---
title: "Is pumplivestream.pro Safe? Risk Report, Score 48/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "pumplivestream.pro"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is pumplivestream.pro Safe? Warning Signs, Score 48/100"
trust_score: 48
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/pumplivestream.pro
assessed: 2026-10-25
---

# Is pumplivestream.pro safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 48/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 48/100.** pumplivestream.pro is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Safe for Read-Only

Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | None flagged it (VirusTotal) | Clear |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the pumplivestream.pro homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/pumplivestream.pro/screenshots/first.png)

_What pumplivestream.pro served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Safe for Read-Only.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- VirusTotal and Google Safe Browsing had no flags for this domain; its hosting IP carries AbuseIPDB reports below the confidence level TrustSniffer treats as a flag.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

The site is a very recently launched web property whose homepage is titled "Pump" and sits on a ".pro" domain with a live-streaming theme. It serves a single text-based landing page of moderate length. The available evidence does not establish a clear product, service, or business model beyond what the name implies, so its apparent purpose is a streaming or "pump"-branded online offering of unconfirmed nature.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they drive the cautionary posture of this report. The domain is **currently blacklisted** by external threat intelligence: a major security vendor flags it as a threat, and several additional scanning engines mark it as suspicious. This is decisive because it comes from independent reputation sources rather than from any claim the site makes. Four abuse reports exist for the network address the site resolves to, but that address belongs to a shared cloud-provider pool. Those reports therefore cannot be attributed to the site's operator with confidence and are treated as background context, not as proof of misconduct. No conflicting legal identities, brand impersonation, or phishing-page behaviour were observed. Automated sessions on the homepage showed no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, credential posts to third-party hosts, or content cloaking. The weight of the concern therefore rests on the blacklist signal combined with a domain that has existed for only days, not on a demonstrated malicious mechanism. Ownership opacity also applies, since no real-world operator has been independently linked to the site. That is an accountability limitation, not an identity contradiction.


Evidence:
- Domain registered in October 2026 (~13 days old), with a single web-archive snapshot (first and last seen 2026-10-12, 1 year tracked), so there is effectively no historical track record.
- Homepage: external reputation sources currently list the domain as a threat, with one major vendor flagging it and additional engines marking it suspicious.
- Hosting address: 4 abuse reports on a shared cloud-provider address, classified as shared infrastructure and not specific to this site.
- Behavioral sessions (3 of 3 completed): no wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijack, cloaking, or hidden-form activity detected.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page does not tie the site to an identifiable company, registered business, or financial or media licence, and operator identity remains unverified. Governance and ownership are opaque. Because the site does not state what it sells or offers, no regulated activity can be assessed against a licensing regime. No third-party broker or regulatory profile matched this domain, so there is no external reputational context either way. The valid encryption certificate and mainstream cloud hosting are hygiene factors that any new site can obtain cheaply. They do not substitute for identity or authorisation.


Evidence:
- Served from AS16509 (Amazon, AMAZON-02), US-registered address space.
- TLS certificate issued by YE1 (domain-validated, DV), valid to 2026-12-01. DV validates domain control only, not the organisation behind it.
- Homepage titled "Pump", with no verifiable operator or regulator reference in the captured content.
- No third-party broker profile matched for this domain.

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, the operator should be identified through channels independent of the site. This means checking the domain's registrant through an official registry lookup and searching for the named entity in the relevant corporate and financial-licence registers. Any claimed partnership, product, or token should be confirmed on the counterparty's own official channels and not through links on the site. The flagging vendor's current assessment should be rechecked after a few weeks, since reputation on very new domains often changes quickly as either remediation or further reports occur. Official support or contact routes should be confirmed via an offline or otherwise independent source.


Evidence:
- Homepage was captured successfully on repeated runs, so its claims can be reviewed directly against independent registers.
- Outbound requests during testing went only to recognised destinations, so verification effort belongs on operator identity, not on hidden traffic.
- 19 console errors were recorded across the three sessions, indicating an unpolished or unstable page build.

### Summary Verdict

The site sits in a low-trust, elevated-risk posture. External threat reputation is adverse, and the site is too new and too unverified for that adverse reputation to be offset. Technical hygiene is adequate, but no evidence anchors the site to a legitimate, accountable operator.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Amazon's CDN/WAF layer. All four observed addresses are edge nodes, and the origin server was not observable. This is a mitigating factor only: it indicates ordinary commercial hosting and reduces exposure to some attacks, but it prevents independent verification of the true hosting origin and can mask rapid content swaps. Protective infrastructure does not offset the external reputation risk.


### Closing Assessment

Interaction should be limited to passive, read-only viewing. Account registration, login, credential entry, wallet connection, and any payment or financial transfer should be avoided until the external flags are cleared and the operator is independently identified.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of pumplivestream.pro.

- The request stayed on pumplivestream.pro. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-12. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-01 |
| Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-12 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 0 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about pumplivestream.pro at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [multiprotocoltoken.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/multiprotocoltoken.pro), another .pro site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 38/100)
- [giftsol.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/giftsol.pro), another .pro site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [jup-gate.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/jup-gate.pro), another .pro site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 28/100)
- [governance-firelight.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/governance-firelight.pro), another .pro site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [tge-variational.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tge-variational.pro), another .pro site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [rmbcoin.cc](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rmbcoin.cc), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-sni.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-sni.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-lps.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-lps.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-ob4.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-ob4.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-pwy.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-pwy.netlify.app), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pumplivestream.pro) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/pumplivestream.pro · assessed 2026-10-25.*