--- title: "Is quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is Pages a scam? quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev assessed: 2026-11-01 --- # Is Pages a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment of quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-11-01 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 12 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 1.9 years old (Registered history) | Clear | | Web archive | Archived since 2024 (6 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-11-01. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2024. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This website is a Cloudflare Pages-hosted subdomain whose name suggests a node or module service from a "quantum fusion" project. It presents no readable business content to a visitor. The captured homepage was a short Cloudflare interstitial titled as a suspected misleading website, not a product, service or company page. Its apparent purpose and business model could not be established from the page itself, and the platform-subdomain naming carries no independent brand identity. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present and material. Several tier-one security vendors currently flag the site as malicious, a double-digit count of engines in aggregate, and this is a **confirmed blacklist condition** that independently caps the assessment at the lowest band. The sandbox also showed unusually heavy outbound traffic. Almost all observed requests went to third-party hosts, 127 background requests and 6 outbound POSTs in total, and the browser console logged a high volume of errors. These patterns are consistent with a script-heavy or poorly maintained deployment. They do not by themselves show data exfiltration. All outbound destinations fell within recognised, whitelisted services. The sandbox saw no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, cloaking or fingerprinting. No conflicting legal identities and no explicit brand impersonation were observed, so the elevated risk rests on the external threat detections and the young, thinly documented domain, not on identity conflict. Evidence: - Homepage: multiple tier-one security vendors, including a dozen engines in aggregate, classify the domain as malicious, with one further engine marking it suspicious. - Domain registration: about 1.9 years old, first observed in the web archive on 2024-12-20. - Web-archive depth: 6 snapshots across 2024–2026 (3 calendar years tracked), a sparse and shallow public history. - Homepage behaviour: 18 console errors across 3 successful sandbox runs, with up to 96.1% of requests going to external hosts. ### Regulatory Verification Notes No licence, registration number, legal-entity name or regulator reference could be tied to this site, and its identity has not been independently connected to any real-world brand or person. The operator is therefore opaque, with both ownership and governance opacity present. This is an administrative limitation, not an identity contradiction. The site offers nothing to anchor a regulated or institutional claim. A broker-reputation lookup returned no match, which is neutral and neither supports nor undermines the site. The valid transport encryption reflects only basic domain-control validation. It says nothing about who operates the site. Evidence: - Site transport encryption: certificate issued by WE1, domain-validated (DV) only, valid to 2026-12-31 (59 days remaining). - Hosting infrastructure: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - Homepage and legal pages: no company name, licence or registration disclosure available to assess. ### What to Verify Next Before any engagement, confirm through an independent route that a real organisation operates this service and that it actually owns this hostname. Check its official channels through an offline route or an established directory, and do not rely on links reached via this domain. If the service claims to handle funds or digital assets, check the claimed operator against the relevant financial or securities registry. Confirm that the project's official domain is not a different, established address, since a Pages-hosted subdomain with no independent branding is easy to spin up and abandon. Re-test the site only after the threat detections are cleared by the flagging vendors. Evidence: - Homepage: the captured page was a Cloudflare warning interstitial, not business content, so no products or claims could be confirmed. - Site behaviour: no wallet-connection, clipboard or hidden-form activity was observed during testing, so no transaction flow has been characterised. ### Summary Verdict The available evidence places this website in the lowest trust band with a clearly cautionary posture. Active security-vendor detections are decisive, and the young, minimally documented domain with no verifiable operator gives nothing to offset them. Basic technical hygiene is present but does not establish legitimacy. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all four observed addresses are edge nodes in Cloudflare's US network, so the origin server is not visible. Trusted-CDN hosting and consistent DNS data mitigate infrastructure-level concern. They do not offset the reputation findings, and edge-only visibility prevents independent hosting verification. ### Closing Assessment The site should be limited to passive, read-only viewing at most, ideally from an isolated environment. Account creation, credential entry, wallet connection, downloads and any payment should be avoided until the external detections are lifted and the operator is independently identified. _Written analysis generated 2026-11-01 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`) - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`) - The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY`) ### 03 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev. - The request stayed on quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-12-20. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2cf5 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-31 | | Domain age | 1.86 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2024-12-20 | | Archive snapshots | 6 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 12 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/igh4ughplwplpbpcryzyv4rg3-8g347934.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 15/100) - [5202515772.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/5202515772.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 3/100) - [owlto-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/owlto-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [worldlibertyfinanceal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/worldlibertyfinanceal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [hubble-3nh.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hubble-3nh.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [vote-bsquared.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vote-bsquared.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [protocolresync.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/protocolresync.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [register-bunnie-sol-xyz.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/register-bunnie-sol-xyz.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [bncb.club](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bncb.club), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 4/100) - [fishingfrenzy.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fishingfrenzy.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27) - [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites) - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/quantumfusion-mod-nodes.pages.dev · assessed 2026-11-01.*