--- title: "Is portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 25/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app" verdict: "Low Trust" title: "Is portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app Safe? Score 25/100" trust_score: 25 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app assessed: 2026-10-20 --- # Is portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 25/100.** portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky. Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | The page is a Netlify-hosted 404 'Site not found' error with no site content, forms, or business claims. It gives no basis for assessing the underlying website's purpose or trustworthiness. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png) _What portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This is a subdomain on a shared static-hosting platform. When analysed, it returned only the platform's generic "Site not found" error page, with no products, services, company name, contact details, or stated purpose. Its apparent purpose and business model cannot be inferred from the page. The hostname wording ("portal", "moonshot") suggests an access or login portal, but the page itself shows nothing to support that. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Active contradictions are present, and the posture is cautionary. Third-party security intelligence currently blacklists this host. Several engines flag it as malicious, including a tier-one security vendor, and an aggregated external blacklist assessment concurs. The page shows no phishing content, but a 404 error page cannot explain a blacklisting. That suggests the host has served different content, or content that varies by path, from what the analysis captured. The behavioural sandbox supports this concern. Across all three runs it detected hidden forms and password-type form fields on a page that displays only an error message. After interaction, the page also underwent a very large number of DOM changes, far more than a static 404 should produce. This pattern is consistent with a credential-capture kit staged behind a placeholder, although the evidence does not show what the forms submit to. The hostname also closely resembles the hosting platform's own domain. That resemblance is a soft lookalike indicator, not confirmed impersonation. The only abuse reports concern a shared, provider-operated network address, so they are discounted and are not held against this site. The site's operator cannot be linked to any real-world person or brand. Evidence: - Homepage: the page is a hosting-provider "Site not found" 404 response with no business content, yet hidden forms were detected in every sandbox run and password-type fields were present. - Homepage: sandbox observed 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction on a 368-character error page, with 3 console errors. - Domain provenance: the domain is about 13 days old (~0.04 years), with one archive snapshot spanning 2026 only (first and last seen 2026-10-07), so there is no historical track record. - Reputation: 3 malicious and 1 suspicious detections, with one tier-one vendor among them; the 2 abuse reports relate to shared infrastructure and carry no confidence weight. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The page carries no legal, identity, or licensing disclosures of any kind. It has no terms, privacy policy, about page, company name, registration number, or regulator reference, and no licence is claimed. For a page that offers nothing, this is a content gap, not a finding of fraud. Ownership opacity applies: nothing connects the site to an accountable legal entity. No third-party broker or regulatory-database entry matched this site, so there is no external reputational context to weigh. The site's transport encryption is valid but is only organisation-level validation issued to the hosting platform. It shows the platform's identity and says nothing about whoever operates this subdomain. Evidence: - Homepage: no company name, licence, contact channel, or legal documentation is present. - Transport encryption: certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV) to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19. - Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US). ### What to Verify Next Before any interaction, the most direct step is to establish through an independent route whether the intended operator actually controls this exact hostname. Use an official channel already known to the user, such as a previously issued contact or a printed notice. Do not rely on any link or message that led to this address. Check whether the sender, brand, or counterparty claims this portal and whether they confirm this exact subdomain. Any legitimate operator would normally use its own registered domain, not a freshly created shared-hosting subdomain. If the address came from an unsolicited message, treat the message itself as suspect and report it to the apparent brand's security team. Reputation status should be re-checked after any cleanup claim before the site is reconsidered. Evidence: - Homepage: the page offers no way to confirm who operates it, so confirmation must come from outside the site. - Hostname: the shared-hosting subdomain format does not match an established corporate domain. - Reputation: current third-party detections stand and no remediation has been shown. ### Summary Verdict The site is rated as low trust with elevated risk. Active third-party blacklisting and suspicious hidden-form behaviour on a content-free page outweigh the valid encryption and the stable response behaviour observed. The apparent legitimacy of the site cannot be established, and the concerns about it are specific and current. ### Infrastructure Integrity The host sits behind AWS-fronted CDN/WAF infrastructure. All four observed addresses are edge servers, and no origin server was observable. This is a mitigating factor for availability, but it is not evidence of legitimacy. Edge-only visibility prevents independent verification of what actually hosts the content. It also makes it easy to swap what the site serves quickly, which matches the discrepancy between the benign 404 and the external detections. ### Closing Assessment This site should not be used for login, credential entry, or any financial interaction. Any password, payment detail, or wallet connection should be withheld, and nothing should be downloaded from it. If it must be opened for investigation, do so only in an isolated, read-only environment. Anyone who has already entered credentials here should change them immediately and enable multi-factor authentication. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content. ### 01 External reputation - Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 04 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 05 Page content - The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 50% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app. - The request stayed on portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-07. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 | | Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-10-07 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [crypto-hwz.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-hwz.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-kad.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-kad.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 32/100) - [portal-moonshot-ky6.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-ky6.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [portal-moonshot-wo8.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-wo8.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-jrt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-jrt.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-yfo.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-yfo.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [portal-moonshot-xz3.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-xz3.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-uux.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-uux.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [connect-dappsconnect.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/connect-dappsconnect.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100) - [connect-application.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/connect-application.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-dsx.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*