---
title: "Is portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app a Scam? Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-19
---

# Is portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-19 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | The page is a Netlify 'Site not found' 404 error screen. It contains no business content, forms, or claims to evaluate, and shows no deception signals; the intended site's purpose cannot be determined. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 5 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-19. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a subdomain on the Netlify hosting platform, and it currently serves only the platform's generic "Site not found" 404 error screen. A visitor sees a short notice about a broken link or non-existent address, a platform support reference, a Netlify internal identifier and an invitation to start building a site. No products, services, branding or business model are presented, so the intended purpose of the address cannot be determined from what it shows.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

**Confirmed external blacklist detections** are the decisive concern. Several independent security engines flag the address as malicious, including a tier-one security vendor. That qualifies as a confirmed blacklist hit and outweighs every neutral or favourable technical attribute. The address is also a near-exact lookalike of the legitimate Netlify platform domain, and the page analysis suspects brand imitation on that basis. The visible content is the real platform's error template. The lookalike pattern fits a freshly provisioned throwaway deployment that can be swapped for different content at any time. Behavioural testing shows a further discrepancy: hidden forms, including password-type fields, were detected in all three sandbox runs, and heavy page restructuring followed interaction. The visible page contains no forms at all. That mismatch is the kind of behaviour associated with credential-harvesting kits and warrants serious concern. Two abuse reports were also recorded against a cloud-provider network address associated with this site. They relate to shared provider infrastructure and carry no confidence weighting, so they are discounted and not treated as evidence against the site. No conflicting legal identities and no confirmed phishing page were observed, but the blacklist and behavioural evidence alone keep the risk elevated. Evidence:

- Homepage capture: 404 "Site not found" template, with no business content, claims or visible forms.
- Reputation checks: five engines report the address as malicious, including one tier-one vendor, and the address is on an external blacklist.
- Sandbox behaviour: hidden forms with password fields in 3 of 3 runs, and 4,132 page mutations after interaction.
- Domain provenance: registered in 2026 (~15 days old); 1 archive snapshot, dated 2026-10-04 (1 year tracked).

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page contains no legal, terms, privacy or about content, so no operator name, company registration, licence claim or contact channel can be assessed. No licence was claimed, so none can be verified. This is a verification gap, not evidence of wrongdoing, and real-world identity of the operator stays unconfirmed. No third-party broker record matched the address, so there is no external reputational signal from that source in either direction. A valid organisation-validated certificate is in place, but it reflects the hosting platform's own certificate and says nothing about who operates the content behind this address. Evidence:

- Homepage capture: no company name, licence, jurisdiction, policy pages or contact details present.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1, OV validation, subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Third-party broker dataset: no match for this address.

### What to Verify Next

Any party considering contact should first ask the supposed sender or promoter, through a previously known and independent channel, which exact address is official and whether this subdomain was ever issued by them. If a legitimate business is claimed, its identity and any licence should be confirmed directly with the relevant registry, not through anything on this address. Re-examining the address later may show whether it begins serving real content. Even then, the blacklist status should be re-checked and cleared before it is treated as safe. Confirming the official support and contact channels of any organisation referencing this link is also prudent. Evidence:

- Homepage capture: the page offers no outbound links, social profiles or identifying details to corroborate.
- Page type: error page with an empty title and meta description, so there is nothing to check against a claimed identity.
- Behavioural testing: hidden password-type forms are present despite the visible page showing none, so any later content should be re-tested.

### Summary Verdict

The address is assessed as **high risk**. Confirmed blacklist detections, a lookalike of a well-known platform domain, a very recent registration and form behaviour that contradicts the visible page together outweigh the valid certificate and mainstream hosting. No credible basis exists to treat the address as legitimate, and the operator's real-world identity remains unestablished.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served through Amazon Web Services edge infrastructure, with all four observed addresses belonging to the same provider network and no origin server visible. This is a recognised, reputable provider and is a mitigating factor only. It cannot offset the external threat detections, and edge-only visibility also prevents independent confirmation of what sits behind the address and allows content to be replaced quickly.


### Closing Assessment

Treat the address as unsafe for login, credential entry and any financial interaction, and use it, if at all, only for passive viewing. Do not enter passwords or payment details, and do not follow instructions that arrive with a link to it until a trusted channel confirms the address.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 04 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 05 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-04. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-04 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 5 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [portal-moonshot-esj.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-esj.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-7lr.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-7lr.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-mru.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-mru.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-5wb.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-5wb.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-0w6.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-0w6.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-jk0.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-jk0.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-efk.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-efk.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-n8x.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-n8x.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [hyperliqd-1288.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hyperliqd-1288.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [livepumpfunsol.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/livepumpfunsol.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-jbe.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-19.*
