---
title: "Is portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app a Scam? Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-21
---

# Is portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | Netlify-hosted 'Site not found' 404 error page. It has no business content, forms, links or product information, so the site's purpose cannot be determined. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a subdomain on a shared static-hosting platform that currently serves only the platform's generic "Site not found" error page. The page carries no business content, products, navigation, contact details or links, apart from the host's own invitation to "Start building". It presents no visible purpose, and no business model or monetization can be observed. Its name, which combines "portal" and "moonshot", suggests an intended login or investment-style front end rather than a finished service.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

This assessment is cautionary. Multiple independent reputation engines flag the site as malicious, and a tier-one security vendor is among them. The site is therefore treated as **blacklisted**. The visible page is benign, but automated behavioral testing contradicts it. In every test run, hidden forms were present, and password-entry fields were detected, on a page that visibly offers no form at all. After interaction, the page's structure also changed heavily. That pattern is consistent with a dormant or placeholder deployment that can be populated with a credential-collection interface without notice. The subdomain also closely imitates the hosting platform's own name, which raises the possibility of platform-brand impersonation. No outbound requests to unrecognized destinations and no cloaking were observed, which limits the confirmed behavioral risk but does not offset the external detections. Abuse reports exist for one of the shared edge addresses, but they relate to infrastructure used by many tenants. They are a weak, non-decisive signal about this site and are not weighed as evidence of its operator's conduct. No conflicting legal identities were observed, but none could be established either.


Evidence:
- Homepage: shows only the platform's "Site not found" notice and a generic "Start building" prompt, with no products, claims or contact information.
- Behavioral testing of the homepage: hidden forms and password-type fields were detected in all three runs, although no form is visible, and the page structure changed heavily after interaction.
- External reputation: three engines rated the site malicious and one suspicious, with a tier-one vendor among them.
- Shared hosting address: four abuse reports were recorded against an edge address on a content-delivery network, attributed to shared provider infrastructure.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site makes no licensing or registration claim, and it has no legal, terms, privacy or about pages that could identify an operating entity. The operator is therefore unidentified, which is a case of ownership opacity and not an identity contradiction. Real-world identity could not be independently connected to any brand or person. Nothing on the site can be treated as an assurance of regulated status, and no third-party broker or regulatory-database entry was matched. The valid organization-validated certificate belongs to the hosting platform and does not attest the identity of the party operating this subdomain.


Evidence:
- Homepage: no company name, licence, registration number or jurisdiction is stated, and no legal pages exist.
- Transport encryption: certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV), subject organization Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Broker-reputation dataset: no match found, so there is no third-party broker signal either way.

### What to Verify Next

Before any further interaction, the origin of the link should be established. The party that supplied the address should be asked, through an independently sourced channel such as a known phone number or an official corporate website reached separately, whether this deployment is theirs and what the canonical address is. If the site is claimed to be a financial or investment portal, any licensing claim should be confirmed directly with the relevant registry. Official support and contact channels should be taken from the organization's primary website and not from this subdomain. Any message, advertisement or referral that directed a visitor here should be treated as suspect until that confirmation is received.


Evidence:
- Homepage: no identifying or contact information exists to verify against, so confirmation must come from outside the site.
- Behavioral testing: the hidden password-type fields mean any page later served from this address cannot be assumed to match the current blank state.
- External reputation: current malicious ratings from several engines make independent confirmation of the address a precondition for any engagement.

### Summary Verdict

The deterministic assessment places this site in the highest-risk tier, and the posture is clearly cautionary. Current external threat detections, hidden credential-capture structures that contradict the blank visible page, and an unverified operator identity converge on a high-risk reading. The valid certificate and established hosting platform are mitigating technical facts. They do not establish legitimacy, and they cannot offset the reputational findings.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served entirely through edge addresses on Amazon's network, behind the hosting platform's CDN/WAF layer, and no origin server address could be observed. This protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only. It adds no evidence of legitimacy, and edge-only visibility means the content can be replaced quickly without any visible change to the address or the certificate. The platform's certificate and mainstream hosting provide transport security, not assurance about who operates the subdomain.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as unsafe for any sensitive interaction. No credentials should be entered and no payment, wallet or personal data supplied. Passive viewing is the most that can be justified. Anyone directed here by a third party should report the link to that party and to the hosting platform's abuse channel.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)
- The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION`)

### 03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)
- The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [crypto-os5.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-os5.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-oht.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-oht.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [pump-voting-r1.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-voting-r1.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [vocal-piroshki-bef531.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vocal-piroshki-bef531.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-gqv.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-gqv.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-fmt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-fmt.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-eht.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-eht.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-dlr.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-dlr.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [digital-arcnetwork.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/digital-arcnetwork.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [funstreamer.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/funstreamer.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-21.*