--- title: "Is pool2.fun a Scam? Trust Score 24/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "pool2.fun" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is pool2.fun a Scam? Risk Report, Score 24/100" trust_score: 24 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/pool2.fun assessed: 2026-10-21 --- # Is pool2.fun a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 24/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 24/100.** pool2.fun shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | This is the GitHub Pages 404 'Site not found' placeholder, indicating that no site is published at the requested address. It contains no product, service, forms, or claims. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 42% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 39 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 11 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Watch | | Web archive | Archived since 2025 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YR2) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the pool2.fun homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/pool2.fun/screenshots/first.png) _What pool2.fun served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2025. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### The website is an unpopulated placeholder a stock "Site not found" 404 page from a code-hosting service's static-page product, stating that no site is published at this address. It presents no products, services, forms, navigation, contact details, or business claims, so its purpose and business model cannot be determined from what it shows a visitor. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk The assessment is cautionary, because a **confirmed external blacklist hit** is the decisive contradiction. One reputation engine rates the domain malicious and a second rates it suspicious. No brand impersonation, conflicting legal identities, or phishing form was observed, and the page contains no login field, wallet prompt, or payment capture. The risk therefore rests on reputation and on the domain's recent, unestablished standing, not on visible deceptive content. Abuse reports exist against the shared hosting address the domain resolves to. These are attributed to infrastructure shared with other tenants and are not discounted, so they weigh on the domain's reputation. They do not, on their own, show that this domain's operator authored the abuse. The page content also offers nothing that could clear or explain the blacklist hit. Because the address serves an empty placeholder, whoever later publishes content under this domain would inherit a domain that is already flagged, with no on-site history to judge it against. The sandbox run added soft anomalies. Nearly all outbound traffic went to external destinations, three outbound POST requests went to non-whitelisted hosts, the final destination did not match expectations, and the page logged repeated console errors despite its minimal content. These support a cautious reading but are not proof of malicious intent. Evidence: - Homepage: a stock hosting-provider 404 page ("There isn't a GitHub Pages site here") with no commercial claims, forms, or links. - External reputation: one engine flags the domain malicious and one flags it suspicious, and the blacklist is corroborated across reputation sources. 39 abuse reports (confidence 42%) were logged against a shared GitHub, Inc. hosting address. - Domain provenance: WHOIS creation date 2026-09-10 (~0.11 years old, 41 days); the web archive holds 1 snapshot, dated 2025-12-05 (1 year tracked). - Behavioral sandbox: 3 runs, 15 console errors, 6 outbound POSTs of which 3 were to non-whitelisted hosts, and a flagged destination mismatch. ### Regulatory Verification Notes There are no legal, terms, privacy, about, or contact pages, and the site names no operating entity, so nothing on the site can be tied to a real-world person or company. No licensing or registration claim is made. Because no claim exists, there is nothing to confirm or contradict, and this is a verification gap, not evidence of wrongdoing. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match was found, so no external reputational signal on regulatory standing exists either way. Registration privacy is an administrative matter and does not count against the site. What does weigh here is the combination of a very recently registered domain, an unconfirmed operator, and an active reputation flag, none of which the site's own content offsets. Evidence: - Site content: no entity name, address, license number, or regulator reference on the only reachable page. - Registration: registered through Namecheap with a privacy service shielding registrant details; expiry 2027-09-10. - Transport and hosting: served from AS54113 (Fastly, Inc., US); the TLS certificate is DV-level, issued by YR2 and valid to 2026-12-25, which confirms an encrypted channel but not operator identity. ### What to Verify Next Any party presenting this domain as the home of a service should be asked to prove control of it through an independent, offline route, such as a published statement from a known corporate website or a direct call to a number sourced elsewhere. If a real site is later published, its legal entity, licensing claims, and terms pages should be checked against the relevant public registry before any engagement. The blacklist entries should be re-checked directly with the flagging reputation sources, as listings can change or be delisted after remediation. Official support and contact channels should also be confirmed independently before relying on them. Evidence: - Homepage: no operator, license, or contact information is published to check against. - External reputation: the current malicious and suspicious ratings are the specific listings to re-check. - Registration data: the domain's recent creation date means any long-standing relationship claimed for it cannot be supported by its history. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high-caution. A confirmed blacklist hit, a very young domain, and an operator who cannot be connected to any real-world identity outweigh the technically valid encryption and the absence of overtly deceptive page content. The available evidence supports neither a reading of legitimacy nor a finding of active fraud. It supports only the conclusion that the domain carries elevated, unresolved risk. ### Infrastructure Integrity The domain resolves to four edge addresses of the Fastly content-delivery network, and no origin server is observable. Edge-only visibility prevents independent confirmation of what actually stands behind the domain and could allow content to change quickly without any visible signal. The provider and certificate are mainstream, which is a mitigating factor. That protection cannot offset the reputation risk, and shared-tenant addressing means infrastructure quality says little about this particular domain. Unconfirmed heuristics flag fragmented addressing and sparse subdomains on a young domain, and these are consistent with the verdict but are not independently confirmed risks. ### Closing Assessment Use should be limited to read-only viewing. Account login, credential entry, wallet connection, payments, and any download should be avoided, and any message or advertisement directing users to this domain should be treated as unverified until the operator is independently confirmed. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 6 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, history in the web archive, page content, hosting and network, registration and ownership, behaviour in a sandbox. ### 01 External reputation - A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`) ### 02 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 03 Page content - The page has very little readable content. (Page content `rule:PAGE_CONTENT_THIN`) ### 04 Hosting and network - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN`) ### 05 Registration and ownership - The registration record withholds contact details for the operator. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN`) ### 06 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 39 reports on hosting IP 185.199.110.153 (GitHub, Inc., Content Delivery Network), 42% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 25% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of pool2.fun. - The request stayed on pool2.fun. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under NAMECHEAP INC. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by registrar-servers.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-09-10. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2025-12-05. (Clear) - It is hosted on FASTLY, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | NAMECHEAP INC | | Hosting | FASTLY - Fastly, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 185.199.110.153 | | Name servers | dns1.registrar-servers.com, dns2.registrar-servers.com | | CDN / edge network | Detected (fastly) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | YR2 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-25 | | Domain age | 0.88 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-09-10 | | Archive first seen | 2025-12-05 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 42% confidence, 39 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about pool2.fun at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [pump-streamfor.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-streamfor.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 16/100) - [pump-coin-live.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-coin-live.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [bitvavo.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bitvavo.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [pumpclick.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pumpclick.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [pump-strem.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-strem.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [foxmeta.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/foxmeta.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [dev-drop.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dev-drop.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [groksol.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/groksol.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [fiush.cc](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fiush.cc), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [getblockaml.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/getblockaml.vercel.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24) - [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer) - [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pool2.fun) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/pool2.fun · assessed 2026-10-21.*