---
title: "Is p1inch.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "p1inch.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is p1inch.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/p1inch.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-26
---

# Is p1inch.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** p1inch.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 4 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the p1inch.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/p1inch.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What p1inch.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a page hosted on a free shared-hosting subdomain of a developer deployment platform. When automated analysis tried to load its homepage, the visitor received a security interstitial headed "Suspected Phishing" instead of site content, and the server returned an access-denied response. The site's actual products, branding and business model therefore could not be observed. Its apparent purpose cannot be established from its own content, and the available evidence points to a page that has been flagged as a likely phishing or abuse vector.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and are the dominant factor in this assessment. Several independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag the domain as malicious, including at least one major security vendor. This amounts to a **confirmed blacklist-grade detection**, and its weight is consistent with the platform-level phishing warning served in place of the page. The bot-challenge response also means the homepage content was never available for inspection. Any login, wallet, or payment flow the page might present is therefore unreviewed, and the site cannot be cleared by inspection. Dynamic testing found no wallet-drainer behaviour, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden forms and no credential posts to external hosts. These are neutral observations and do not offset the external detections. The page did generate heavy outbound request activity, a very large burst of DOM changes after interaction, and repeated script errors. This pattern is consistent with a dynamically assembled front end that could swap its content quickly. No conflicting legal identities or brand claims could be examined, so no identity contradiction is asserted; the risk rests on the detections and the interstitial warning.


Evidence:
- Homepage capture returned an access-denied response with a page titled "Suspected Phishing", so no site content was reviewable.
- Threat-intelligence aggregation recorded 4 malicious and 2 suspicious verdicts for the domain, including a flag from a tier-one vendor.
- Behavioural testing across 3 successful runs recorded 53 external XHR/fetch calls and 4 external POST requests, all to destinations on the allow-list.
- Interaction produced 1,508 DOM mutations and 15 console errors on the homepage.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No licensing, registration, legal-entity or terms information could be reviewed, because the legal and identity pages were not reachable behind the interstitial. The operator could not be connected to any real-world person or organisation, and registration details show ownership opacity. This is an administrative limitation, not a contradiction in itself. No third-party broker or regulator listing matched the domain, so no external reputational signal on licensing exists either way. The site cannot be treated as regulated or supervised on this evidence. The weight of the assessment comes from the threat detections above, not from any disclosure gap.


Evidence:
- Served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- TLS certificate issued by WE1, domain-validated (DV) only, valid to 2027-01-11. A DV certificate confirms control of the domain and says nothing about the operator.
- No legal, terms, or about content was retrievable, so no company name, licence number or registrar-level disclosure is available.

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, confirm through an independent route who is supposed to operate this address, such as a published channel on an official, separately known website of the claimed organisation. The address should be treated as unconfirmed until that organisation itself confirms it. Pending that confirmation, the live page should not be opened in an environment holding wallets, saved credentials or corporate sessions. If the page is to be examined, it should be loaded only in an isolated, disposable browser. The domain's current listing status with the hosting platform's abuse team and with major browser safe-browsing services should be re-checked before any reassessment.


Evidence:
- The hosting platform's own interstitial labelled the page as suspected phishing, which is the primary reason to confirm legitimacy out of band.
- The domain is a subdomain of a shared hosting platform, so ownership cannot be inferred from the registrable domain.
- The page content has not been reviewed, so any claimed identity, product or contact detail on it remains untested.

### Summary Verdict

The site presents an elevated-risk, clearly cautionary posture. Active external detections and a platform-level phishing warning outweigh the benign technical hygiene observed. No operator identity has been connected to the domain, and the page itself has not been reviewed. The assessment therefore reads as high risk for any sensitive interaction and does not establish any legitimate purpose.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind a mainstream CDN and WAF, with bot-protection challenge responses and a valid TLS certificate, and all observed addresses are edge nodes. The origin server was not observable. This is a mitigating factor for transport integrity only. It does not offset the external detections, and it prevents independent hosting verification of the content actually being served.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for account login, credential entry, wallet connection or any financial interaction, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Any link that leads here should be treated as untrusted and reported to the sender's organisation or the hosting platform's abuse channel.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of p1inch.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on p1inch.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f5d |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-11 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 4 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about p1inch.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [orai-ae.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/orai-ae.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [tronscanerc.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tronscanerc.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [blockdagpresales.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockdagpresales.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [rewards-paal-ai-io.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rewards-paal-ai-io.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [dogeversestaking.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dogeversestaking.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [champions-early-access.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/champions-early-access.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [hibachiclaim.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hibachiclaim.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 17/100)
- [midenclaim.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/midenclaim.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [flocmaterials.shop](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flocmaterials.shop), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [summitcapitalpatners.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/summitcapitalpatners.info), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 14/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/p1inch.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/p1inch.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-26.*