--- title: "Is snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 6/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Review, 6/100" trust_score: 6 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-20 --- # Is snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 6/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 6/100.** snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | Programmable is a token-launch platform showing 18 listed launches with market caps, a 'V4 Holder Rewards' eligibility-and-claim campaign that requires a connected wallet, and a risk notice that transactions are irreversible and tokens may lose all value. The page gives no verifiable legal entity, fee terms, or reward criteria. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 11 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE2) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview Programmable is a crypto token-launch platform served from a shared project subdomain. Its homepage presents a searchable directory of 18 listed token launches with market-cap figures, "Launch a token" and "Connect wallet" calls to action, developer tooling (API keys, documentation, custom "hook" modules), and a "V4 Holder Rewards Now Live" campaign inviting visitors to check eligibility and claim bonuses. Its apparent business model is earning from token-launch or module fees, with a rewards campaign as the engagement mechanism. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This is a high-risk assessment driven by confirmed adverse reputation signals. Multiple independent security engines currently flag the site as malicious, and it also appears on an external blacklist. This is a confirmed blacklisting, and it is the decisive factor. Infrastructure protections cannot offset it. The site is also very new, with a single archive capture and no meaningful history. The brand-similarity heuristic tied it to its hosting platform's domain, but no brand impersonation, phishing form, or conflicting legal identity was confirmed. The behavioral sandbox did not observe wallet-drainer activity, clipboard hijacking, hidden forms, or cloaking, and the interaction surface (a wallet-connect prompt) is the only flagged browser behavior. The concern is therefore the combination of blacklist status and a product that asks for wallet access. The "V4 Holder Rewards" campaign tells visitors to connect a wallet to "check eligibility and claim" bonuses, yet the page publishes no eligibility criteria, reward amounts, funding source, or terms. That gap between the claim and the supporting evidence is a classic pattern in wallet-targeting reward lures. The directory itself is dominated by user-created micro-cap tokens such as CLAUS, FELS, HKMN, BLOB, 123321, PI (Programmable Inu), ACAT (APPLE CAT), HOOKTOBER and WFWFW, with market caps from roughly $2.8M down to about $5.9K, several listed within the last day. Tokens of that kind are typical vehicles for rapid launch-and-exit schemes. The page's generic risk notice (irreversible transactions, possible total loss) discloses risk but does not remedy the missing operator information. Informal wording in the rewards banner ("claim they're bonuses") suggests low editorial polish. Evidence: - Homepage: three security engines flag the site as malicious (57 harmless, 33 undetected), and a separate external blacklist lists it. - Domain provenance: registered about 11 days ago (~0.03 years), with 1 archive snapshot, first and last seen 2026-10-09, spanning 1 year tracked. - Homepage: the "V4 Holder Rewards" banner and "Check Eligibility" button give no criteria, amounts, or terms, and require a connected wallet. - Homepage: the token directory lists 18 launches. The visible ones are micro-cap tokens, several created within the previous 1–10 days. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The site names no legal entity, jurisdiction, registration number, or licence, and it provides no terms of service, privacy policy, fee schedule, or contact details. Its link structure exposes no internal or external legal pages. The only visible disclosures are a one-line risk notice and links to social channels. The operator's real-world identity is unverified, and ownership and governance are opaque. Because the platform enables token issuance and trading and operates a rewards programme, the absence of any stated fee model or regulatory status is a material gap rather than an administrative detail. This gap is a verification matter, not proof of fraud. In this case it adds to the blacklist signals above. No third-party broker or regulator record was matched to this site. Evidence: - Homepage and footer: no company name, licence claim, registration number, or terms and privacy pages are present. - Homepage: the fee structure and the source of reward funds are not stated. - Transport layer: the site uses a domain-validated (DV) TLS certificate issued by YE2, valid to 2027-01-04 (75 days remaining). This shows encryption only, not operator identity. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (CLOUDFLARENET, US). ### What to Verify Next Any interaction should wait until the blacklist status is independently resolved and an accountable operator is identified. First, establish who operates the platform through channels that do not rely on links on this page, such as the project's announcements on independently known accounts. Second, treat the "V4" rewards as unconfirmed until the issuer publishes criteria and amounts, and check the token contract addresses on a public blockchain explorer for ownership concentration, mint or admin permissions, and liquidity locks. Third, re-check the site's reputation status after any later remediation, and confirm official support channels offline. Evidence: - Homepage: Discord and X are the only social channels referenced, with no internal or external hyperlinks captured. - Homepage: the token list supplies names, symbols and market caps only, with no contract addresses. - Homepage: the rewards banner and eligibility check are the only mechanism for claiming bonuses. ### Summary Verdict The site is rated at an elevated, critical risk level. Confirmed adverse reputation signals, a very recent and thinly documented history, and a wallet-centred crypto product with unsupported reward claims converge on a clearly cautionary posture. The site's legitimacy is not established, and its operator remains unidentified. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is delivered through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all four observed addresses (two IPv4, two IPv6) are edge servers within its network. The origin server was not observable, so the real hosting location cannot be independently confirmed. That also means content could be swapped quickly without a visible change in hosting. The valid certificate and reputable network are mitigating factors only. They make the delivery path technically sound, and they do not outweigh the adverse reputation findings. ### Closing Assessment Interaction should be limited to passive viewing. Wallets should not be connected, the eligibility or claim function should not be used, and no funds, credentials, or token approvals should be provided to the site until it is delisted from the threat sources and its operator is credibly identified. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content. ### 01 External reputation - Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 03 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 04 Page content - The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`) - The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 55/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 60% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev. - The request stayed on snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-09. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2c40 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | YE2 | | SSL expiry | 2027-01-04 | | Domain age | 0.03 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-10-09 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [mainetsapps.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mainetsapps.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [abster-zr41n3r-sol.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/abster-zr41n3r-sol.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-62.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [poll-okxvote-439.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/poll-okxvote-439.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 13/100) - [gachapads.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/gachapads.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votes-okxpolls-79.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [axiomdeveloperrpc.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/axiomdeveloperrpc.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [ghost-holding.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ghost-holding.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [livesolstream.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/livesolstream.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 1/100) - [fone-meme.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fone-meme.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/snapshots-v4-102.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-20.*