100) - [crypto-s8t.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-s8t.netlify.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [upgraded-eth.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/upgraded-eth.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [robinhood-main-dex-psg.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-psg.netlify.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [pump-voting-wqg.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-voting-wqg.netlify.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [livetrustwalletsnycs.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/livetrustwalletsnycs.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [hyperliqd-1288.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hyperliqd-1288.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23) - [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/original-blokyz.web.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/original-blokyz.web.app · assessed 2026-10-22.*