---
title: "Is portal-aerodrome.co a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "portal-aerodrome.co"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is portal-aerodrome.co a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-aerodrome.co
assessed: 2026-10-26
---

# Is portal-aerodrome.co a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** portal-aerodrome.co shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 9 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Never archived (No public history of this site) | Watch |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the portal-aerodrome.co homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-aerodrome.co/screenshots/first.png)

_What portal-aerodrome.co served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website, portal-aerodrome.co, is a very recently registered site whose content could not be retrieved in full. Automated access met a protective challenge, and the page that came back was a short "suspected phishing" warning interstitial rather than a business homepage. The name suggests a portal-style access point for an "aerodrome" service. No products, company name, services or business model could be observed, so its purpose cannot be established from the site itself.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The risk here is **elevated and driven by confirmed external reputation findings**. Several independent security vendors currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and two of them are tier-one security vendors. This amounts to a confirmed blacklisting, and it is the decisive factor in the assessment. The only page captured was a suspected-phishing warning interstitial returned with an access-denied response, which fits the external detections. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were observed, but the site presented no content that could rebut the detections. Behavioral testing found no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms or externally submitted password forms. It did find heavy outbound traffic: most requests during interaction went to third-party destinations, with dozens of external background calls and several external POST submissions. Page scripts also produced a high number of console errors. The destinations were not flagged as unrecognized, but the pattern is consistent with a thin or placeholder front end. The domain is also only weeks old, which is the profile typically seen in short-lived abuse infrastructure. Evidence:

- Homepage capture: the page returned was a suspected-phishing warning interstitial with an access-denied status and under 400 characters of text.
- External reputation: nine malicious and two suspicious verdicts from security vendors, including two tier-one vendors.
- Domain provenance: registered 2026-08-19 (~0.18 years, about 67 days old).
- Behavioral sandbox: 32 external XHR calls and 8 external POSTs across three runs, 26 console errors, and no wallet, clipboard or hidden-form activity.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured content contained no legal, terms, privacy or about pages, and no licence, registration number or named operating company. The site's regulatory status therefore cannot be assessed from its own content, and a missing licence is a verification gap here, not evidence of wrongdoing in itself. Registration was made through Dynadot Inc, and the registrant's identity is withheld or incomplete. That is an ownership-opacity limitation, not an identity contradiction. No third-party broker or regulator record matched the domain. The adverse security detections are the issue, and they carry far more weight than any administrative gap. The site's transport encryption is valid but only domain-validated, so it confirms an encrypted connection and says nothing about who operates the site. Evidence:

- Registration: Dynadot Inc, created 2026-08-19, expiring 2027-08-19, with owner details withheld or incomplete.
- Transport security: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2027-01-15.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Captured content: no legal entity name, licence or registration disclosure was visible in the only page retrieved.

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, the operator should first be asked why the domain is flagged. A legitimate owner, or a victim of compromise, would need to demonstrate remediation. The business behind the site should be identified through independent channels, such as a company registry search and a regulator's licence register for any claimed authorisation. Official contact channels should be confirmed through an independent, offline route and never through links on this domain. Any claim that this domain belongs to an established aviation, travel or financial brand should be checked against that brand's own published web addresses. The domain should be re-assessed after the vendor flags are cleared and a full, retrievable site is live. Evidence:

- Homepage: no named operator or contact details were retrievable to anchor an independent check.
- External reputation: the active vendor detections must be cleared or explained before the domain can be considered for any interaction.
- Domain provenance: the registration is weeks old, so there is no long operating record to rely on.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high-risk. Confirmed adverse findings from multiple security vendors, a very young domain and the absence of observable site content leave nothing that supports legitimacy. The valid encryption and absence of wallet-drainer or credential-exfiltration behavior in testing do not offset the reputation findings. The classification is clearly cautionary and security-forward.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and web application firewall. All observed addresses are edge servers, and the origin server could not be observed, so hosting cannot be independently verified. The bot-protection layer explains why content capture was blocked. This protection is a mitigating factor only. It does not offset the adverse reputation findings, and a young domain with sparse subdomains is an unconfirmed heuristic concern, not an established one.


### Closing Assessment

Interaction should be limited to read-only viewing, if it is needed at all. Logging in, entering credentials, making payments and any other financial activity should be avoided until the external detections are resolved and the operator is independently identified.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)
- The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-aerodrome.co.

- The request stayed on portal-aerodrome.co. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under Dynadot Inc. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-08-19. (Noted)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Dynadot Inc |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3034::6815:3484 |
| Name servers | CORALINE.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, DARWIN.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-15 |
| Domain age | 0.18 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-08-19 |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | 0 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 9 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-aerodrome.co at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [cashcats.co](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cashcats.co), another .co site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 10/100)
- [shibinhood.co](https://trustsniffer.com/report/shibinhood.co), another .co site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [pciymarket.co](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pciymarket.co), another .co site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [bagsfumbled.co](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bagsfumbled.co), another .co site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 12/100)
- [hylrukrxwfwbooknmtyx.supabase.co](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hylrukrxwfwbooknmtyx.supabase.co), another .co site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [mediafires.co](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mediafires.co), another .co site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [herofx.co](https://trustsniffer.com/report/herofx.co), another .co site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [onbroker.co](https://trustsniffer.com/report/onbroker.co), another .co site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [313456.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/313456.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [3115kk.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/3115kk.top), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-aerodrome.co) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-aerodrome.co · assessed 2026-10-26.*