--- title: "Is seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 46/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app" verdict: "Low Trust" title: "Is seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app Safe? Trust Review, 46/100" trust_score: 46 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app assessed: 2026-10-26 --- # Is seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 46/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 46/100.** seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app is low-trust and potentially risky. Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 93 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted | | Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png) _What seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview Seedify Fund is a single-page website served from a free Vercel-hosted subdomain whose name combines "seedify", "fund" and "burn". It presents itself under the title "Seedify Fund" and appears to be a crypto-asset fundraising or token-burn event page. Its apparent purpose is to draw visitors into a token-related interaction under a name that resembles an established crypto launchpad brand. Nothing independent connects the site to that brand. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This is the decisive area of the assessment. An external reputation source currently lists the site as malicious, which is a **confirmed blacklist hit** and the principal reason for the cautionary posture. The hostname borrows a recognisable crypto-brand name and pairs it with "fund" and "burn", wording typical of token-event lures. It sits on a generic free-hosting subdomain rather than a brand-controlled domain. No independent evidence ties the page to the brand it evokes. Conflicting legal identities were not found, and impersonation was not directly confirmed. The reputation listing and the brand-style naming together are enough to treat the page as high-risk for any sensitive interaction. A large volume of abuse reports exists for one of the site's edge addresses. These apply to the shared hosting provider's address pool and are discounted as not attributable to this site. They are not counted against it. In automated browsing, the site showed no wallet-connection prompts, wallet-draining behaviour, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, credential posts to external destinations, or content cloaking. External requests went only to recognised destinations. The page did generate a notable number of console errors. This absence of active malicious behaviour in the captured sessions does not offset the reputation listing, because such pages can change after capture. Evidence: - Homepage and hostname: the title "Seedify Fund" and the "fund-burn" hostname on a free-hosting subdomain create brand-style naming with no verifiable link to a brand. - External reputation: one major threat-intelligence engine rated the site malicious and another suspicious, and an aggregated blacklist flag is set. - Hosting-address abuse reports: 93 reports against edge address 216.198.79.131, attributed to Vercel's shared content-delivery pool and discounted. - Browser sessions: three successful runs recorded 13 external data requests and 4 external posts, all to recognised destinations, with 21 console errors and no wallet, clipboard, or cloaking activity. ### Regulatory Verification Notes No regulatory registration, licence, or authorised-entity status is evidenced for this site, and the on-page disclosure position is unclear. Operator and governance details are opaque. No legal-entity name, terms-of-service owner, or accountable contact could be established from the captured page. Page analysis could not independently connect the site to any real-world brand or person, so its apparent identity rests on naming alone. This is a verification gap and not proof of wrongdoing, but the reputation listing means no leniency can be extended on it. No third-party broker or reputational dataset matched the site. The transport layer is basic: a domain-validated certificate confirms only that the connection is encrypted, not who operates the site. Evidence: - Hosting: the site is served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US), registry ARIN, country US. - Transport security: the TLS certificate is issued by WR1 at domain-validation (DV) level and is valid to 2026-11-27 (32 days remaining). - Homepage: the captured page offers no stated company name, licence number, or registration reference. - Broker datasets: no match was found in the third-party broker reputation dataset. ### What to Verify Next Do not rely on the site's own claims. Check the project's official channels through an independent route, such as the verified social accounts and official domain listed by the genuine brand the name evokes, and confirm whether any "fund" or "burn" event is announced there. Confirm independently whether the operator holds any relevant authorisation with the relevant financial or securities authority in its stated jurisdiction. Before any interaction, re-check the site's current reputation status and confirm the official contact channels through an independent, offline route. Evidence: - Hostname: the free-hosting subdomain is not a brand-controlled domain, so the brand's own published domain list is the reference point. - Homepage: no operator identity is presented, so no registry lookup can be keyed to a named entity until one is established elsewhere. - Reputation status: the current listing means the site's standing should be re-checked at the time of any intended use. ### Summary Verdict The site is rated low-trust with elevated risk. A confirmed external threat listing, brand-style naming without a verifiable link to any real brand, and an unidentified operator converge on a clearly cautionary posture. Passive, read-only viewing is the only use consistent with the evidence. Login, credential entry, and financial interaction are unsafe uses. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site resolves to Amazon-hosted infrastructure behind Vercel's content-delivery edge, where all observed addresses are shared edge servers and no origin server was observable. Independent verification of where the content is actually hosted is therefore not possible. This standard protective layer is a mitigating factor only. It cannot offset the external reputation risk and says nothing about the operator's legitimacy. ### Closing Assessment Treat the site as unsafe for any login, wallet interaction, credential entry, or payment, and limit any contact to passive viewing. Anyone who has already interacted with it should secure the affected accounts and wallets. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, registration and ownership, behaviour in a sandbox. ### 01 External reputation - A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`) ### 02 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`) - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 93 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.131 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app. - The request stayed on seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 216.198.79.131 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected | | Resolved IP addresses | 8 | | Edge IP addresses | 8 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WR1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 | | Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 93 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [aave-v2.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aave-v2.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 27/100) - [aster-exchange.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aster-exchange.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 29/100) - [fluxbeam-solana.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fluxbeam-solana.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 29/100) - [blasterswaps.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blasterswaps.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 29/100) - [base-bridge-site.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/base-bridge-site.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 40/100) - [stakestone-stake.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stakestone-stake.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 29/100) - [fluxbeam-dex.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fluxbeam-dex.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 29/100) - [frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 31/100) - [fomochart.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fomochart.fun), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100) - [hashcatnft.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hashcatnft.xyz), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 27/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-26.*