--- title: "Is packscan.org a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "packscan.org" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is packscan.org a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/packscan.org assessed: 2026-10-20 --- # Is packscan.org a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** packscan.org shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | PackScan markets an AI crypto portfolio scanner for Solana and EVM wallets. It offers token risk verdicts, AI price targets (up to 7.7x), and missed-profit reports. The page pairs these claims with an X/Backpack 'verified' redirect and a wallet modal that asks to 'approve to scan any amount', while giving no legal entity, address, or verifiable audit evidence. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | None flagged it (VirusTotal) | Clear | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 2% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 6 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 22 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (3 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YR1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the packscan.org homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/packscan.org/screenshots/first.png) _What packscan.org served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - VirusTotal and Google Safe Browsing had no flags for this domain; its hosting IP carries AbuseIPDB reports below the confidence level TrustSniffer treats as a flag. ## Full analysis ### Overview PackScan is a single-page marketing site for an "AI Crypto Portfolio Tracker" aimed at holders of Solana and EVM-chain tokens, including memecoins. It invites visitors to connect a wallet for five free AI scans that return token risk verdicts, price targets and "missed profit" reports. The apparent business model is a freemium funnel: free scans first, then unspecified paid scans or features. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk No contradictory identity signals were observed. There is no confirmed phishing or threat-feed listing, no brand-impersonation finding, and no conflicting legal entities. The concern is the homepage's behavior and the site's age. The domain is only about three weeks old and shows almost no history. Its claims are not backed by any verifiable evidence. The homepage opens with a staged "Verified by X" sequence. It reads "Official website," "No threats detected," and "Your X account has been verified and linked to BackPack," then redirects. It displays a Backpack account with a follower count, but nothing shows that Backpack or X endorses it. This is an **unverified endorsement badge**. It borrows the credibility of a known wallet brand without proof of affiliation. The page also says "No wallet signature required" and "No funds access." Yet the wallet modal asks the visitor to "approve to scan any amount." That wording suggests a token-spending permission, not a read-only scan, so the page contradicts itself on a high-stakes action. The headline claims cannot be checked. These include AI price targets of up to 7.7x, "1000+ tokens tracked," "$2.5B+ portfolio value," "250K+ wallets analyzed," and a "What Users Say" block of unattributed testimonials. The site names memecoin tickers such as TROLL, PIPPIN, ALCH, VANK, WOLF and CHILL alongside multiplier-style profit promises. This pattern is typical of engagement and wallet-connection funnels, not of audited analytics. No single signal here is proof of fraud. Together they show a claim-to-evidence gap on an interaction that touches user funds. Evidence: - Homepage: staged "Verified by X" and "Official website" redirect flow tied to a Backpack account, with no verifiable proof of affiliation. - Homepage: the wallet modal's "approve to scan any amount" wording sits beside "No wallet signature required" and "No funds access." - Homepage: unattributed usage counters, testimonials and "up to 7.7x" price targets, with no audit or methodology evidence. - Domain registered 2026-09-28 (~0.06 years old, about three weeks) through Namecheap. Only 3 archive snapshots, dated 2026-09-29 to 2026-10-12, within a single tracked year. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The homepage names no legal entity, registered address, licensing authority or registration number. It states no regulatory status, even though it markets token verdicts and price targets that visitors may act on financially. These are verification gaps, not evidence of wrongdoing on their own. The pricing link shows no prices, so the cost of the paid tier after the five free scans is also unstated. No third-party broker or regulator record corresponds to the site, so no outside reputational context supports or contradicts its claims. The hosting and encryption facts are neutral. They confirm the site is reachable and encrypted. They do not identify who operates it. Evidence: - Homepage: no company name, address, licence or registration number, and no terms-based identity disclosure was observed. - Homepage: a pricing link is present but shows no prices for the post-trial tier. - Served from AS174 (Cogent Communications), with the hosting provider labelled LN01 and a secondary ASN of 394745, in Canada. - TLS certificate issued by YR1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-31; domain-validated only, so it confirms no organizational identity. ### What to Verify Next The operator's identity should be established first. Any claimed entity can then be checked against the relevant company or financial registry. The Backpack and X relationship should be confirmed only through Backpack's own official channels. The homepage's redirect and badge cannot serve