--- title: "Is shill-sol.com a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "shill-sol.com" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is shill-sol.com a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/shill-sol.com assessed: 2026-10-27 --- # Is shill-sol.com a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** shill-sol.com shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 13 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 266 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 3 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YR1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the shill-sol.com homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/shill-sol.com/screenshots/first.png) _What shill-sol.com served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. The domain shill-sol.com is a very recently registered website whose captured homepage is a minimal page titled "Security Check", with only a few sentences of visible text. It shows no product, service description, company identity or navigation. Its apparent function is that of a gating or interstitial page, and its real purpose cannot be established from the visible content. Observed behaviour after interaction shows the page does something quite different from what it first displays. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present and are the decisive factor in this assessment. The domain is **currently blacklisted**: multiple major security vendors, including three tier-one vendors, classify it as malicious, and the volume of detections is high enough to constitute a confirmed external listing. Behavioural testing adds corroboration. After simulated interaction, the page content and its visual rendering changed almost completely from the initial state. This is strong cloaking, meaning the site shows different material depending on how it is engaged. This is a pattern characteristic of deceptive landing pages and is not consistent with an ordinary brochure site. The page also issued several data submissions to external destinations outside the commonly recognised, whitelisted service set, and it generated a heavy volume of script errors. The generic "Security Check" framing combined with a domain name that evokes crypto-token promotion fits a lure pattern, though the captured page does not itself confirm what the lure leads to. No conflicting legal entities were observed, and no explicit brand impersonation or wallet-connection attempt was captured in the sandbox runs. These absences do not offset the blacklisting and cloaking. Evidence: - Homepage: security vendors, including three tier-one vendors, flag the domain as malicious, and this listing is confirmed externally. - Homepage behaviour: after interaction, its content changed to a very large degree from the initial render, which is a strong cloaking indicator. - Homepage network activity: three data submissions went to non-whitelisted external destinations, alongside many script console errors. - Domain provenance: registered 2026-08-01 (~0.24 years, about 86 days old), with a single archive snapshot on 2026-08-04 and one year tracked. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured homepage discloses no operating company, no registered address, no terms or privacy documentation and no licensing or registration information. It is too thin to support any assessment of regulatory standing. The real-world operator has not been independently connected to any brand or person, and nothing on the page can be treated as an identity claim. Because the site is a bare page, the lack of disclosure is a verification gap and is not evidence of wrongdoing by itself. In this case, however, it sits alongside confirmed adverse reputation findings and so carries more weight than it would for an otherwise clean site. The domain was registered through the corporate registrar Wix.com Ltd. and has a valid transport-encryption certificate. Both are routine and do not indicate legitimacy, because domain-validated certificates are freely available to any registrant, including malicious operators. Evidence: - Homepage: extremely short text body with no legal, about, contact or licensing content. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YR1 at domain-validation (DV) level only, valid to 2026-12-31. - Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US). - Registration: registrar Wix.com Ltd.; registration runs to 2027-08-01. ### What to Verify Next Any project, token or service that the site purports to represent should be checked through its officially published channels, located independently of this site and not through any link, button or prompt it displays. The site should be treated as unverified until its operator is established through a route that does not depend on the site itself. If the site's purpose is claimed to be financial or crypto-related, the relevant regulator's public registry should be consulted for the named operator. Security-vendor listings should be re-checked later to see whether they have been cleared or are still active. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed through an independent route. Evidence: - Homepage: no named operator that could be matched against any registry. - Reputation: active malicious classifications from multiple security vendors, so a later re-check can show a change. - Domain age: the domain's recent registration means that no long track record exists to lean on. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high risk. Confirmed adverse reputation findings and deceptive page behaviour together outweigh the neutral technical indicators, and these indicators do not make the site trustworthy. The operator remains unverified, and the evidence points towards a site designed to present one thing and deliver another. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site resolves to a single address on a major cloud provider's network, fronted by a trusted CDN/WAF layer, and the true origin server is not observable. This protection is only a mitigating factor, and it cannot offset the reputational findings. The CDN edge address has attracted a large number of abuse reports, but these relate to a shared provider IP serving many unrelated customers, so they are discounted and are not attributed to this site. The young-domain and sparse-footprint flags are unconfirmed heuristics, and they are consistent with the recent registration without adding independent weight. ### Closing Assessment The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection, payments or any financial activity. If it must be visited at all, it should be opened only in read-only mode from an isolated browser or device, and nothing should be downloaded, typed in or approved. Any communication that directed someone to it should be treated as suspect and reported. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, history in the web archive, hosting and network, behaviour in a sandbox. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) - The hosting and network setup shows a moderate level of risk indicators. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_RISK_MED`) ### 04 Behaviour in a sandbox - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 266 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.1 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of shill-sol.com. - The request stayed on shill-sol.com. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under Wix.com Ltd.. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by wixdns.net, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-08-01. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-08-04. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Wix.com Ltd. | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 216.198.79.1 | | Name servers | NS2.WIXDNS.NET, NS3.WIXDNS.NET | | CDN / edge network | Detected | | Resolved IP addresses | 1 | | Edge IP addresses | 1 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | YR1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-31 | | Domain age | 0.24 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-08-01 | | Archive first seen | 2026-08-04 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 13 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 266 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about shill-sol.com at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [itrustcapitaltaxreform.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/itrustcapitaltaxreform.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [kinetiq-en.firebaseapp.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/kinetiq-en.firebaseapp.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [qwblock.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/qwblock.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [pressuresolana.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pressuresolana.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 11/100) - [u-s-d-t-bep-2-0.onrender.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/u-s-d-t-bep-2-0.onrender.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [refundyoursoll.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/refundyoursoll.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [revenuecto.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/revenuecto.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [revenuesolana.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/revenuesolana.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [pahuropw.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pahuropw.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 10/100) - [biddsvault.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/biddsvault.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer) - [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/shill-sol.com) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/shill-sol.com · assessed 2026-10-27.*