---
title: "Is rentenergy.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "rentenergy.vercel.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is rentenergy.vercel.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/rentenergy.vercel.app
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is rentenergy.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** rentenergy.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 10 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 90 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 6 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (5 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the rentenergy.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/rentenergy.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What rentenergy.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

RentEnergy is a single-page promotional website, served as a subdomain of a public application-hosting platform. It markets an "instant TRON energy delegation" service and claims users can "save 78% on TRC-20 fees". It presents itself as an intermediary that supplies network resources to cryptocurrency users who want to cut TRON transaction costs. Its apparent business model is a paid, crypto-denominated resource-rental service.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

This site carries a **confirmed adverse reputation**. Multiple independent security engines classify it as malicious or suspicious, and it has been placed on external blacklists. That is the decisive finding in this report, and the platform's own protections do not offset it. No conflicting legal identities and no brand impersonation were observed. The site's reputation problem therefore does not stem from an identity conflict. The risk lies in the combination of a very new web presence, a consistent malicious classification, and a financial proposition that cannot be independently validated. The homepage's headline promise of a 78% fee saving is an unverifiable marketing claim. A service in this category normally asks the visitor to send cryptocurrency or share a wallet address, so any inaccuracy in the claim would translate directly into irreversible financial loss. Automated browsing of the homepage found no wallet-drainer behavior, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or cloaking, and no external data submissions. These clean behavioral results do not outweigh the external detections. Content can be swapped after a clean capture, and the site's own page content could not be analysed in depth. Evidence:

- Homepage: the title advertises instant TRON energy delegation and a 78% saving on TRC-20 fees. No substantiation was found for the saving.
- Reputation checks: 10 malicious and 2 suspicious verdicts from the multi-engine reputation check, with two tier-one security vendors among the flaggers. This triggered the blacklist-level cap.
- Domain provenance: first registered in 2026 (~0.47 years old).
- Web archive: only 5 snapshots, spanning May–July 2026 (about 1 year tracked), so the site has no established history.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The homepage and the pages captured offered no clear corporate name, registration number, licensing statement, or accountable operator, so the site's real-world identity remains unestablished. Because the site is hosted as a subdomain of a shared application platform, the domain registration reflects the platform provider and says nothing about who operates the service. The site also gives no regulatory or consumer-protection information that would allow a payment-handling intermediary to be vetted. This is a verification gap and is not by itself evidence of wrongdoing. Here, however, it compounds the confirmed reputation problem. No third-party broker or regulator listing was matched for the site, which means no independent reputational support exists for it. Evidence:

- Homepage and available site pages: no named legal entity, address, or licence reference was identified.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate was issued by WR1 at DV level, valid to 2026-11-27. DV confirms only control of the domain and says nothing about the operator.

### What to Verify Next

Any contact with this service should begin with independent confirmation of who runs it. That means looking for the operator's identity through the official channels of the TRON ecosystem or a reputable community source, and not through links or contact details on the site itself. The 78% saving claim should be tested against the publicly visible cost of TRON energy and the resource-rental pricing of established providers. Finally, a fresh reputation re-check should be made before any future reconsideration, because current listings may change if the operator remediates. For completeness, any registration or licence claim the operator later makes should be confirmed directly with the relevant registry, and not via the site. Evidence:

- Homepage: the 78% fee-saving claim is the central assertion to test against independent pricing.
- Security engines: the current detections would need to clear before the site is reassessed.
- Web archive: only a short, sparse record exists, so past behavior offers no independent baseline.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is **high risk**. Confirmed adverse reputation findings from independent security sources decide the outcome, and the site's recent origin and unestablished operator leave nothing that could balance them. Passing behavioral checks and a valid certificate show that no active attack was caught in the captured sessions. They are not grounds for trust.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind a mainstream, well-regarded CDN and hosting platform, and the edge addresses observed all resolve to the same large provider. This protection is a mitigating factor only. It does not establish the site's legitimacy, and it prevents independent confirmation of where the content originates. It would also allow content to be swapped quickly. A large number of abuse reports are attached to the shared platform address. They were discounted because they apply to a shared provider address and not to this site specifically, so they do not add to the adverse finding. The external blacklist and malicious detections remain the controlling factor.


### Closing Assessment

Interaction should be limited to passive viewing. No account login, credential entry, wallet connection, or payment should take place. Anyone who has already interacted with the site should review the affected wallet's approvals and revoke any permissions granted. Any funds sent should be traced, and further transfers should be avoided.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)

### 04 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered between three and six months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_YOUNG_6M`)

### 05 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 90 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.67 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of rentenergy.vercel.app.

- The request stayed on rentenergy.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-05-09. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.29.17.67 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 6 |
| Edge IP addresses | 6 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | 0.47 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-05-09 |
| Archive snapshots | 5 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 10 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 90 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about rentenergy.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [amlscan-trc20.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/amlscan-trc20.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [beastsite.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/beastsite.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 14/100)
- [programmable-v4.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/programmable-v4.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [upgraded-eth.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/upgraded-eth.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [hyperliquid-season2.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hyperliquid-season2.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [trustwalletindia-beta.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trustwalletindia-beta.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [openseaio102.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/openseaio102.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [trustifybep.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trustifybep.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [metacene.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/metacene.top), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 20/100)
- [itrustcapitaltaxreform.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/itrustcapitaltaxreform.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rentenergy.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/rentenergy.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-27.*