---
title: "Is sammygeemints082.github.io a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "sammygeemints082.github.io"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is sammygeemints082.github.io a Scam? Trust Review, 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/sammygeemints082.github.io
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is sammygeemints082.github.io a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** sammygeemints082.github.io shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 6 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 11% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 9 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YR1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | FASTLY (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the sammygeemints082.github.io homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/sammygeemints082.github.io/screenshots/first.png)

_What sammygeemints082.github.io served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a user-level subdomain on a public code-hosting and static-site platform. When captured, its homepage returned a "Site not found" notice rather than any product, service, or business content. It presents no brand, offer, or storefront to a visitor, and no business model is evident. Its apparent function is a placeholder or abandoned project page, and it was assessed on its reputation and behaviour instead.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they drive a clearly cautionary assessment. Several independent security engines currently flag the domain as malicious, and two of them are top-tier vendors. This amounts to a confirmed **blacklist** listing, and it is the decisive factor in the assessment. The page content itself provided no usable evidence of the operator's identity, so no claim about who runs the site can be supported. The page is empty, so the detections cannot be tied to any visible lure, form, or product. The remaining risk therefore rests on external reputation and observed behaviour. During sandbox runs, the page produced outbound POST requests, including some to destinations outside the platform's expected services, and most of its network activity went to third-party hosts. For a page that displays only an error notice, that outbound pattern is out of proportion to its content. Abuse reports exist against the shared platform address it resolves to, but they apply to infrastructure used by many unrelated sites and are not evidence about this operator. No conflicting legal identities, brand impersonation, or wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijack, or credential-form behaviour was observed. Evidence:

- Homepage: the page title and body present a "site not found" notice, and the page returned a not-found status when captured.
- Reputation: 6 security engines rated the domain malicious and 1 suspicious, including two top-tier vendors.
- Behaviour: 3 of 6 outbound POST requests went to non-allow-listed destinations, and about 99% of the peak network activity was external.
- Shared address: 9 abuse reports exist against the shared platform IP, attributed to shared infrastructure rather than this site specifically.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site publishes no legal, terms, privacy, or about pages, and nothing on the captured page names an operating entity, a licence, or a registration. Given the absence of any commercial offering, this is a content gap and not a finding of regulatory breach. Identity could not be independently connected to a real-world person or organisation. Legitimacy therefore cannot be established, and the technical hygiene below does not change that. Transport security is correctly configured, but a basic domain-validated certificate says nothing about who operates the site. No third-party broker or regulator profile matched this domain. Evidence:

- Homepage: no company name, licence number, or legal-entity reference appears on the captured page.
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is DV, issued by YR1, valid to 2026-12-29.
- Hosting network: served from AS54113 (Fastly, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Any contact with this domain should first be matched to a known, independently confirmed party. If someone supplied this address, the sender's identity and intent should be confirmed through an offline or previously trusted channel before any interaction. The detections should be re-checked on the current reputation sources, since a compromised page can be cleaned and delisted. Content downloaded from this domain should be treated as untrusted until then. Whoever owns the project can be asked to confirm whether the page is intentionally empty or has been tampered with. Evidence:

- Homepage: the empty "site not found" state gives no legitimate content to validate against any claimed offering.
- Reputation: the current malicious flags from multiple security engines are the primary item to re-check.
- Behaviour: outbound POST activity to non-allow-listed hosts should be re-tested for persistence.

### Summary Verdict

The assessment is critical and clearly cautionary. Confirmed external threat detections on an otherwise contentless page, together with unexplained outbound data transmission, outweigh the site's sound transport-layer hygiene. The identity of the operator is unknown, and available evidence does not support treating the domain as legitimate.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The domain resolves entirely to Fastly edge servers on a trusted content-delivery network, which is the platform's standard front end. The origin server was not observable, so only the edge layer could be assessed. This protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only. It does not offset the external threat detections, and the layer can obscure rapid content changes behind the edge.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for logins, credential entry, or any payment or financial interaction. Any visit should be limited to passive viewing, from an isolated or disposable environment. Nothing should be downloaded from it until the threat listings are cleared and the operator is independently confirmed.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`)
- The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 9 reports on hosting IP 2606:50c0:8002::153 (GitHub, Inc., Content Delivery Network), 11% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of sammygeemints082.github.io.

- The request stayed on sammygeemints082.github.io. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on FASTLY, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | FASTLY - Fastly, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:50c0:8002::153 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (fastly) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 8 |
| Edge IP addresses | 8 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-29 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 6 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 11% confidence, 9 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about sammygeemints082.github.io at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [everstake-page.github.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/everstake-page.github.io), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [flashsd.github.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flashsd.github.io), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [donutsmp-mod.github.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/donutsmp-mod.github.io), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [rocket-pool-site.github.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rocket-pool-site.github.io), a similar name (Moderate Trust, 58/100)
- [github.blog](https://trustsniffer.com/report/github.blog), same name on .blog (High Trust, 94/100)
- [github.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/github.com), same name on .com (High Trust, 100/100)
- [bifrostdesktopapps.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bifrostdesktopapps.io), another .io site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [pistacio.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pistacio.io), another .io site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [photontrade.lol](https://trustsniffer.com/report/photontrade.lol), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-gc5.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-gc5.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sammygeemints082.github.io) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/sammygeemints082.github.io · assessed 2026-10-22.*