---
title: "Is portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app a Scam? Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 18 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | 2 snapshots (2 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

The website is a recently created subdomain on a shared static-site hosting platform, with a name suggesting a "portal". When captured, its homepage served only a short "Site not found" notice. The page showed no products, branding, company description or stated purpose. Yet automated browsing sessions recorded large page changes after interaction, along with concealed form elements. The apparent function is therefore a credential-collecting or interactive portal whose real nature cannot be read from the visible content.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The site is **blacklisted** by external threat sources. Several independent security engines flagged it as malicious and another as suspicious, and one of the flagging vendors is a leading tier-one security provider. This confirmed listing is the decisive risk factor. It is reinforced by behavioral findings. Concealed form elements appeared in every automated session, and password-entry fields were present on a page that displays only a "not found" message. That mismatch between visible content and hidden functionality is a recognized pattern of credential-harvesting staging pages. Nearly all network traffic went to external destinations, though those destinations were recognized and non-suspicious. The pages also underwent very heavy structural rewriting after interaction. This is consistent with content being injected or swapped dynamically after load. No wallet-draining behavior, clipboard manipulation, or visitor-dependent cloaking was observed. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were identified. The risk therefore rests on the confirmed external listing and the concealed-form behavior, not on a demonstrated copy of a known brand. Ownership opacity is present but is not treated as an identity contradiction. Evidence:

- Homepage: multiple external security engines, including one tier-one vendor, classify the domain as malicious or suspicious.
- Homepage behavioral sessions: concealed forms were detected in all three runs, including password-type inputs, beneath a page that visibly reads "Site not found".
- Domain provenance: first observed about 19 days ago (~0.05 years), registered in 2026, which is extremely young.
- Web archive: 2 snapshots, all in 2026 (1 year tracked), so no meaningful history exists.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page carries no legal entity name, licence, registration number, terms, privacy policy, or contact details. Disclosure transparency is therefore unclear. Real-world operator identity is unverified, and registration data is incomplete, which is administrative ownership opacity and not a contradiction in itself. The valid certificate does not identify the operator. It names the hosting platform as its subject, so it attests to the platform's infrastructure and not to the site's owner. No third-party broker or regulatory-registry match was found, which means no reputational or licensing signal exists either way. The absence of disclosures would normally be a verification gap only. Here it compounds the confirmed external listing and removes any independent basis for trusting the operator. Evidence:

- Homepage: roughly 368 characters of text, with no identifying, legal, or contractual content.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV), subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.

### What to Verify Next

Any claim of affiliation with a real organisation should be confirmed through that organisation's own known website, app, or published phone number, never through links or details taken from this site. The site's operator and any claimed licence should be checked against the relevant financial or commercial registry. Whoever supplied the address should be asked how it was obtained, since a not-found page gives no legitimate reason to enter data. Where a message, advertisement, or QR code led here, it should be reported to the platform or sender it came from. Official contact channels should be confirmed independently, offline where possible. Evidence:

- Homepage: no stated organisation or product, so no claim can be checked from the site itself.
- Legal and contact pages: none were observed in the capture, so no on-site registry reference exists to cross-check.

### Summary Verdict

The deterministic assessment places this site at the lowest tier of trust, driven by confirmed external threat listings and concealed credential-capable form behavior on a very new domain. Technical hygiene such as a valid certificate does not offset these findings. The site reads as high-risk and not as an established, legitimate service, and the operator's identity is unknown.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through AWS edge infrastructure. All four observed addresses are edge nodes, and the origin server is not observable, so the hosting arrangement cannot be independently verified. This protective layer is a mitigating factor only and cannot offset the reputation risk. Two abuse reports exist against an edge address, but they relate to a shared provider address used by many tenants. They are discounted and are not attributed to this site.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for login, credential entry, payments, or any financial interaction, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Any visit should be limited to passive, read-only viewing from an isolated environment, ideally avoided altogether. Anyone who already entered credentials or payment details should change those passwords immediately and monitor the affected accounts.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 04 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.05 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | 2 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-22a.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-t6c.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-t6c.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-hqj.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-hqj.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-2zp.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-2zp.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-man.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-man.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-ifl.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-ifl.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [get-memecoins.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/get-memecoins.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-11c.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-11c.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [blockdags-ef6.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockdags-ef6.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [downtofinance.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/downtofinance.org), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-uju.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-22.*