--- title: "Is portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app a Scam? Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 70 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app assessed: 2026-10-22 --- # Is portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 70%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 13 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 18 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (85 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png) _What portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This website is a subdomain on a shared application-hosting platform. The captured homepage shows only a short "Site not found" placeholder, with no branding, product description, or stated service, so its purpose and business model cannot be determined from what it presents. The address has the form of a "portal" for a project called "moonshot". The page still carries login-type form machinery in its underlying code, so it can act as an access or sign-in front end regardless of its blank appearance. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk The most serious finding is a **confirmed blacklist-level reputation problem**. Multiple independent security engines currently flag the site as malicious, including several major, widely deployed security vendors, and the combined count is high enough to trigger an automatic critical-risk override. No identity contradiction was observed, because no conflicting legal entities appear. No brand impersonation was confirmed, and no phishing content was captured on the page itself. The risk therefore rests on the external detections and on how the site behaves. The site's behavior reinforces this. Concealed forms appeared on every one of three independent test runs, and password-entry forms are present even though the visible page offers nothing to sign in to. Page content shifted heavily after simulated interaction, and almost all network activity went to external destinations. The visible page does not explain any of this. Together, these behaviors fit a credential-collection front end that hides its function behind an innocuous or empty page. That inference is not a confirmed finding of credential theft. Two abuse reports exist against a hosting address associated with the site. They apply to shared provider infrastructure with no reporter confidence, so they are discounted and do not add weight. The domain is also extremely young. A site that appears within weeks and is already widely flagged fits the pattern of disposable, short-lived campaign infrastructure. Evidence: - Homepage capture: the page returned a "Site not found" placeholder with minimal text, and no product, company, or service is described. - Behavioral testing: concealed forms were detected in 3 of 3 runs, and password-type forms were present on the page. - Behavioral testing: DOM mutations reached 4,130 after interaction, and about 99.6% of network activity at peak was external. - Domain registered about 20 days before analysis (~0.05 years old, 2026). The web archive shows 85 snapshots between 2026-10-01 and 2026-10-09, all within the first year of existence. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured page names no operating company, legal entity, registration number, licence, or regulator, and it has no terms, privacy, or contact content. This is a gap in disclosure from an unknown operator, and **ownership opacity** applies. It carries no independent regulatory standing, and no third-party broker listing matched it. The valid, organisation-validated transport certificate and the reputable hosting provider are real positives. They only show that the platform is properly configured. They do not identify the site operator, and they cannot offset the external threat detections. Evidence: - Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is OV-validated and issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19. It identifies the hosting platform, not the site's operator. - Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US). - Homepage and site pages: no legal entity, licence, or regulatory registration is stated anywhere in the captured content. ### What to Verify Next Do not enter credentials or make payments on this site, and confirm independently that it has any legitimate purpose. Anyone who received a link to it should establish who sent it and why, using a separate trusted channel such as a known phone number or an in-person contact. Any organisation that claims to operate this portal should be asked to confirm its official address by a route that does not pass through this site. A security team should keep the address out of user workflows and may add it to its monitoring or blocking lists. If credentials were already entered, they should be changed immediately on the real service and the account reviewed for unauthorised activity. Evidence: - Concealed login-type forms are present on the page, so any link to it should be treated as potentially credential-collecting. - The page offers no stated service or operator, so there is no on-site basis for trusting a request to sign in. - The extremely recent registration leaves no track record that would give the site an established reputation. ### Summary Verdict The site presents an elevated, high-risk posture. Several independent security sources flag it as malicious, and its behavior is consistent with a hidden credential-handling front end. The operator is unknown and nothing on the page establishes legitimacy. Technical hygiene is adequate but is not a mitigating factor against these findings. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site runs behind a content delivery and web-application protection layer on Amazon infrastructure. All observed addresses are edge servers, and the origin is not visible. This is a mitigating factor only and says nothing about the operator's intent. Edge-only visibility prevents independent confirmation of where the content is actually hosted, and it can mask rapid content swaps, which suits short-lived campaigns. ### Closing Assessment At most, the site should be viewed read-only, and only from an isolated or non-sensitive environment. No login, credential entry, or financial interaction should take place, and the address should be reported or blocked wherever the user's organisation applies such controls. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`) - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app. - The request stayed on portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-01. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 | | Domain age | 0.05 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-10-01 | | Archive snapshots | 85 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 13 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [crypto-d4w.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-d4w.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [portal-moonshot-ydq.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-ydq.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-til.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-til.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-6dy.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-6dy.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-gez.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-gez.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [okxclaim-robinhood.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/okxclaim-robinhood.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-7lc.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-7lc.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-pod.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-pod.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [curve-finance-w3.web.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/curve-finance-w3.web.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [promptrectifyapprove.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/promptrectifyapprove.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-fja.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-22.*