--- title: "Is sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Review, 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 64 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app assessed: 2026-10-19 --- # Is sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-19 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 64%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | The page displays only a 'Deployment Unavailable' notice with a request identifier and no other content, so the site's purpose cannot be determined. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 15 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 86 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png) _What sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-19. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This site is a subdomain on a public application-hosting platform. Its hostname refers to sending USDT and BNB on the BNB Smart Chain. When visited, it shows only a "Deployment Unavailable" notice with a request identifier, and no navigation, products, forms, pricing or stated business model. Its purpose cannot be determined from the page, and the hostname is the only indication of an intended use. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present, and this is the decisive part of the assessment. The domain is **blacklisted**: a substantial cluster of security engines, including several tier-one vendors, classify it as malicious, and a separate external blacklist confirms the listing. The detection volume is high enough to trigger an automatic ceiling on trust that infrastructure quality cannot offset. The hostname describes a stablecoin and native-token transfer flow, which is the pattern commonly used to lure visitors into sending funds or approving wallet transactions. This is an inference from the name and the detections, because the captured page contains no transfer interface. A brand-similarity indicator also links the page to the hosting platform's own unavailability notice. It is not a confirmed impersonation, and no conflicting legal identities were found. A large volume of abuse reports exists against the serving IP address. Those reports are discounted because the address belongs to a shared platform pool serving many unrelated tenants, so they are not attributed to this site. The blacklist and malicious-engine detections stand independently of that discounted signal. The page ran three behavioral sandbox sessions with no external network calls, hidden forms, cloaking, wallet-connection attempts or clipboard manipulation. That shows the captured state is inert. It does not show the deployment is benign, because content can change once a deployment is restored. Evidence: - Homepage: a bare "Deployment Unavailable" notice with a request identifier, a platform response consistent with a disabled or blocked deployment (the capture returned an HTTP 451 status). - Domain provenance: roughly 15 days of observed registration continuity (~0.04 years), with a single web-archive snapshot dated 2026-10-03 (1 year tracked). - Hostname: references BSC, USDT and BNB, a fund-transfer lure pattern, while the page itself shows no transfer functionality. - Behavioral sandbox: three successful runs with zero external requests and no wallet or form activity. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The only page available contains no legal, corporate, licensing or contact content, so no operator, registered entity or regulator is named anywhere on the site. Real-world identity is unverified, and ownership and governance opacity are present. This is a limitation of the content, not by itself evidence of fraud. The site does not claim a license, so there is nothing to validate. The business is not presenting itself as regulated, and no third-party broker-reputation entry matches it. The only supporting technical facts are a valid but low-assurance transport certificate and mainstream hosting. Neither establishes who operates the site. Evidence: - Homepage: no company name, registration number, license claim, terms or privacy page, and no contact channel. - Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US). - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-11-27 with 39 days remaining. - Broker-reputation dataset: no match for this domain. ### What to Verify Next Verification should focus on whether the owner is a victim or an actor, and on the origin of any link that led to this address. Anyone who received this address in a message, advertisement or social post should trace that source and treat it as suspect until proven otherwise. An organization expecting a legitimate transfer or payment service should obtain the official domain from the provider through an independent, offline route and compare it character by character against this hostname. Security teams should check blocklists, proxy logs and email gateways for traffic to the domain. They should also re-scan it periodically, because a restored deployment could serve very different content from the current error page. A legitimate operator would need to publish a verifiable legal entity and, if offering financial services, licensing details that can be confirmed with the relevant registry. Evidence: - Homepage: no operator, licensing or contact details exist to check, so any identity claim must come from outside the site. - Threat-intelligence listings: the domain is currently flagged by multiple independent sources, so any past or future outbound link should be treated as untrusted. - Archive history: only a single capture exists, so there is no earlier benign content to compare against. ### Summary Verdict The site is classified at the lowest trust tier, with a cautionary, security-forward posture. Confirmed malicious detections and an external blacklist listing outweigh every mitigating technical signal. The page is currently an empty error shell, so the listing, not any visible content, drives the verdict. The operator remains unidentified and the domain is very new. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site runs on Amazon-operated infrastructure behind a recognized CDN/WAF platform, with all observed addresses being edge servers and a valid certificate in place. The origin server was not observable. These are mitigating factors only and say nothing about the operator's legitimacy. Edge-only visibility prevents independent hosting verification and allows content to be swapped rapidly behind the same address, which matters for a domain already carrying malicious detections. The shared nature of the platform's address pool also means the address's reputation is not specific to this tenant. ### Closing Assessment The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection, token approval or any transfer of funds. Interaction should be limited to passive observation from a controlled environment. Links pointing to this address should be blocked or reported to the hosting platform and the sender's channel. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 03 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 04 Page content - The page has very little readable content. (Page content `rule:PAGE_CONTENT_THIN`) - The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`) - The browser raised a warning while loading the page. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BROWSER_FLAGS_SUSPICIOUS`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 86 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.195 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 50% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app. - The request stayed on sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-03. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 64.29.17.195 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected | | Resolved IP addresses | 6 | | Edge IP addresses | 6 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WR1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 | | Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-10-03 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 15 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 86 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [v2-paraswap.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/v2-paraswap.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [sendusdt-2.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sendusdt-2.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [arcadepadapp.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/arcadepadapp.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 16/100) - [send-usdt-1-chi.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-usdt-1-chi.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [mmmm-lilac.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mmmm-lilac.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [getblockaml.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/getblockaml.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [aml-wallet-scanner.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aml-wallet-scanner.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [trustwallet-secure-check.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trustwallet-secure-check.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [bobothebear.sbs](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bobothebear.sbs), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [appzerion.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/appzerion.io), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23) - [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/sendbscusdtbnb.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-19.*