---
title: "Is portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app a Scam? Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Web archive | Never archived (No public history of this site) | Watch |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This is a web property served from a subdomain of a shared static-site hosting platform. Its name suggests a "portal" product. When captured, the homepage returned a "Site not found" page with only a few hundred characters of text. It showed no product, service, company name, or commercial offer, so its purpose and business model cannot be determined from what a visitor sees.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The assessment is clearly cautionary, because the site's external reputation is adverse. It is **blacklisted** by external threat-intelligence sources. Several detection engines classify it as malicious and another rates it suspicious, and a tier-one security vendor is among those flagging it. The sandbox also observed behaviour inconsistent with a blank "not found" page. Concealed form elements, including password-bearing forms, were present in every run. Interaction triggered extensive rewriting of the page structure. Nearly all network activity went to third-party destinations, including a substantial volume of outbound POST requests. The destinations were recognised and whitelisted, and no wallet-connection, wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijacking, cloaking, or fingerprinting behaviour was seen. Even so, a hidden credential-capable form on a page that shows no visible purpose is a recognised pattern for credential collection. Two abuse reports exist, but they attach to a shared cloud-provider address rather than to this site. They are treated as discounted background noise and are not counted against it. No conflicting legal identities and no brand impersonation were observed. The elevated risk rests on the confirmed blacklisting and the hidden-form behaviour.


Evidence:
- Homepage: the captured page returned a "Site not found" error, with a title to match and almost no body text, and displayed no offer or identity.
- Behavioural sandbox, all three runs: hidden forms were detected on every pass, and password forms were present. The page structure changed by roughly 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction.
- Network behaviour: about 99.6% of observed traffic at peak was external, with 15 external XHR/fetch calls and 21 external POSTs, all to whitelisted destinations.
- Reputation: 3 engines rated the site malicious and 1 suspicious, including a tier-one vendor. Two abuse reports tied to a shared CDN address were discounted as shared-infrastructure noise.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured homepage contains no about page, terms, privacy policy, company name, licence, or registration number. There is no on-site disclosure to evaluate, and the site's real-world operator has not been independently established. No third-party broker record was matched, which is neutral and not a clearance. The valid organisation-validated certificate identifies the hosting platform and not the site's operator, so it cannot vouch for the site's identity or intent. This is a verification gap and not by itself proof of wrongdoing. The adverse reputation findings above are what drive the risk posture.


Evidence:
- Homepage: it carries no legal, licensing, or corporate-identity content in the captured text.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV), subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.

### What to Verify Next

No account login, credential entry, or financial transaction should be attempted on this site. If the link arrived through an unsolicited message, advertisement, or QR code, the sender should be contacted through a known-good channel to confirm what the link was meant to reach. The legitimate operator, if any, should be identified from an independent source, and the hosting platform's abuse channel can be used to report the concealed-form behaviour. Any official support or contact channels should be confirmed through an offline or independently sourced route. The site's reputation status should be re-checked only after the owner has demonstrably cleaned or removed the content.


Evidence:
- Homepage: it offers no visible service that would justify credential entry, yet it contains password-bearing forms.
- Reputation findings: the confirmed blacklisting is the reason authentication and payments are classed as unsafe.
- Page identity: no operator, company, or contact details are displayed to confirm through an independent route.

### Summary Verdict

The site carries an elevated risk posture and is classed as unsafe for sensitive interaction. The adverse external detections and the concealed credential-capable forms converge, and neither the site's content nor its technical configuration offers countervailing legitimacy evidence. Read-only observation is the only use consistent with the assessment.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Amazon Web Services edge infrastructure. All four observed addresses are CDN edge servers, and the origin server was not observable. Edge-only visibility prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content swaps. The use of a mainstream, trusted provider is a mitigating factor only. It does not offset the external reputation risk and does not indicate legitimacy.


### Closing Assessment

Prospective users should not log in, enter credentials, or make payments, and should treat the destination as untrustworthy until independent evidence of its operator and cleanup status exists.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH`)
- The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | 0 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [famous-kheer-db82b0.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/famous-kheer-db82b0.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-bfw.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-bfw.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-klu.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-klu.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-zpl.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-zpl.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-li7.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-li7.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-fog.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-fog.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-l7t.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-l7t.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-74u.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-74u.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [ultronics.cash](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ultronics.cash), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100)
- [packscan.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/packscan.org), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-c40.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-22.*