--- title: "Is portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app a Scam? Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app assessed: 2026-10-21 --- # Is portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | The URL returns a Netlify 'Site not found' 404 page, indicating the requested path or site does not exist. The page contains no business content, services, or forms to assess. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 6 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted | | Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png) _What portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. - The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. The website is a subdomain on the Netlify hosting platform, with a name that suggests a "portal" or "moonshot" service. When captured, it served only a generic "Site not found" 404 error page, with no product, company, contact or legal content. Its purpose and business model cannot be determined from what it presents, and the address does not resolve to any identifiable service. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present. Several independent security engines, including a tier-one antivirus vendor, classify the address as malicious, and the aggregate reputation outcome amounts to a confirmed **blacklist** listing. Nothing on the page explains these detections. The hosting platform's 404 text is all that is visible, so the reputation damage cannot be attributed to any disclosed activity. No phishing page, impersonated brand or conflicting legal identity was observed, and no identity contradiction exists. The behavioural analysis conflicts with the benign appearance of the page. In all three sandbox runs, hidden forms were detected on what is visually an error page, and password-type form fields were present. After interaction the page produced a very large number of DOM mutations, which is inconsistent with a static 404 response. Nearly all network activity went to external destinations, though none of it was to non-whitelisted endpoints. A page that looks like an error screen but carries concealed credential-capture-style form elements is a pattern commonly seen when a phishing kit is staged or swapped in behind a neutral front. This is a behavioural indicator, not proof. The page analyser also flagged strong name similarity to the hosting platform's own domain. That is probably a consequence of the shared platform subdomain, not a confirmed brand impersonation, but it adds to the cautionary picture. Evidence: - Homepage: the visible content is only a "Site not found" notice with a hosting-platform support link and a "Start building" prompt, and no business content. - Sandbox behaviour: hidden forms were seen in 3 of 3 runs, together with password-field forms and about 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction. - Network behaviour: about 99.6% of requests at peak went to external hosts, including 15 external XHR/fetch calls and 21 external POSTs, all to whitelisted destinations. - Reputation: 6 security engines reported the address as malicious. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The site presents no legal, licensing or corporate-identity pages of any kind. The only captured page is a platform error screen, so there is no registration number, regulator reference or named operator to assess. Because the site publishes nothing, the real-world operator remains unverified, and ownership and governance are opaque. This is a lack of disclosure, not evidence of fraud by itself. The reputation findings above carry the risk assessment, and no third-party broker or regulatory warning was matched. The site's transport encryption is technically sound, but that proves nothing about the operator's identity or intent. The certificate is organisation-validated, but the organisation named is the hosting platform, not the site's own operator. Evidence: - Technical identity: Served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US). - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV), subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19. - Legal pages: no terms, privacy, about or contact page was captured, and no licence is claimed. - Third-party registry: no broker or regulatory-listing match was found. ### What to Verify Next Any contact with this address should start from an independent, trusted channel. Confirm through an offline or previously known route whether the organisation that supplied the link actually operates a portal under this name. Confirm that the exact hostname matches the official one, since the Netlify-hosted address pattern is easy to imitate. Check whether the hosting platform or the claimed organisation has any record of the site and its current owner. If the link arrived by unsolicited email, message or advertisement, treat it as untrusted and report it to the platform's abuse channel and to the organisation it appears to represent. Evidence: - Hostname: the name contains a generic "portal-moonshot" label on a shared platform subdomain, which anyone can register. - Page state: the live page returns a platform 404, so no official content exists to compare against. - Behaviour: the hidden credential-style forms observed in the sandbox are a further reason to confirm the official address first. ### Summary Verdict The site carries an elevated, clearly cautionary risk posture. Independent threat detections, together with concealed form activity on a page that should be inert, outweigh the technically valid encryption and the absence of any identified operator. Legitimacy cannot be established, and the available evidence points toward a site that should be treated as potentially hostile. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind Amazon-operated edge infrastructure in the US, and every observed address is an edge node, so the origin server is not observable. This is a mitigating factor only, as it offers some protection against direct exposure. It also blocks independent verification of the real host, and it can allow content to be swapped quickly without visible change. The abuse reports recorded against one of the edge addresses apply to shared provider infrastructure and are not attributable to this site specifically. They therefore carry little weight. The reputation findings above, not the infrastructure, drive the assessment. ### Closing Assessment No login, credential entry, payment or financial interaction is appropriate with this address, and any link to it received unsolicited should not be followed. At most, passive viewing is acceptable in an isolated environment. Anyone who has already entered credentials here should change them immediately and enable multi-factor authentication where available. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`) - The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH`) - The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION`) ### 03 Page content - The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 50% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app. - The request stayed on portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 | | Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 6 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [usdt-transfer-bep-1-5.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/usdt-transfer-bep-1-5.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [eventchecker-rb.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/eventchecker-rb.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [send-bep-01.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-bep-01.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [dazzling-valkyrie-11a286.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dazzling-valkyrie-11a286.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [send-usd-trust.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-usd-trust.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [jptcheckstatus-ui.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/jptcheckstatus-ui.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [checknewlistvote-ui.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/checknewlistvote-ui.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [dawaid-sessionmints.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dawaid-sessionmints.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [krause-fahrzeuge.de](https://trustsniffer.com/report/krause-fahrzeuge.de), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [devwatchaudit.casa](https://trustsniffer.com/report/devwatchaudit.casa), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-rhe.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-21.*