---
title: "Is portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app a Scam? Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-21
---

# Is portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | Netlify 'Site not found' 404 page stating that the requested site or path does not exist on Netlify. The page contains no service description, offers, forms, or contact details. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 6 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a subdomain on a shared hosting platform that returns a generic "Site not found" error page. The page says the requested site or path does not exist on that platform and offers only a prompt to build a free site there. It shows no products, services, forms, contact details or monetization model. Its portal-style hostname suggests it was meant to front an account or access portal. In its current state it works as a dead or unclaimed deployment that carries no business content.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Multiple independent threat-intelligence engines currently classify this host as malicious, including a tier-one security vendor, which amounts to a **confirmed blacklist-level detection**. This is the decisive finding and the main driver of the cautionary posture. The page analysis also flags the hostname as a close lookalike of the hosting platform's own domain, a typosquat-style naming pattern commonly used to borrow the credibility of a well-known brand. Behavioral testing adds a mismatch between content and behavior. The visible page is a bare error message with no form, yet all three sandbox runs detected hidden forms, including password-type input fields. The page also showed very heavy DOM mutation after interaction, far more than a static 404 page should produce. Hidden credential-capable forms behind a blank facade are a recognized credential-harvesting pattern, so the site should be treated as a possible phishing staging page. The four abuse reports against an edge address in the hosting range are attributed to shared infrastructure. They are not specific to this site and are not counted as evidence of operator misconduct. No conflicting legal identities were observed, since the page names no entity at all. No malformed contact address was observed either.


Evidence:
- Homepage: the page presents only a platform 404 message and a "start building" prompt, with no operator, offer or contact information.
- Reputation: 6 malicious detections from threat-intelligence engines, including one tier-one vendor, and no reported suspicious-only detections.
- Sandbox behavior: hidden forms were detected in 3 of 3 runs, along with password-type fields and about 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction, none of which is visible on the rendered page.
- Brand analysis: the hostname was flagged as a strong lookalike of the hosting platform's domain.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The page contains no legal, terms, privacy or about content, and no company name, registration number or license claim. No regulated activity is claimed, so there is no licensing representation to assess. No broker-reputation record exists for this host. The operator cannot be linked to any real-world person or organization. The only identifying artifact is the platform's own branding, which concerns the hosting provider and says nothing about the tenant. The transport encryption is valid, but it only shows that the platform secured the connection. It does not establish who controls the content behind the hostname.


Evidence:
- Homepage: no legal-entity name, address, license or registration reference appears.
- Transport security: the TLS certificate is OV-validated, issued to the hosting platform's organization by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1, and valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting: the site is served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, US).
- Third-party context: no broker or regulator record matches this host.

### What to Verify Next

Anyone who received this address through a message, advertisement or QR code should establish through an independent route, such as a known phone number or an official website typed in manually, whether the sender actually intended to point to a portal at this hostname. If the address was presented as the login page of a known organization, that organization should be asked to confirm it, and the address should be reported to its security team and to the hosting platform's abuse desk. Organizations that expected a legitimate deployment here should check their own platform account for stale, hijacked or unauthorized site configurations. Any official support or contact channels should be confirmed from the organization's own domain rather than from this host.


Evidence:
- Homepage: the page itself directs the owner to the platform's troubleshooting guide, which confirms that the deployment is not currently serving content.
- Sandbox behavior: hidden password-type fields were present on a page with no visible form, so any prompt to authenticate here is unexpected.
- Reputation: the current malicious classification is the reference point for deciding whether further contact is warranted.

### Summary Verdict

The assessment is elevated risk with a clearly cautionary posture. Confirmed threat-intelligence detections, concealed credential-capable form behavior and a brand-lookalike hostname converge on a site that should be treated as a potential phishing or credential-capture asset. It has no verifiable operator and no legitimate content to offset these indicators. Its valid encryption certificate and platform hosting do not change this posture.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is hosted on Amazon-operated infrastructure behind the platform's CDN layer, and all observed addresses are edge nodes. The origin server could not be observed. This is a mitigating factor only, because the infrastructure is reputable and reliably available. It cannot offset the threat detections, and edge-only visibility prevents independent confirmation of where the content is actually served from. It also means content can be swapped quickly without any change at the network level.


### Closing Assessment

This host should be treated as read-only at most: no logins, credentials, payment details or file downloads should be entered or accepted here. Anyone who has already submitted credentials or sensitive information should change those credentials immediately and enable multi-factor authentication. Links to this address should be reported and not forwarded.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)
- The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH`)
- The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION`)

### 03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 6 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [crypto-oht.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-oht.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [pump-voting-r1.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-voting-r1.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [vocal-piroshki-bef531.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vocal-piroshki-bef531.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-gqv.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-gqv.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-fmt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-fmt.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-eht.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-eht.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-dlr.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-dlr.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-bhp.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-bhp.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [medhaint.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/medhaint.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [ainfinitytakeovers.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ainfinitytakeovers.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-lmc.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-21.*