as that confirmation. Before any connection, the wallet prompt should be read in full to see whether it requests read-only access or a token-spending approval. Any wallet used for testing should be a throwaway holding no meaningful assets. The usage counters, testimonials and price-target methodology should be checked for independent substantiation. Paid-tier pricing and terms should be obtained in writing. Support and contact channels should be confirmed through an independent route. Evidence: - Homepage: the wallet modal's approval wording is the key item to test before any connection. - Homepage: the Backpack and X verification sequence has no independent corroboration to check against. - Homepage: stat counters and testimonials need external substantiation. - Homepage: pricing is not published. ### Summary Verdict The available evidence supports an elevated-risk assessment. A very new domain, unverified endorsement claims, a self-contradicting wallet-permission flow and unsupported performance promises converge into a clearly cautionary posture. Page substance, not infrastructure or encryption, drives this conclusion. The operator's real-world identity is unverified. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site resolves to a single IP address. No CDN or WAF was detected, so no protective layer shields the server and none offsets the other concerns. The address sits on a shared hosting provider's network in Canada. Six abuse reports have been filed against that IP, the most recent only days before the analysis. Because the IP is shared, these reports are a soft reputational signal about the provider's range, not about this site. A single security engine also flagged the domain as suspicious without confirmation. Neither signal establishes a threat listing. Young-domain and sparse-subdomain patterns add mild infrastructure caution, consistent with a recently launched site. ### Closing Assessment Wallet connection and any approval prompt should wait until the operator is identified and the Backpack and X claims are independently confirmed. Until then, the site is suitable only for viewing the landing page. Assets of consequence should stay out of any wallet used for testing. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by page content, history in the web archive. ### 01 Page content - A form on the page submits to a destination TrustSniffer could not verify. (Page content `rule:PAGE_FORM_UNTRUSTED_DEST`) - The review of the page content rated it high risk. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RISK_HIGH`) - The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW`) - The page content shows three or more warning signs that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_STRONG`) ### 02 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 6 reports on hosting IP 170.75.160.175 (Lunanode Hosting Inc., Fixed Line ISP), 2% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 25% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of packscan.org. - The request stayed on packscan.org. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under NAMECHEAP INC. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by registrar-servers.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-09-28. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-29. (Clear) - It is hosted on COGENT-174, from a server in CA. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | NAMECHEAP INC | | Hosting | COGENT-174 - Cogent Communications, LLC, US | | Country | CA | | Server IP | 170.75.160.175 | | Name servers | dns1.registrar-servers.com, dns2.registrar-servers.com | | CDN / edge network | Not detected | | Resolved IP addresses | 1 | | Edge IP addresses | 0 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 1 | | SSL issuer | YR1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-31 | | Domain age | 0.06 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-09-28 | | Archive first seen | 2026-09-29 | | Archive snapshots | 3 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 0 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 2% confidence, 6 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about packscan.org at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [packscan.cc](https://trustsniffer.com/report/packscan.cc), same name on .cc (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [packscan.co](https://trustsniffer.com/report/packscan.co), same name on .co (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [exitpain.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/exitpain.org), also hosted by COGENT-174 (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [claimed.cash](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claimed.cash), also hosted by COGENT-174 (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [scanana.cc](https://trustsniffer.com/report/scanana.cc), also hosted by COGENT-174 (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [solotx.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solotx.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [xrpaynet.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xrpaynet.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [atfsolutions.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/atfsolutions.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [07ying5.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/07ying5.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [07a32.cc](https://trustsniffer.com/report/07a32.cc), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer) - [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/packscan.org) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/packscan.org · assessed 2026-10-20.*