--- title: "Is sinport.org a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "sinport.org" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is sinport.org a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/sinport.org assessed: 2026-10-27 --- # Is sinport.org a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** sinport.org shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 16 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 3 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2004 (6 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the sinport.org homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/sinport.org/screenshots/first.png) _What sinport.org served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2004. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. Sinport.org is a website whose homepage title presents it as the "official website" of Skinport, a Counter-Strike 2 (CS2) skin marketplace where visitors can trade and buy in-game skins "securely". Its apparent purpose is a peer-to-peer marketplace for virtual items, where visitors would be asked to authenticate and transact. The domain name is spelled differently from the brand it invokes. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present and decisive. The domain is **blacklisted** by external threat-intelligence sources, and several leading security vendors independently classify it as malicious. The homepage title claims official status for a well-known skin-trading brand, but the domain is a near-variant spelling of that brand's name. This is the standard lookalike pattern used to harvest marketplace logins, trading credentials, and payment details. The site's content could not be deeply analysed, so the specific mechanism of abuse (credential capture, malicious downloads, or fraudulent trades) is not established. The independent detections alone justify a cautionary posture. The domain's history reinforces this. Its archive shows two early captures in 2004 and nothing again until 2026. Its current registration is only a few months old, so the present site is effectively a new deployment. A CS2 skin marketplace is a high-value target because accounts and inventories are easily monetised. Evidence: - Homepage: the page title claims to be the official website of a CS2 skin market, while the domain name is a misspelled variant of that brand. - Reputation: multiple major security vendors flag the domain as malicious, and an external blacklist listing is active. - Domain provenance: registered on 2026-07-20 (~0.27 years old). The archive holds 6 snapshots spanning 2004–2026 (23 years tracked), with three captures in 2004 and three in 2026 and nothing between. ### Regulatory Verification Notes No licensing, registration, or legal-entity disclosure could be confirmed for this site, and the on-page disclosure position remains unclear. For a marketplace handling payments and tradable digital assets, this is a verification gap in its own right. It is not treated as proof of fraud, since the reputational detections above carry that weight. No third-party broker-reputation record matched this domain, and none is relied upon. The site's transport encryption is valid, but it is a basic domain-validated certificate, and encryption confirms only that the connection is private. It says nothing about who operates the site. Evidence: - Homepage: the page was captured successfully, but no operator identity could be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-17 with about 51 days remaining. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (CLOUDFLARENET, Cloudflare, Inc., US); the registrar is Key-Systems GmbH, with registrant details redacted for privacy. ### What to Verify Next Anyone who believes they have an account or pending trade relationship with Skinport should confirm the brand's genuine domain by typing it manually or using a previously saved bookmark. They should not use links from messages, search ads, or chat platforms. Any account activity, trade offers, or payment requests that originated from this domain should be reviewed directly in the genuine platform, and the Steam account should be checked for unexpected sessions or linked applications. If credentials, API keys, or trade links were entered here, they should be treated as exposed and rotated. The operator's claimed licensing or corporate registration should be checked with the relevant registry before any further engagement. Evidence: - Homepage: the "official website" claim should be tested against the brand's own published channels, not against this site. - Registration record: the domain was created in July 2026, so it cannot be a long-standing official property. - Reputation: active vendor detections should be re-checked against current threat feeds before any decision to revisit the site. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high-risk. Independent threat detections and a brand-lookalike domain converge on a site that should be treated as hostile until proven otherwise. Its legitimacy is not established, and nothing in the available evidence offsets the reputational findings. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is a Cloudflare edge address. The origin server is not visible, so independent verification of the real hosting is not possible. Edge-only visibility can also conceal rapid content swaps behind a stable address. This protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only. It is not evidence of legitimacy, and it cannot offset the external threat detections. ### Closing Assessment Treat the site as read-only at most, with no login, credential entry, trade-link sharing, or payment of any kind. Anyone who has already interacted with it should secure their accounts immediately, and any related message or link should be reported to the genuine platform's support channel. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Registration and ownership - The registration record withholds contact details for the operator. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN`) - Registration details are held behind a privacy service, so no operator is named publicly. This is common and legal, and it also means there is nobody to check. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_PRIVATE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 15% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of sinport.org. - The request stayed on sinport.org. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under Key-Systems GmbH. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-07-20. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2004-06-11. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Key-Systems GmbH | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3036::6815:2f7a | | Name servers | olga.ns.cloudflare.com, sonny.ns.cloudflare.com | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-17 | | Domain age | 0.27 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-07-20 | | Archive first seen | 2004-06-11 | | Archive snapshots | 6 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 16 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about sinport.org at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [prestige-client.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/prestige-client.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100) - [polinexclient.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/polinexclient.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [p-edukul.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/p-edukul.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [dcnvda.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dcnvda.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 19/100) - [bangabandhuonline.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bangabandhuonline.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [coffeecatcafe.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/coffeecatcafe.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [qualityexpressllc.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/qualityexpressllc.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [tptkn.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tptkn.org), another .org site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [filezilla.cc](https://trustsniffer.com/report/filezilla.cc), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [voidgame.ink](https://trustsniffer.com/report/voidgame.ink), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sinport.org) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/sinport.org · assessed 2026-10-27.*