--- title: "Is robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app a Scam? Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app assessed: 2026-10-21 --- # Is robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | Netlify default 404 'Site not found' error page. No deployed site content, product, service, login form, or business information is present. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 7 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 22 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (3 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png) _What robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. The hostname is a subdomain on a shared static-site hosting platform. Its name combines a well-known retail brokerage brand with "main", "dex" and "lrt", which suggests a decentralized-exchange or token front end. A visitor to the homepage sees only the hosting provider's stock "Site not found" error page. The page says the link is broken or the address does not exist on the platform, and it carries a platform support reference and a "Start building" prompt. No product, service, contact details, login form or business content is deployed, so no business model is visible. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present and are decisive. Several independent threat-intelligence engines flag the hostname as malicious, including a tier-one security vendor, and the site is **blacklisted** on the strength of those external detections. The error page itself discloses nothing, so the risk comes from the hostname and the sandbox behaviour. The hostname borrows a recognizable brokerage brand and pairs it with crypto-exchange vocabulary, a pattern commonly used to stage lookalike trading or wallet-connection pages. The analysis did not confirm brand impersonation, and no phishing content was captured. A hostname built this way, with detections already accumulated, is consistent with infrastructure staged for a lookalike front end that was removed, not yet published, or serving content only under certain conditions. The visible page and the sandbox behaviour also disagree. The page displays no forms, yet in every sandbox run the page contained hidden forms, including password-type fields. The page layout also changed heavily after interaction, far beyond what a static error screen would produce. That mismatch is a material warning sign. No conflicting legal identities were observed, because no identity content exists to conflict. Evidence: - Homepage: a stock hosting-provider "Site not found" screen with no visible forms, products or business information. - Sandbox runs of the homepage: hidden forms and password fields detected in all three runs, with a very large number of page-structure changes after interaction. - Reputation checks: 7 engines classed the hostname as malicious, including one tier-one vendor, and an external blacklist hit was confirmed. - Domain provenance: the hostname has about 23 days of observed history, and its web-archive record is 3 snapshots, all in 2026 (first captured 2026-09-27, one year tracked). ### Regulatory Verification Notes No licence, registration number, operator name, legal terms or privacy policy appears anywhere on the site, because no content has been deployed beyond the error page. Operator identity could not be independently connected to any real-world person or brand, and ownership is opaque. This is a verification gap, not proof of wrongdoing, but it removes every on-site means of confirming who runs the property. No third-party broker or regulatory-database record was matched. The absence of any such record is not a regulatory verdict. The site makes no claim of being regulated or licensed, so none of its claims can be tested. Evidence: - Homepage: contains no company name, licence, jurisdiction or legal text. - Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is organization-validated (OV), issued to the hosting platform by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 and valid to 2027-03-19. It identifies the hosting provider, not the operator of this hostname. - Identity checks: no registry or brand-ownership signal connects the hostname to any real-world entity. ### What to Verify Next The brokerage brand and any exchange the hostname implies should be confirmed only through channels that do not touch this hostname. Examples are the brand's official website typed in by hand, or its official app. Any message, advertisement or social-media post that supplied this address should be treated as unverified and traced to its sender. If a trading, staking or wallet-connection interface later appears on this hostname, it should be assumed to be an unauthorized lookalike. Reported through the brand's official abuse channel, the address would help the brand and the hosting platform assess it. Internal security teams should add the hostname to monitoring and block lists, and should re-scan it if its content changes. Evidence: - Homepage: no published contact channel, official-brand reference or support route exists to cross-check. - Hostname: the brand-plus-exchange naming is the only identity cue, and it is unverified. - Sandbox behaviour: the hidden password-type forms are what a later re-scan should look for first. ### Summary Verdict The assessment is critical and clearly cautionary. Confirmed external threat detections, hidden-form behaviour inconsistent with the visible page, and a very young, thinly documented hostname outweigh the technically sound platform it runs on. The site's real-world operator remains unidentified, so its legitimacy is not established and its risk is elevated. ### Infrastructure Integrity The hostname resolves to Amazon-hosted edge infrastructure (AS16509, Amazon.com, Inc., US) behind the hosting platform's CDN/WAF layer. All four observed addresses are edge nodes, and the origin server was not observable. This is a mitigating factor only, since protective infrastructure does not establish legitimacy and cannot offset the reputation findings. Four abuse reports exist against one of the shared edge addresses, but they are attributed to shared provider infrastructure and say little about this specific site. Because the content sits behind a shared edge, it can be replaced quickly without any visible change to the underlying addresses. ### Closing Assessment The hostname should be treated as unsafe for any login, credential entry, wallet connection or financial activity. Viewing it passively adds no value, and no files should be downloaded from it. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 04 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 05 Page content - The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 50% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app. - The request stayed on robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-27. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 | | Domain age | 0.06 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-09-27 | | Archive snapshots | 3 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 7 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [portal-moonshot-74u.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-74u.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [portal-moonshot-qlv.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-qlv.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [okxclaim-holdearntokenrewards.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/okxclaim-holdearntokenrewards.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-vdl.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-vdl.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 2/100) - [portal-moonshot-0yf.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-0yf.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-uff.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-uff.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 1/100) - [crypto-a0y.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-a0y.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-scx.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-scx.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [realansemonsol.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/realansemonsol.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [xrillaz.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xrillaz.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24) - [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer) - [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-21.*