--- title: "Is ronin-devrpc.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 5/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "ronin-devrpc.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is ronin-devrpc.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100" trust_score: 5 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/ronin-devrpc.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-27 --- # Is ronin-devrpc.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** ronin-devrpc.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 12 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 2.1 years old (Registered history) | Clear | | Web archive | Archived since 2024 (7 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the ronin-devrpc.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/ronin-devrpc.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What ronin-devrpc.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2024. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This website is a free-tier subdomain on a public static-hosting platform. Its name reads like developer RPC (remote procedure call) endpoint branding for a blockchain network. When analysed, the page presented only a short access-denial interstitial from the content-delivery layer, titled as a suspected-phishing notice, instead of any product, company or service content. Its apparent purpose therefore cannot be established from what the site shows. The naming pattern is one commonly used to lure blockchain developers and wallet users toward counterfeit infrastructure endpoints. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present and decisive. Multiple major security vendors currently flag the site as malicious, and it is **blacklisted** by external reputation sources. The homepage that the analysis received was an interception page carrying a phishing warning, and the site's historical record is associated with known phishing activity. No conflicting legal identities were found, and no specific brand impersonation was confirmed. However, the hostname evokes a well-known blockchain network's developer tooling, and it sits on a shared hosting namespace where anyone can publish content at no cost and with no identity checks. That combination is the typical shape of a lure aimed at developers or wallet holders. Behavioural testing in a sandbox found no wallet-drainer routines, clipboard tampering, hidden forms or credential posts to unrecognised external hosts. That is a mitigating observation, but it does not offset the detections. The page also generated a high volume of console errors and routed most of its network traffic to external hosts, which fits a thin or staged page rather than a maintained service. Content can be swapped quickly on this kind of hosting, so a clean sandbox run today does not guarantee the page behaves the same way tomorrow. Evidence: - Homepage: capture returned a bot-challenge interstitial (HTTP 403) titled as a suspected-phishing notice, with no site content visible. - Domain provenance: domain age ~2.2 years; 7 archive snapshots spanning 2024–2025 (2 years tracked), a short and sparse history for a site presenting itself as infrastructure. - Reputation: 12 malicious and 2 suspicious verdicts from the scanning vendors, including three top-tier security vendors; no Google Safe Browsing hit. - Behaviour: 20 external XHR/fetch calls and 4 external POSTs, none to non-whitelisted hosts; 16 console errors; no wallet-connect, drainer or clipboard-write activity. ### Regulatory Verification Notes No licensing, registration or legal-entity information could be assessed. The only content obtained was the interception page, so no terms, privacy policy, about page or contact page was available to review. The site is not matched in the broker-reputation dataset and no third-party regulator source links it to a regulated entity. Neither point is a finding by itself. This section therefore rests on the reputational evidence above, not on any disclosure gap. Real-world operator identity remains unconfirmed, and nothing on the site supports a claim of association with any blockchain project or financial institution. Evidence: - Homepage: no legal, licensing or ownership disclosures were visible because only the interstitial was returned. - Hosting telemetry: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - Transport security: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2027-01-04. This confirms encryption only and says nothing about operator identity. ### What to Verify Next Any developer, wallet or integration that references this endpoint should confirm the project's official RPC and documentation addresses through an independent route, such as the project's verified documentation or official social accounts reached by manual navigation. A link, message or configuration entry that points to this hostname is not a valid source. Anyone who has already connected a wallet, signed a transaction or entered a seed phrase, private key or API key on this site should treat those secrets as exposed. They should rotate keys and move funds. If the site belongs to a legitimate owner, the next step is to audit the deployment for unauthorised changes and request re-evaluation from the reputation providers once cleaned. Official support or contact channels should be confirmed independently before any engagement. Evidence: - Homepage: the interstitial's suspected-phishing title and the active vendor detections support treating any prior interaction as potentially compromised. - Behavioural test: no wallet or credential-capture routines were seen in the sandbox, but the page's content could change without notice. - Hosting model: the shared public-hosting namespace means content ownership cannot be inferred from the address alone. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high risk. Active malicious-site detections from several independent security sources override the technically valid encryption and the short but continuous history. The site is not suitable for any sensitive interaction, and the evidence supports a clearly cautionary classification. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is delivered through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF. All four observed addresses are edge nodes, and the true origin server could not be observed. The certificate chain is valid and the network records are internally consistent. This is a mitigating factor only. Because the origin cannot be independently inspected, hosting cannot be verified and content can be replaced quickly. Protective infrastructure is not evidence of legitimacy and does not offset the reputation findings. ### Closing Assessment Treat the site as unsafe for any login, credential entry, wallet connection, signing or payment. At most, access it passively and without interaction, preferably from an isolated environment. Anyone who has already interacted with it should act on the key-rotation and fund-protection steps above without delay. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 Governance - A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`) ### 02 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`) - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`) ### 04 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of ronin-devrpc.pages.dev. - The request stayed on ronin-devrpc.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-08-30. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2c4b | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-01-04 | | Domain age | 2.15 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2024-08-30 | | Archive snapshots | 7 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 12 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about ronin-devrpc.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [p1inch.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/p1inch.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [zeta-x.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/zeta-x.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [flying-fse.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flying-fse.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [scorpioncasino-portal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/scorpioncasino-portal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 2/100) - [smart-connect-mainnet.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/smart-connect-mainnet.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [dappsolana.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dappsolana.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [smartwebdevfix3.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/smartwebdevfix3.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [uni-swap-live.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/uni-swap-live.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [invariant-exchange.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/invariant-exchange.net), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [hyperfoundationholders.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hyperfoundationholders.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ronin-devrpc.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/ronin-devrpc.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*