---
title: "Is portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 25/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app Safe? Score 25/100"
trust_score: 25
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 25/100.** portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | The page is a Netlify 'Site not found' 404 error, meaning the requested site or path is not deployed. It contains no service description, forms, links, or commercial content, so no business trust assessment can be made. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 6 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a bare subdomain on the Netlify shared hosting platform, and a visitor sees only a generic "Site not found" 404 notice. The page says the requested site or path is not deployed and links to the host's troubleshooting guide and a "Start building" prompt. It contains no business description, products, pricing, contact details, legal information or other commercial content. Its apparent purpose cannot be established from what it serves. The host name ("portal-moonshot-ixz") reads like a placeholder or staging label for a login-style portal rather than a branded service.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and the posture is cautionary. Several independent security engines currently flag the host as malicious, including two established tier-one vendors, which amounts to a confirmed **blacklist** listing. A page that renders only a hosting error would not normally attract that level of detection. The host name also closely resembles the hosting platform's own naming, which triggered a brand-proximity heuristic. No brand impersonation or phishing page was confirmed, so that heuristic is a weak supporting indicator and not a finding in its own right. The more serious concern is behavioural. Although the visible page has no forms, the sandbox found concealed forms in every one of three runs, including password-type fields. It also recorded very large DOM changes after interaction and a destination mismatch in the final navigation. This pattern is consistent with a placeholder that can be swapped for credential-harvesting content, or with content that is shown selectively. The two abuse reports against a neighbouring address on the provider's shared infrastructure are discounted. They cannot be attributed to this site and are not counted against it. No conflicting legal identities were observed, since the site publishes no identity content at all.


Evidence:
- Homepage: security engines currently flag the host (6 malicious and 1 suspicious detections, including two tier-one vendors), which constitutes the confirmed blacklist signal.
- Homepage, sandbox behaviour: hidden forms were present in 3 of 3 runs, with password-type fields, on a page that visibly shows only a 404 notice. DOM mutations after interaction reached 4,130.
- Provider's shared infrastructure: 2 abuse reports, with zero abuse confidence, apply to a shared provider address and are discounted.
- Domain provenance: roughly 13 days of observable history, and a single archive snapshot (first and last seen 2026-10-07, 1 year tracked), so there is no established track record.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site presents no company name, operator, jurisdiction, license, registration number, terms, privacy policy or contact channel, so real-world identity cannot be linked to any entity. This is **ownership opacity**. It is not an identity contradiction. It is also a verification gap in its own right, and it cannot support any claim that the site is legitimate or regulated. No third-party broker or regulatory listing matched the host, and the absence of a match is not a verdict either way. The transport-layer credentials are technically valid but say nothing about who operates the site. They show only that the host holds a certificate issued to the hosting platform and not to an independent business.


Evidence:
- Homepage: no operator name, license, registration number, legal pages or contact details are published.
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is organisation-validated (OV), issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, and valid to 2027-03-19. The subject is the hosting platform, not the site operator.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Before any interaction, the first step is to establish whether the intended counterparty actually issued this address. Confirm that through an independent, offline or previously known official channel, and do not rely on the link, message or advertisement that led to the host. Anyone who received this address in an unsolicited message should also check whether the sender's account is genuine. The host's detection status should be re-checked before the address is ever revisited, to see whether the listings have been cleared. A site that claims to represent a financial service should be traced to a registered legal entity and a licensing record through the relevant public registry, using only identifiers obtained independently of this site.


Evidence:
- Homepage: no service or entity is described, so nothing on the page can be used to confirm who the site claims to be.
- Sandbox behaviour: the concealed password-type forms in all three runs mean that any later content served from this host needs fresh inspection before use.
- Detection status: six malicious detections are currently recorded, and those listings should be checked for clearance.

### Summary Verdict

The available evidence supports a low-trust, elevated-risk posture. Confirmed adverse reputation from multiple engines, combined with concealed credential-type form behaviour and no verifiable operator, outweighs the technically sound encryption and the benign appearance of the visible page. The site is not a proven fraud, but nothing about it establishes legitimacy.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The host is delivered through AWS-fronted edge infrastructure, and all four observed addresses are provider edge nodes. Because no origin address is observable, hosting cannot be verified independently, and content could be swapped quickly without any visible change in the hosting footprint. The well-known provider and the technically sound certificate lower the infrastructure-level risk, but they do not offset the reputation findings and do not show that the site is legitimate.


### Closing Assessment

Treat the host as unsuitable for any login, credential entry, payment or financial interaction, and limit contact to passive viewing at most. Users who were directed here should not enter personal or account details. They should report the link to the platform or organisation it claimed to represent.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, page content, history in the web archive.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 04 Page content
- The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW`)

### 05 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-07. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-07 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 6 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [portal-moonshot-rp2.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-rp2.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-hx5.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-hx5.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [claimbdagtoken.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claimbdagtoken.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 43/100)
- [multidapp-sync.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/multidapp-sync.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 34/100)
- [devve-rectify.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/devve-rectify.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 32/100)
- [ethercentricpro.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ethercentricpro.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 29/100)
- [votingchoicemonitor.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votingchoicemonitor.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 46/100)
- [openseptembertrendingscore.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/openseptembertrendingscore.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [fluxbeam-dex.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fluxbeam-dex.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 29/100)
- [xmem.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xmem.live), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 41/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-ixz.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*