--- title: "Is portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 25/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app" verdict: "Low Trust" title: "Is portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app Safe? Score 25/100" trust_score: 25 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app assessed: 2026-10-20 --- # Is portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 25/100.** portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky. Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | The page is a Netlify 'Site not found' 404 response with a link to Netlify support and a deploy prompt. It contains no service description, so the site's purpose and business model cannot be determined. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 5 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png) _What portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. The site is a Netlify-hosted subdomain with a randomly styled "portal-moonshot" name. When visited, it serves only Netlify's generic "Site not found" 404 placeholder, which carries a support-guide link and a "Build and deploy your own site" prompt. It shows no products, pricing, company description, or commercial content, so its intended purpose or business model cannot be determined from what it presents. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Several converging contradictions make this a clearly cautionary case. Multiple independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag the domain as malicious, including a tier-one security vendor, and a confirmed **blacklist** listing is present. This is the decisive factor. The hostname also closely resembles its hosting provider's own domain, and the placeholder content reinforces that resemblance, which is consistent with a brand-lookalike pattern. Behavioural testing found concealed form elements and password-field structures in every run. The static 404 text shows no visible forms, and the page's DOM changed heavily after interaction. This mismatch between the visible content and the underlying page behaviour is typical of staged or swapped content. Outbound traffic stayed within allow-listed destinations, and no wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijack, or cloaking behaviour was seen. Abuse reports against one of the site's edge addresses are attributed to shared provider infrastructure, so they are a weak, non-specific signal and do not point at this site's operator. Identity and impersonation conflicts between legal entities were not observed, because no legal pages exist. Evidence: - Homepage: the only content is a "Site not found" 404 with a support link and a deploy prompt. It contains no business claims, forms, or links, but the sandbox detected hidden forms and password-form elements in all three runs. - Domain provenance: registered about 13 days before analysis (about 0.04 years old), with 1 archive snapshot, first and last seen on 2026-10-07 (1 year tracked). - Threat intelligence: 5 malicious and 1 suspicious detections across the reputation sources checked, including one tier-one vendor. - Behavioural sandbox: 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction, with 3 of 3 runs completing successfully. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The site publishes no legal, terms, privacy, about, or contact pages, and it makes no licensing or registration claim. Because the page is only a hosting placeholder, there is nothing to assess for regulated activity, and the operator is not identified. Real-world identity remains unverified, and the ownership and governance picture is opaque. This is an identity gap rather than an identity contradiction. A broker-reputation lookup returned no match, so no third-party reputational signal exists either way. Technical hosting facts are consistent with an ordinary Netlify deployment, but they do not establish who operates the site or that its content is legitimate. Evidence: - Homepage and site structure: no legal entity, address, licence, or registration number is shown, and no policy pages were captured. - Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is OV-level, issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, and valid to 2027-03-19. It identifies the hosting platform, not the site's operator. - Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US). ### What to Verify Next Because the page is a placeholder, the first step is to establish through an independent route whether any organisation actually claims this address. Anyone who received this link in an email, message, or advertisement should confirm with the claimed sender, using a contact route obtained separately from that message, that the address is genuinely theirs. Official portals for the apparent brand or service should be reached by typing the known address directly. If the link was presented as a login or onboarding portal, the sender's organisation should be told that a lookalike address is in circulation. The domain's reputation status should be rechecked before any later reassessment, because the current listings are the reason for caution. Evidence: - Homepage: the placeholder offers no operator identity to check against, so identity must be confirmed outside the site. - Hostname: its resemblance to the hosting provider's own domain means the claimed origin should be compared against official channels. - Threat listings: the current malicious detections are the benchmark for any later re-check. ### Summary Verdict The available evidence supports a high-risk, clearly cautionary posture. Active third-party malicious detections, a lookalike hostname, and concealed form behaviour that the visible page does not explain outweigh the benign appearance of an empty placeholder. Identity is unverified, and the domain is newly created with almost no history, so nothing offsets these negative signals. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind Amazon Web Services edge infrastructure, with four edge addresses observed and no origin server visible. Its certificate chain is valid and issued by a known authority. This is a mitigating factor only. Edge-only visibility prevents independent confirmation of where the content is hosted and can mask rapid content swaps. Protective hosting and a valid certificate cannot offset the reputation risk from the external detections. ### Closing Assessment The domain should not be used for login, credential entry, or any financial interaction. At most it should be treated as read-only, and ideally it should be avoided entirely, with any link that led here handled as potentially hostile. Users who encountered it through a message or advertisement should report it and navigate to the intended service only by typing its known official address. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 04 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 05 Page content - The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 50% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app. - The request stayed on portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-07. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 | | Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-10-07 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 5 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [crypto-ob4.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-ob4.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-pwy.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-pwy.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-cl3.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-cl3.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-zpt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-zpt.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-knr.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-knr.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-2fy.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-2fy.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 26/100) - [crypto-o0j.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-o0j.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 27/100) - [crypto-ens.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-ens.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [betonlotosovo.ru](https://trustsniffer.com/report/betonlotosovo.ru), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100) - [angloasiahelston.co.uk](https://trustsniffer.com/report/angloasiahelston.co.uk), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites) - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-znr.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*