--- title: "Is portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 25/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app" verdict: "Low Trust" title: "Is portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app Safe? Score 25/100" trust_score: 25 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app assessed: 2026-10-20 --- # Is portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 25/100.** portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky. Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | The page is a Netlify 'Site not found' error response for a path that does not exist. It contains no service description, forms, links, or commercial content, so no trust or financial assessment of the underlying site is possible. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 6 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 18 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png) _What portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. The website is a subdomain on Netlify's free hosting platform. When visited, it returns only a generic "Site not found" error page. That page states that the visitor followed a broken link or entered a URL that does not exist on the platform, and it offers a prompt to build and deploy a new site. It shows no products, services, pricing, branding, legal text or contact details. No monetization or business model can be identified, and the apparent purpose of the address cannot be determined from what it presents. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Active threat-intelligence signals make this a **high-risk** address. Several independent security engines currently classify it as malicious, and two of them are major, widely used vendors. This amounts to a confirmed external blacklisting, and it is the decisive factor in the assessment. No phishing page, brand impersonation or conflicting legal identity was confirmed. The page-level analysis flagged no fraud indicators on the visible error content. The visible page is nonetheless not the whole picture. Behavioral testing of the address found concealed forms that were present across every test run, including password-type fields. This is inconsistent with a bare 404 page, which has no reason to carry any form. The test runs also recorded very heavy page restructuring after interaction and a final destination that differed from the requested one. These are the behaviors that credential-harvesting or redirect infrastructure typically shows. The address is also very recently established. The most plausible reading is a short-lived, throwaway deployment whose real content is not served to a plain visit. A compromised or abandoned deployment cannot be excluded, but the evidence does not establish it. The combination of external malicious listings, concealed credential fields and a brand-new, ephemeral presence calls for a clearly cautionary stance. Evidence: - Homepage: the visible content is solely a hosting-platform "Site not found" response with no service description, links or contact information. - Behavioral testing of the homepage: three concealed forms were detected across all three runs, with password-type fields, together with a final destination that did not match the requested address. - Behavioral testing: 4,130 page mutations were recorded after interaction, and 36 external network requests were made, of which 15 were external data requests. - Domain provenance: the address was first observed about 17 days before analysis (registered 2026, roughly 0.05 years old). The web archive holds a single snapshot, dated 2026-10-03, so there is no meaningful history. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured page carries no legal-identity, terms, privacy or licensing content, and it names no operating company. As a result, nothing links the address to a real-world operator, and its identity remains unverified. This is a verification gap in its own right. No regulatory registration is claimed or evidenced, and no broker-reputation record matched. The valid, organization-validated transport-encryption certificate was issued to the hosting platform itself. It confirms encrypted transport to that platform and says nothing about who operates this particular subdomain. It therefore provides no legitimacy for the address. The address is hosted on a major cloud provider, which is neutral and not a trust endorsement. Evidence: - Transport security: the TLS certificate is OV-validated, issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, and is valid to 2027-03-19. - Hosting: the site is served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US). - Content: the homepage contains no company name, registration number, licence reference or terms of service. ### What to Verify Next Any party that directed a user to this address should be asked to confirm the correct, current address through an independent channel, such as an official website reached by typing it directly, a printed document or a known phone number. The identity of the operator should be established before any interaction. The address should be re-checked only after the malicious listings clear and a legitimate site with real legal and contact pages is live. For anyone who has already visited, a check of whether credentials or personal data were entered, and a password reset if so, is a prudent step. Official support or contact channels should be confirmed through a source independent of this address. Evidence: - Homepage: no operator identity or contact route is presented that could be used to authenticate the address. - Behavioral testing: concealed password-type fields were detected on a page that visibly has no login. - External intelligence: the malicious listings are current at the time of analysis, so any later re-check should confirm they have been cleared. ### Summary Verdict The address carries an elevated, high-risk trust posture. Confirmed external malicious listings drive the assessment, and the behavioral evidence, the lack of any verifiable operator and the extremely recent, ephemeral nature of the presence reinforce it. The available evidence does not support treating it as a legitimate, established service. ### Infrastructure Integrity The address is delivered through Amazon-operated edge infrastructure. All four observed addresses are edge nodes, and the origin host was not observable. That limits independent verification of where the content actually resides and allows content to be swapped quickly without any visible trace. A small number of abuse reports exist against one of the shared edge addresses. They are attributed to the shared provider infrastructure, carry no confidence weight and are discounted, so they say nothing about this specific site. The protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only. It does not offset the reputation risk from the external malicious listings. ### Closing Assessment The address should be treated as unsafe for any sensitive interaction. Login, credential entry and any financial activity should be avoided, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Any contact about it should be handled through independently verified channels. If it was reached through a link, message or advertisement, that source should be treated with suspicion and reported. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 04 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 05 Page content - The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 50% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app. - The request stayed on portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-03. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 | | Domain age | 0.05 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-10-03 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 6 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [crypto-npy.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-npy.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-t4j.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-t4j.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-yx9.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-yx9.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-br2.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-br2.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-sni.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-sni.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-lps.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-lps.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-ob4.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-ob4.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-pwy.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-pwy.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [connect-dappsconnect.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/connect-dappsconnect.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100) - [connect-application.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/connect-application.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27) - [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites) - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*